Two-Stage Indicators to Assess Learning Curves for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

Abstract

Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) Ivor Lewis has been increasingly performed over the last two decades. To guide the implementation of this technically demanding procedure, a comprehensive assessment of MIE-Ivor Lewis learning curves should include both the general competence to accomplish the procedure and the ability to generate oncological benefits. These objectives are believed to be associated with different phases of the learning curve.

Methods A retrospective review of the first 109 patients who underwent MIE-Ivor Lewis by a single qualified surgeon was conducted. Relevant variables were collected and assessed by regression analysis to identify suitable indicators for patient stratification and learning curve assessment. Thereafter, the differential analysis was performed among groups to validate the learning curve model.

Results Two variables, intrathoracic gastroesophageal anastomosis time and bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymphadenectomy number, which plateaued, respectively, after the 26th and 88th cases, were selected as meaningful indicators to identify different competence levels. Therefore, 109 patients were chronologically subcategorized into three groups (the first 26 MIEs as the early group, the next 62 cases as the middle group, and 21 most recent cases as the late group). Perioperative data were compared between groups with positive results to indicate a three-phase model for a learning curve for MIE-Ivor Lewis.

Conclusions An MIE-Ivor Lewis learning curve should include three discrete phases that indicate, successively, unskilled operation (general competence to accomplish, less proficiency), surgical proficiency, and oncological efficacy. Intrathoracic anastomosis time and bilateral RLN lymphadenectomy were identified as suitable indicators delineate the different stages of an MIE-Ivor Lewis learning curve.

Keywords

esophageal cancer - minimally invasive surgery - lymph nodes (bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves lymph nodes) - surgery quality management

• References

• 1 Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW. , et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379 9829 1887-1892
• 2 Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O. , et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (01) 95-103
• 3 Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M. , et al. Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc 2003; 17 (03) 515-519
• 4 Guo W, Zou YB, Ma Z. , et al. One surgeon's learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence?. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (04) 1346-1352
• 5 Tapias LF, Morse CR. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: description of a learning curve. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218 (06) 1130-1140
• 6 Biere SSAY, Maas KW, Bonavina L. , et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg 2011; 11: 2
• 7 Pennathur A, Awais O, Luketich JD. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89 (06) S2159-S2162
• 8 Zhang RQ, Xia WL, Kang NN, Ge W, Chen AG, Zhu KC. Pursestring stapled anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94 (06) 2133-2135
• 9 Shen G, Pan SB, Wu M, Zhang S, Xu XF, Chen G. Use of efficient purse-string stapling technique for esophagogastric anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2013; 5 (06) 898-901
• 10 Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Rusch VW. 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17 (07) 1721-1724
• 11 Ajani JA, Barthel JS, Bentrem DJ. , et al; National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2011; 9 (08) 830-887
• 12 2014 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/esophageal.pdf . Accessed June 1, 2014
• 13 Wu J, Chen QX, Zhou XM, Mao WM, Krasna MJ. Does recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis really affect the prognosis in node-positive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus?. BMC Surg 2014; 14: 43
• 14 Tan Z, Ma G, Zhao J. , et al. Impact of thoracic recurrent laryngeal node dissection: 508 patients with tri-incisional esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18 (01) 187-193
• 15 van Workum F, van den Wildenberg FJ, Polat F, de Wilt JH, Rosman C. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis. Dig Surg 2014; 31 (02) 95-103
• 16 Rizk N, Venkatraman E, Park B, Flores R, Bains MS, Rusch V. ; American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 (06) 1374-1381
• 17 Kim DJ, Park SY, Lee S, Kim HI, Hyung WJ. Feasibility of a robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2014; 28 (06) 1866-1873
• 18 Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW. , et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (01) 46-50
• 19 Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H. , et al. Lymph node metastasis and recurrence in patients with a carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-field dissection. World J Surg 1994; 18 (02) 266-272
• 20 Taniyama Y, Nakamura T, Mitamura A. , et al. A strategy for supraclavicular lymph node dissection using recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node status in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95 (06) 1930-1937
• 21 Ye T, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Chen H. Three-field or two-field resection for thoracic esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96 (06) 1933-1941
• 22 Matsubara T, Ueda M, Nagao N, Takahashi T, Nakajima T, Nishi M. Cervicothoracic approach for total mesoesophageal dissection in cancer of the thoracic esophagus. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187 (03) 238-245
• 23 Dhamija A, Rosen JE, Dhamija A. , et al. Learning curve to lymph node resection in minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Innovations (Phila) 2014; 9 (04) 286-291
• 24 Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO. , et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003; 238 (04) 486-494 , discussion 494–495
• 25 Wu W, Zhu Q, Chen L, Liu J. Technical and early outcomes of Ivor Lewis minimally invasive oesophagectomy for gastric tube construction in the thoracic cavity. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014; 18 (01) 86-91
• 26 Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K. , et al. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (12) 2965-2973
• 27 Feng M, Shen Y, Wang H. , et al. Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: is the prone position a safe alternative to the decubitus position?. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 214 (05) 838-844
• 28 Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y. , et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 2012; 36 (07) 1608-1616