PDF herunterladen
Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33(02): 125-132
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598033
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Understanding Approaches to the Dorsal Hump

Dane M. Barrett
1   Duke Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Fernando Casanueva
2   Department of Otolaryngology, San Vicente de Arauco Hospital, Concepcion, Chile
,
Tom Wang
3   Department of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
07. April 2017 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Dorsal hump reduction is a central component of western aesthetic rhinoplasty. Surgical success begins with knowledge of aesthetic ideals and accurate preoperative analysis. Knowledge of the patient's distortion from aesthetic ideals informs approach, technique, and instrument selection. Both endonasal and external approaches are suitable for dorsal hump reduction, though the latter affords more versatility when other surgical modifications are necessary. The main techniques consist of en bloc, Skoog, and component resection. Each has their distinct advantage, though a surgeon's comfort level with each should impact technique selection. Completion of the dorsal reduction often leaves a defect that must be reconstructed. Failure to anticipate the potential long-term sequelae and appropriately manage the dorsal defect can lead to a poor result and patient dissatisfaction.

Keywords

aesthetic rhinoplasty - surgical techniques - dorsal hump - nasal surgery - dorsal hump reduction
 

  • References

  • 1 Azizzadeh B, Reilly M. Dorsal hump reduction and osteotomies. Clin Plast Surg 2016; 43 (1) 47-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Crumley RL, Lanser M. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope 1988; 98 (2) 202-208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Park SS. Fundamental principles in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 4 (2) 55-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Orten S, Hilger P. Facial analysis of the rhinoplasty patient. In: Papel I, , ed. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Thieme; 2002: 361-368
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Lazovic GD, Daniel RK, Janosevic LB, Kosanovic RM, Colic MM, Kosins AM. Rhinoplasty: the nasal bones - anatomy and analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (3) 255-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mowlavi A, Meldrum DG, Wilhelmi BJ. Implications for nasal recontouring: nasion position preferences as determined by a survey of white North Americans. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003; 27 (6) 438-445
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Daniel RK, The radix and the nasofrontal angle. In: Gunter J, Rhorhich R. , eds. 16th Annual Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium. Dallas, TX: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; 1999: 263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Janis JE. Component dorsal hump reduction: the importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (5) 1298-1308 , discussion 1309–1312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sykes JM, Tapias V, Kim JE. Management of the nasal dorsum. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (2) 192-202
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ballert JA, Park SS. Functional considerations in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (3) 348-357
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kasperbauer JL, Kern EB. Nasal valve physiology. Implications in nasal surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987; 20 (4) 699-719
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grymer LF. Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in the cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 1995; 105 (4 Pt 1) 429-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Arslan E, Aksoy A. Upper lateral cartilage-sparing component dorsal hump reduction in primary rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (6) 990-996
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ. External approach for secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80 (2) 161-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Skoog T. A method of hump reduction in rhinoplasty. A technique for preservation of the nasal roof. Arch Otolaryngol 1966; 83 (3) 283-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hall JA, Peters MD, Hilger PA. Modification of the Skoog dorsal reduction for preservation of the middle nasal vault. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6 (2) 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yoo S, Most SP. Nasal airway preservation using the autospreader technique: analysis of outcomes using a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (4) 231-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gruber RP, Melkun ET, Woodward JF, Perkins SW. Dorsal reduction and spreader flaps. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (4) 456-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gruber RP, Park E, Newman J, Berkowitz L, Oneal R. The spreader flap in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (6) 1903-1910
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Tardy Jr ME. Rhinoplasty: The Art and the Science. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Becker DG, Toriumi DM, Gross CW, Tardy Jr ME. Powered instrumentation for dorsal reduction. Facial Plast Surg 1997; 13 (4) 291-297
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The role of piezoelectric instrumentation in rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (1) 21-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, Toro C, Politi M. Ultrasound piezoelectric vibrations to perform osteotomies in rhinoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 (5) 1035-1038
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cochran CS, Roostaeian J. Use of the ultrasonic bone aspirator for lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (6) 1430-1433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Labanca M, Azzola F, Vinci R, Rodella LF. Piezoelectric surgery: twenty years of use. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46 (4) 265-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pribitkin E, Greywoode JD. Sonic rhinoplasty: innovative applications. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (2) 127-132
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pribitkin EA, Lavasani LS, Shindle C, Greywoode JD. Sonic rhinoplasty: sculpting the nasal dorsum with the ultrasonic bone aspirator. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (8) 1504-1507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Clark JM, Cook TA. The ‘butterfly’ graft in functional secondary rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (11) 1917-1925
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Daniel RK. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery: current techniques and applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (6) 1883-1891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar