Postoperative Elevated Resistive Indices Do Not Predict Hepatic Artery Thrombosis in Extended Criteria Donor Livers

Abstract

Postoperative transplant liver ultrasounds were analyzed in standard criteria donor (SCD), extended criteria donor (ECD), and donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver allografts to determine if elevated resistive indices (RIs) are consistently present and if they are pathological. Postoperative transplant liver ultrasounds were reviewed from 115 consecutive patients. Hepatic arterial RIs were stratified based on the type of donor: DCD, macrosteatosis (>30%), or standard criteria. In all patients with elevated RI, subsequent ultrasounds were reviewed to demonstrate RI normalization. The mean RI for all 115 patients was 0.64, DCD was 0.67, macrosteatosis was 0.81, and SCD was 0.61 (p = 0.033). The RI on subsequent liver ultrasounds for DCD and macrosteatosis normalized without any intervention. There were no incidences of early hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) observed in the cohort. Hepatic arterial RI in ECDs and DCDs are elevated in the immediate postoperative period but are not predictive of HAT. It represents interparenchymal graft stiffness and overall graft edema rather than an impending technical complication. The results of our study do not support the routine use of anticoagulation or routine investigation with computed tomography angiography for elevated RIs as these findings are self-limiting and normalize over a short period of time. We hope that this information helps guide the clinical management of liver transplant patients from expanded criteria donors.

Keywords

liver transplantation - liver transplant ultrasound - donation after cardiac death - hepatic macrosteatosis - hepatic artery thrombosis - extended criteria donors

• References

• 1 Busuttil RW, Tanaka K. The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003; 9 (07) 651-663
• 2 Orman ES, Mayorga ME, Wheeler SB. , et al. Declining liver graft quality threatens the future of liver transplantation in the United States. Liver Transpl 2015; 21 (08) 1040-1050
• 3 Nemes B, Gámán G, Polak WG. , et al. Extended-criteria donors in liver transplantation Part II: reviewing the impact of extended-criteria donors on the complications and outcomes of liver transplantation. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 10 (07) 841-859
• 4 Bekker J, Ploem S, de Jong KP. Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence, outcome and risk factors. Am J Transplant 2009; 9 (04) 746-757
• 5 Singh AK, Nachiappan AC, Verma HA. , et al. Postoperative imaging in liver transplantation: what radiologists should know. Radiographics 2010; 30 (02) 339-351
• 6 Frongillo F, Lirosi MC, Nure E. , et al. Diagnosis and management of hepatic artery complications after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2015; 47 (07) 2150-2155
• 7 Platt JF, Yutzy GG, Bude RO, Ellis JH, Rubin JM. Use of Doppler sonography for revealing hepatic artery stenosis in liver transplant recipients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168 (02) 473-476
• 8 Crossin JD, Muradali D, Wilson SR. US of liver transplants: normal and abnormal. Radiographics 2003; 23 (05) 1093-1114
• 9 Sanyal R, Zarzour JG, Ganeshan DM, Bhargava P, Lall CG, Little MD. Postoperative Doppler evaluation of liver transplants. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2014; 24 (04) 360-366
• 10 García-Criado A, Gilabert R, Salmerón JM. , et al. Significance of and contributing factors for a high resistive index on Doppler sonography of the hepatic artery immediately after surgery: prognostic implications for liver transplant recipients. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181 (03) 831-838
• 11 Teramoto K, Bowers JL, Kruskal JB, Clouse ME. Hepatic microcirculatory changes after reperfusion in fatty and normal liver transplantation in the rat. Transplantation 1993; 56 (05) 1076-1082
• 12 Kolachala VL, Jiang R, Abramowsky CR, Gupta NA. Contrast-based real-time assessment of microcirculatory changes in a fatty liver after ischemia reperfusion injury. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016; 62 (03) 429-436
• 13 Frulio N, Trillaud H. Ultrasound elastography in liver. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013; 94 (05) 515-534
• 14 Lutz HH, Schroeter B, Kroy DC, Neumann U, Trautwein C, Tischendorf JJ. Doppler ultrasound and transient elastography in liver transplant patients for noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in comparison with histology: a prospective observational study. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60 (09) 2825-2831
• 15 Mikkonen RH, Kreula JM, Virkkunen PJ. Reproducibility of Doppler ultrasound measurements. Acta Radiol 1996; 37 (04) 545-550
• 16 Mancini M, Daniele S, Raffio T. , et al. Intra and interobserver variability of renal allograft ultrasound volume and resistive index measurements. Radiol Med (Torino) 2005; 109 (04) 385-394
• 17 Humphrey T, Bainbridge C, Stringer M. Reproducibility of measurements of hepatic artery and portal vein diameter and flow velocity in paediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatr Radiol 2007; 37 (08) 813-817