Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Iberoamericana de Cirugía de la Mano 2017; 45(01): 003-011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602805
Original Article | Artículo Original
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Metacarpal Enlargement of the Amputated Thumb using Callotaxis: An Observational Study

Article in several languages: English | español
Noemí Lambán-Mascaray
1   Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgery, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain
,
Eduardo Blanco-Baiges
2   Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
,
Pedro Marquina-Sola
3   Hand Surgery, Hospital MAZ, Zaragoza, Spain
,
Jesús Barco-Marcellán
4   Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgery, Hospital MAZ, Zaragoza, Spain
,
Samuel Pajares-Cabanillas
5   Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgery, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
,
Jesús Gómez-Vallejo
2   Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

14 March 2017

04 April 2017

Publication Date:
14 June 2017 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To confirm the effectiveness of bone elongation through callus distraction of the first metacarpal as a functional alternative in active patients with a thumb amputation.

Methods The study population consisted of patients who suffered a nonreplantable amputation of the thumb and failed to meet the criteria for a microsurgical transfer at our hospitals between 1995 and 2014. We performed an observational cohort study for the incidence analysis and a cross-sectional design for the analysis of the correlations among the variables.

Results We presented 23 callus distractions of the first metacarpal, with an elongation time between surgeries of approximately 104.7 days (standard deviation [SD]: 3.2), with a miniRail external mini-fixator, and an average elongation of 25.5 mm (SD: 0.54). All patients achieved a functional grip, but five of them had to find new jobs. The degree of satisfaction was high, except in two patients, and was significantly related to the time of the elongation.

Conclusions Callus distraction allows for a reconstruction of the thumb with few complications. We recommend associating it with a commissuroplasty and an adductor transposition. Patients give more importance to the comfort of the procedure than to the elongated length, provided that adequate function is achieved.

Keywords

bone lengthening - callotaxis - gradual distraction - thumb amputation
 

  • References

  • 1 Real Decreto. 1856/2009, de 4 de diciembre, de procedimiento para el reconocimiento, declaración y calificación del grado de discapacidad, y por el que se modifica el Real Decreto 1971/1999, de 23 de diciembre. Boletín Oficial del Estado de 26 de diciembre de 2009. 311: 110413–110415. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2009/12/26/pdfs/BOE-A-2009-20891.pdf (último acceso 10 de febrero de 2017).
    PubMed
  • 2 Baumeister S, Menke H, Wittemann M, Germann G. Functional outcome after the Moberg advancement flap in the thumb. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (01) 105-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chase RA. An alternate to pollicization in subtotal thumb reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 44 (05) 421-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lister G. The choice of procedure following thumb amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (195) 45-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Adani R, Corain M, Tarallo L, Fiacchi F. Alternative method for thumb reconstruction. Combination of 2 techniques: metacarpal lengthening and mini wraparound transfer. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (05) 1006-1011
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Del Piñal F, Pennazzato D, Urrutia E. Primary thumb reconstruction in a mutilated hand. Hand Clin 2016; 32 (04) 519-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Del Piñal F, García-Bernal FJ, Thams C, Studer A, Regalado J. Informe sobre el transplante de 250 dedos del pie a la mano consecutivos. Indicaciones, resultados, fracasos y nuevas aplicaciones. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2011; 55 (04) 257-262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Matev IB. Thumb reconstruction through metacarpal bone lengthening. J Hand Surg Am 1980; 5 (05) 482-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Merle M. Reconstrucción del pulgar. En: Merle M, Dautel G, Loda G. Mano traumática. Cirugía secundaria. Muñeca traumática. Barcelona: Masson; 1996: 249-261
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Dana C, Auregan JC, Salon A, Guero S, Glorion C, Pannier S. Metacarpal lengthening in children: comparison of three different techniques in 15 consecutive cases. J Hand Surg Eur 2016; 42 (01) 51-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Toh S, Narita S, Arai K, Nakashima K, Tsubo K. Distraction lengthening by callotasis in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (02) 205-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Foucher G, Lamas C, Mir X. Reconstrucción digital según técnica de Matev. Estudio de 45 casos. Rev Iberoam Cir Mano 2000; 27 (57) 31-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Matev I. Thumb metacarpal lengthening. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2003; 7 (04) 157-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Seitz Jr WH, Froimson AI. Digital lengthening using the callotasis technique. Orthopedics 1995; 18 (02) 129-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Capdevila Leonori R, Nualard Hernández L. Alargamiento progresivo de los huesos de las manos mediante callotasis. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 1999; 43: 23-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Heitmann C, Levin LS. Distraction lengthening of thumb metacarpal. J Hand Surg [Br] 2004; 29 (01) 71-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Matev IB. Progressive lengthening. En: G. Foucher. Reconstructive surgery in hand mutilation. London: Martin Dunitz; 1997: 23-28
    Google Scholar