Importance of Frontal Horn Ratio and Optimal CSF Drainage in the Treatment of Very Low-Pressure Hydrocephalus
31 January 2017
13 October 2017
11 December 2017 (eFirst)
Introduction Unlike low-pressure hydrocephalus, very low pressure hydrocephalus (VLPH) is a rarely reported clinical entity previously described to be associated with poor outcomes and to be possibly refractory to treatment with continued cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage at subatmospheric pressures.1, 2 We present four cases of VLPH following resection of suprasellar lesions and hypothesize that untreatable patients can be identified early, thereby avoiding futile prolonged external ventricular drainage in ICU.
Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of four cases of VLPH encountered between 2007 and 2015 in two different institutions and practices and tried to identify factors contributing to successful treatment. We hypothesized that normalization of frontal horn ratio (FHR), optimization of volume of CSF drained, and avoidance of fluid shifts would contribute to improved Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). We examined fluid shifts by studying net fluids shifts and serum levels of sodium, urea, and creatinine. We used Pearson and Spearman correlations to identify measures that would correlate with improved GCS.
Results Our study reveals that improving GCS is positively correlated with decreased FHR and increased CSF drainage within an optimal range. The most important determinant of good outcome is retention of brain viscoelasticity as evidenced by restoration and maintenance of good GCS score despite fluctuations in FHR.
Conclusion Futile prolonged subatmospheric drainage can be avoided by declining to continue treatment in patients who have permanently altered brain compliance secondary to unsealed CSF leaks, irremediable ventriculitis, and who are therefore unable to sustain an improved neurologic examination.
- 1 Pang D, Altschuler E. Low-pressure hydrocephalic state and viscoelastic alterations in the brain. Neurosurgery 1994; 35 (04) 643-655 , discussion 655–656
- 2 Hamilton MG, Price AV. Syndrome of inappropriately low-pressure acute hydrocephalus (SILPAH). Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2012; 113: 155-159
- 3 Rekate HL, Nadkarni TD, Wallace D. The importance of the cortical subarachnoid space in understanding hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008; 2 (01) 1-11
- 4 Akins PT, Guppy KH, Axelrod YV, Chakrabarti I, Silverthorn J, Williams AR. The genesis of low pressure hydrocephalus. Neurocrit Care 2011; 15 (03) 461-468
- 5 Clarke MJ, Maher CO, Nothdurft G, Meyer F. Very low pressure hydrocephalus. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 2006; 105 (03) 475-478
- 6 Filippidis AS, Kalani MY, Nakaji P, Rekate HL. Negative-pressure and low-pressure hydrocephalus: the role of cerebrospinal fluid leaks resulting from surgical approaches to the cranial base. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (05) 1031-1037
- 7 Vassilyadi M, Farmer JP, Montes JL. Negative-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1995; 83 (03) 486-490
- 8 Hahn FJY, Rim K. Frontal ventricular dimensions on normal computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976; 126 (03) 593-596