RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00035024.xml
PDF herunterladen
Thromb Haemost 2003; 89(02): 407-408
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613459
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613459
Letters to the Editor
A reply to rebuttal: What is the risk of withholding anticoagulation in those with a low probability ventilation perfusion scan in the investigation of pulmonary emboli?
Weitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
Reiceved
11. November 2002
Accepted
11. November 2002
Publikationsdatum:
07. Dezember 2017 (online)
-
References
- 1 Perrier A, Bounameaux H. A Rebuttal: What is the risk of withholding anticoagulation in those with a low probability Ventilation Perfusion Scan: An unacceptable Risk. Thromb Haemost 2002; 88: 702
- 2 Iles S, Egermayer P, Hlavac M, Turner J, Town GI. What is the risk of withholding anticoagulation in those with a low probability Ventilation Perfusion Scan in the investigation of Pulmonary Emboli?. Thromb Haemost 2002; 87: 772
- 3 Egermayer P, Town GITurner. et al Usefulness of D-dimer, blood gas and respiratory rate measurements for excluding pulmonary embolism. Thorax 1998; 53: 830-4.