Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34(01): 059-065
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1615283
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Surgical Approach to the Thick Nasolabial Folds, Jowls and Heavy Neck—How to Approach and Suspend the Facial Ligaments

Ozcan Cakmak
1   FACEISTANBUL, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Ismet Emrah Emre
2   Otorhinolaryngology Unit, ACIBADEM Atakent University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Berke Özücer
3   Başkent University, Istanbul Hospital, Altunizade, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

Abstract

Patients with thick skin typically present with a redundant, baggy, lax skin envelope together with prominent nasolabial folds, jowls, and a heavy neck. Durable and natural-appearing rejuvenation is not possible unless the deformities are addressed adequately and harmoniously in these patients. Traditional superficial musculoaponeurotic system techniques do not include surgical release of the zygomatic cutaneous ligaments and repositioning of descendent malar fat pad, and may lead to an unbalanced, unnatural appearance and the lateral sweep phenomenon. Additional attempts to improve unopposed nasolabial folds such as fat grafting to malar region are more likely to result with a “stuffed” look, far from a natural and rejuvenated appearance, and must therefore be avoided. The facelift techniques including true release of the anchoring ligaments of the midface and allowing adequate repositioning of saggy tissues are ideal for these patients to obtain harmonious, natural result. Despite the extensive dissections, maximal release, and maximal lateral pull, additional maneuvers, e.g., platysmaplasty, subplatysmal fat removal, or partial resection of submandibular glands may be required for satisfying result in patients with heavy neck. In this article, the authors outline the relevant anatomy of the facial retaining ligaments and their implications to surgical management of patients with heavy skin are discussed.

 
  • References

  • 1 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (03) 441-449 , discussion 450–451
  • 2 Owsley Jr JQ, Zweifler M. Midface lift of the malar fat pad: technical advances. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (02) 674-685 , discussion 686–687
  • 3 Marten TJ. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 569-603 , vi–vii
  • 4 Choucair RJ, Hamra ST. Extended superficial musculaponeurotic system dissection and composite rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 607-622 , vii
  • 5 Alghoul M, Codner MA. Retaining ligaments of the face: review of anatomy and clinical applications. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (06) 769-782
  • 6 Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (01) 11-16
  • 7 Ozdemir R, Kilinç H, Unlü RE, Uysal AC, Sensöz O, Baran CN. Anatomicohistologic study of the retaining ligaments of the face and use in face lift: retaining ligament correction and SMAS plication. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (04) 1134-1147 , discussion 1148–1149
  • 8 Gamboa GM, de La Torre JI, Vasconez LO. Surgical anatomy of the midface as applied to facial rejuvenation. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52 (03) 240-245
  • 9 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The retaining system of the face: histologic evaluation of the septal boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 1804-1809
  • 10 Alghoul M, Bitik O, McBride J, Zins JE. Relationship of the zygomatic facial nerve to the retaining ligaments of the face: the Sub-SMAS danger zone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (02) 245e-252e
  • 11 Mendelson BC, Muzaffar AR, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 885-896 , discussion 897–911
  • 12 Huettner F, Rueda S, Ozturk CN. , et al. The relationship of the marginal mandibular nerve to the mandibular osseocutaneous ligament and lesser ligaments of the lower face. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (02) 111-120
  • 13 Muzaffar AR, Mendelson BC, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral canthus. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 873-884 , discussion 897–911
  • 14 Mustoe TA, Rawlani V, Zimmerman H. Modified deep plane rhytidectomy with a lateral approach to the neck: an alternative to submental incision and dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 357-370
  • 15 Jacono AA, Malone MH. Characterization of the cervical retaining ligaments during subplatysmal facelift dissection and its implications. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (05) 495-501
  • 16 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (01) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
  • 17 Hamra ST. A study of the long-term effect of malar fat repositioning in face lift surgery: short-term success but long-term failure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 940-951 , discussion 952–959
  • 18 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (01) 1-13
  • 19 Hamra ST. Frequent face lift sequelae: hollow eyes and the lateral sweep: cause and repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (05) 1658-1666
  • 20 Barton Jr FE, Hunt J. The high-superficial musculoaponeurotic system technique in facial rejuvenation: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (07) 1910-1917
  • 21 Ramirez OM. Three-dimensional endoscopic midface enhancement: a personal quest for the ideal cheek rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (01) 329-340 , discussion 341–349
  • 22 Quatela VC, Azzi JP, Antunes MB. Endoscopic-assisted facelifting. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (04) 413-421
  • 23 Hamra ST. Building the composite face lift: a personal odyssey. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 85-96
  • 24 Warren RJ, Aston SJ, Mendelson BC. Face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 747e-764e
  • 25 Aston SJ. Commentary on: high superficial musculoaponeurotic system facelift with finger-assisted facial spaces dissection for Asian patients. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (01) 9-10
  • 26 Hwang K, Lee DK, Lee EJ, Chung IH, Lee SI. Innervation of the lower eyelid in relation to blepharoplasty and midface lift: clinical observation and cadaveric study. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47 (01) 1-5 , discussion 5–7
  • 27 Tremolada C, Fissette J, Candiani P. Anatomical basis for a safe and easier approach to composite rhytidectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1994; 18 (04) 387-391
  • 28 Jacono AA, Talei B. Vertical neck lifting. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (02) 285-316
  • 29 Dedo DD. “How I do it”—plastic surgery. Practical suggestions on facial plastic surgery. A preoperative classification of the neck for cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Laryngoscope 1980; 90 (11 Pt 1): 1894-1896
  • 30 Baker DC. Lateral SMASectomy, plication and short scar facelifts: indications and techniques. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 533-550 , vi
  • 31 Perkins SW, Waters HH. The extended SMAS approach to neck rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (02) 253-268
  • 32 Feldman JJ. Neck lift my way: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (06) 1173-1183
  • 33 Feldman JJ. Corset platysmaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85 (03) 333-343
  • 34 Stuzin JM. Discussion. Modified deep plane rhytidectomy with a lateral approach to the neck: an alternative to submental incision and dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 371-373
  • 35 Perkins SW, Gibson FB. Use of submentoplasty to enhance cervical recontouring in face-lift surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119 (02) 179-183
  • 36 Mendelson BC, Tutino R. Submandibular gland reduction in aesthetic surgery of the neck: review of 112 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (03) 463-471