Summary
In several countries of central Europe, patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis
(DVT) are treated not only by anticoagulation and compression therapy but additionally
by strict bed rest for 6-8 days. Until now the theoretical assumption that bed rest
substantially reduces the incidence of pulmonary embolism has not been subjected to
empirical verification. Patients with acute proximal DVT proven by ultrasonography
were randomly assigned to strict bed rest for 8 days (treatment group) or to stay
mobilised (control group). In both groups, basic treatment consisted in anticoagulation
by subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin/vitamin-K-antagonist and compression
therapy. The incidence of pulmonary embolism was assessed by serial ventilation/perfusion
SPECT on day 1 and days 8-10. Of the 309 patients with proximal DVT considered for
inclusion, 180 were excluded according to the study protocol, and 3 did not give informed
consent. One hundred and twenty-six patients were randomly assigned to observe bed
rest (n = 62) or to keep mobilised (n = 64). Four patients refused follow-up lung
scan.A new lung perfusion defect was detected in 10/59 patients in the treatment group
compared to 14/63 patients in the control group (one-sided p-value = 0.25; power 0.8).
Bed rest as an additional measure in the treatment of DVT is not able to substantially
reduce the incidence of scintigraphically detectable pulmonary embolism. The discomfort
and costs associated with the prescription of bed rest in DVT are obviously inappropriate.
Key words
Deep vein thrombosis - pulmonary embolism - lung scintigraphy - bed rest