J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79(03): 239-246
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1617759
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Intraoperative Seizures in Awake Craniotomy for Perirolandic Glioma Resections That Undergo Cortical Mapping

Chikezie Ikechukwu Eseonu
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Jordina Rincon-Torroella
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Young M. Lee
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Karim ReFaey
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
,
Punita Tripathi
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

28 January 2017

08 September 2017

Publication Date:
18 January 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Perirolandic motor area gliomas present invasive eloquent region tumors within the precentral gyrus that are difficult to resect without causing neurologic deficits.

Study Aims This study evaluates the role of awake craniotomy and motor mapping on neurologic outcome and extent of resection (EOR) of tumor in the perirolandic motor region. It also analyzes preoperative risk factors for intraoperative seizures.

Methods We evaluated 57 patients who underwent an awake craniotomy for a perirolandic motor area eloquent region glioma. Patients who had positive mapping (PM) or intraoperative identification of motor regions in the cortex using direct cortical stimulation were compared with patients with no positive motor mapping following direct cortical stimulation and negative mapping (NM). Preoperative risks, intraoperative seizures, perioperative outcomes, tumor characteristics, and EOR were also compared. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the predictors for intraoperative seizures in this patient cohort.

Results Overall, 33 patients were in the PM cohort; 24 were in the NM cohort. Our study showed an 8.8% incidence of intraoperative seizures during cortical and subcortical mapping for awake craniotomies in the perirolandic motor area, none of which aborted the case. PM patients had significantly more intraoperative and postoperative seizures (15.5% and 30.3%, respectively) compared with the NM patients (0% and 8.3%, respectively; p = 0.046 and 0.044). New transient postoperative motor deficits were found more often in the PM group (51.5%) versus the NM group (12.5%; p = 0.002). A univariate logistic regression showed that PM (odds ratio [OR]: 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.34; p = 0.035) and preoperative tumor volume (OR: 0.998; 95% CI, 0.996–0.999; p = 0.049) were significant predictors for intraoperative seizures in patients with perirolandic gliomas.

Conclusion Awake craniotomies in the perirolandic motor region can be safely performed with a similar incidence of intraoperative seizures as reported for the language cortex. PM in this region may increase the likelihood of perioperative seizures or motor deficits compared with NM. Craniotomies that minimize cortical exposure for perirolandic gliomas that may not localize motor regions can still allow for extensive tumor resection with a good postoperative outcome.

 
  • References

  • 1 Boetto J, Bertram L, Moulinié G, Herbet G, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H. Low rate of intraoperative seizures during awake craniotomy in a prospective cohort with 374 supratentorial brain lesions: electrocorticography is not mandatory. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (06) 1838-1844
  • 2 Duffau H. Lessons from brain mapping in surgery for low-grade glioma: insights into associations between tumour and brain plasticity. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4 (08) 476-486
  • 3 Lubrano V, Draper L, Roux FE. What makes surgical tumor resection feasible in Broca's area? Insights into intraoperative brain mapping. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (05) 868-875 ; discussion 875
  • 4 Skirboll SS, Ojemann GA, Berger MS, Lettich E, Winn HR. Functional cortex and subcortical white matter located within gliomas. Neurosurgery 1996; 38 (04) 678-684 ; discussion 684–685
  • 5 Ojemann JG, Miller JW, Silbergeld DL. Preserved function in brain invaded by tumor. Neurosurgery 1996; 39 (02) 253-258 ; discussion 258–259
  • 6 Bookheimer S. Pre-surgical language mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychol Rev 2007; 17 (02) 145-155
  • 7 Máté A, Lidzba K, Hauser TK, Staudt M, Wilke M. A “one size fits all” approach to language fMRI: increasing specificity and applicability by adding a self-paced component. Exp Brain Res 2016; 234 (03) 673-684
  • 8 Reithmeier T, Krammer M, Gumprecht H, Gerstner W, Lumenta CB. Neuronavigation combined with electrophysiological monitoring for surgery of lesions in eloquent brain areas in 42 cases: a retrospective comparison of the neurological outcome and the quality of resection with a control group with similar lesions. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003; 46 (02) 65-71
  • 9 Kim SS, McCutcheon IE, Suki D. , et al. Awake craniotomy for brain tumors near eloquent cortex: correlation of intraoperative cortical mapping with neurological outcomes in 309 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (05) 836-845 ; discussion 345–346
  • 10 Gonen T, Grossman R, Sitt R. , et al. Tumor location and IDH1 mutation may predict intraoperative seizures during awake craniotomy. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (05) 1133-1138
  • 11 Nossek E, Matot I, Shahar T. , et al. Failed awake craniotomy: a retrospective analysis in 424 patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. J Neurosurg 2013; 118 (02) 243-249
  • 12 Nossek E, Matot I, Shahar T. , et al. Intraoperative seizures during awake craniotomy: incidence and consequences: analysis of 477 patients. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (01) 135-140 ; discussion 140
  • 13 Serletis D, Bernstein M. Prospective study of awake craniotomy used routinely and nonselectively for supratentorial tumors. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (01) 1-6
  • 14 Hervey-Jumper SL, Li J, Lau D. , et al. Awake craniotomy to maximize glioma resection: methods and technical nuances over a 27-year period. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (02) 325-339
  • 15 Berger MS. Functional mapping-guided resection of low-grade gliomas. Clin Neurosurg 1995; 42: 437-452
  • 16 Berger MS, Rostomily RC. Low grade gliomas: functional mapping resection strategies, extent of resection, and outcome. J Neurooncol 1997; 34 (01) 85-101
  • 17 Black PM, Ronner SF. Cortical mapping for defining the limits of tumor resection. Neurosurgery 1987; 20 (06) 914-919
  • 18 Ciric I, Ammirati M, Vick N, Mikhael M. Supratentorial gliomas: surgical considerations and immediate postoperative results. Gross total resection versus partial resection. Neurosurgery 1987; 21 (01) 21-26
  • 19 Haglund MM, Berger MS, Shamseldin M, Lettich E, Ojemann GA. Cortical localization of temporal lobe language sites in patients with gliomas. Neurosurgery 1994; 34 (04) 567-576 , discussion 576
  • 20 Berger MS, Kincaid J, Ojemann GA, Lettich E. Brain mapping techniques to maximize resection, safety, and seizure control in children with brain tumors. Neurosurgery 1989; 25 (05) 786-792
  • 21 Matz PG, Cobbs C, Berger MS. Intraoperative cortical mapping as a guide to the surgical resection of gliomas. J Neurooncol 1999; 42 (03) 233-245
  • 22 Ojemann G, Ojemann J, Lettich E, Berger M. Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients. 1989. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (02) 411-421
  • 23 Ojemann GA. Individual variability in cortical localization of language. J Neurosurg 1979; 50 (02) 164-169
  • 24 Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Ojemann SG, Sanai N, Dillon WP, Berger MS. Preoperative correlation of intraoperative cortical mapping with magnetic resonance imaging landmarks to predict localization of the Broca area. J Neurosurg 2003; 99 (02) 311-318
  • 25 Walker JA, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Berger MS. Intraoperative speech mapping in 17 bilingual patients undergoing resection of a mass lesion. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (01) 113-117 ; discussion 118
  • 26 Chaichana KL, Jusue-Torres I, Navarro-Ramirez R. , et al. Establishing percent resection and residual volume thresholds affecting survival and recurrence for patients with newly diagnosed intracranial glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2014; 16 (01) 113-122
  • 27 Chaichana KL, Jusue-Torres I, Lemos AM. , et al. The butterfly effect on glioblastoma: is volumetric extent of resection more effective than biopsy for these tumors?. J Neurooncol 2014; 120 (03) 625-634
  • 28 Chaichana KL, Cabrera-Aldana EE, Jusue-Torres I. , et al. When gross total resection of a glioblastoma is possible, how much resection should be achieved?. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (1-2): e257-e265
  • 29 Sartorius CJ, Wright G. Intraoperative brain mapping in a community setting—technical considerations. Surg Neurol 1997; 47 (04) 380-388
  • 30 Sacko O, Lauwers-Cances V, Brauge D, Sesay M, Brenner A, Roux FE. Awake craniotomy vs surgery under general anesthesia for resection of supratentorial lesions. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (05) 1192-1198 ; discussion 1198–1199
  • 31 Szelényi A, Bello L, Duffau H. , et al; Workgroup for Intraoperative Management in Low-Grade Glioma Surgery within the European Low-Grade Glioma Network. Intraoperative electrical stimulation in awake craniotomy: methodological aspects of current practice. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28 (02) E7
  • 32 Eseonu CI, Eguia F, Garcia O, Kaplan PW, Quiñones-Hinojosa A. Comparative analysis of monotherapy versus duotherapy antiseizure drug management for postoperative seizure control in patients undergoing an awake craniotomy. J Neurosurg 2017; 1-7
  • 33 Skardelly M, Brendle E, Noell S. , et al. Predictors of preoperative and early postoperative seizures in patients with intra-axial primary and metastatic brain tumors: a retrospective observational single center study. Ann Neurol 2015; 78 (06) 917-928
  • 34 Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger MS. Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (01) 18-27
  • 35 Duffau H, Capelle L, Sichez J. , et al. Intra-operative direct electrical stimulations of the central nervous system: the Salpêtrière experience with 60 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141 (11) 1157-1167
  • 36 Danks RA, Aglio LS, Gugino LD, Black PM. Craniotomy under local anesthesia and monitored conscious sedation for the resection of tumors involving eloquent cortex. J Neurooncol 2000; 49 (02) 131-139
  • 37 Taylor MD, Bernstein M. Awake craniotomy with brain mapping as the routine surgical approach to treating patients with supratentorial intraaxial tumors: a prospective trial of 200 cases. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (01) 35-41
  • 38 Lee YJ, Chung TS, Yoon YS. , et al. The role of functional MR imaging in patients with ischemia in the visual cortex. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22 (06) 1043-1049
  • 39 Picht T, Kombos T, Gramm HJ, Brock M, Suess O. Multimodal protocol for awake craniotomy in language cortex tumour surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148 (02) 127-137 ; discussion 137–138
  • 40 Schreiber A, Hubbe U, Ziyeh S, Hennig J. The influence of gliomas and nonglial space-occupying lesions on blood-oxygen-level-dependent contrast enhancement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21 (06) 1055-1063
  • 41 King RB, Schell GR. Cortical localization and monitoring during cerebral operations. J Neurosurg 1987; 67 (02) 210-219
  • 42 Zakhary R, Keles GE, Berger MS. Intraoperative imaging techniques in the treatment of brain tumors. Curr Opin Oncol 1999; 11 (03) 152-156
  • 43 Basu I, Anderson W. Bipolar vs monopolar stimulation for cortical mapping: which is better?. Neurosurgery 2014; 75 (04) N16-N17
  • 44 Kovac S, Scott CA, Maglajlija V. , et al. Comparison of bipolar versus monopolar extraoperative electrical cortical stimulation mapping in patients with focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125 (04) 667-674
  • 45 Martino J, Gomez E, Bilbao JL, Dueñas JC, Vázquez-Barquero A. Cost-utility of maximal safe resection of WHO grade II gliomas within eloquent areas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (01) 41-50
  • 46 Berger MS, Deliganis AV, Dobbins J, Keles GE. The effect of extent of resection on recurrence in patients with low grade cerebral hemisphere gliomas. Cancer 1994; 74 (06) 1784-1791
  • 47 Keles GE, Anderson B, Berger MS. The effect of extent of resection on time to tumor progression and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme of the cerebral hemisphere. Surg Neurol 1999; 52 (04) 371-379
  • 48 Keles GE, Lamborn KR, Berger MS. Low-grade hemispheric gliomas in adults: a critical review of extent of resection as a factor influencing outcome. J Neurosurg 2001; 95 (05) 735-745
  • 49 Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR. , et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 2001; 95 (02) 190-198
  • 50 Berger MS, Ojemann GA, Lettich E. Neurophysiological monitoring during astrocytoma surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1990; 1 (01) 65-80
  • 51 Berger MS. Surgery of low-grade gliomas—technical aspects. Clin Neurosurg 1997; 44: 161-180
  • 52 Yingling CD, Ojemann S, Dodson B, Harrington MJ, Berger MS. Identification of motor pathways during tumor surgery facilitated by multichannel electromyographic recording. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (06) 922-927
  • 53 Eseonu CI, ReFaey K, Garcia O, John A, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Tripathi P. Awake craniotomy anesthesia: a comparison of the monitored anesthesia care and asleep-awake-asleep techniques. World Neurosurg 2017; 104: 679-686