Hamostaseologie 2000; 20(01): 65-69
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1619470
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

Behandlung der tiefen Venenthrombose

Treatment of Venous Thrombosis
H. Riess
1   Medizinische Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Charité, Berlin
,
A. Loew
1   Medizinische Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Charité, Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 December 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Von den verschiedenen, zur Behandlung der tiefen Venenthrombose zur Verfügung stehenden Optionen, stellt die akute Antikoagulanzientherapie mit Heparinen, insbesondere niedermolekularen Heparinen, gefolgt von der frühzeitig überlappend eingeleiteten oralen Antikoagulation, das Standardvorgehen dar. Thrombolyse, Thrombektomie und Implantation von Kavaschirmfiltern kommen nur bei wenigen Patienten sinnvoll in Betracht. Während somit die medikamentöse Therapie mit Heparinen und Cumarinen die medikamentöse Standardbehandlung darstellt, sind begleitende Therapiemaßnahmen, wie die Notwendigkeit zur initialen Immobilisation der Patienten sowie zur Kompressionsbehandlung bei tiefen Venenthrombosen in ihrer Wertigkeit ungesichert und Gegenstand kontroverser Diskussionen. Darüber hinaus werden die optimale Dauer der oralen Antikoagulation, der Stellenwert einer prolongierten Therapie mit niedermolekularen Heparinen sowie der Stellenwert neuerer Antithrombotika wie Antithrombine, Faktor-Xa-Hemmstoffe und »Tissue factor pathway inhibitor« diskutiert.

Summary

The management of acute venous thrombosis is based on the initial anticoagulation with heparins – more recently low molecular weight heparins – followed by early started overlapping prolonged oral anticoagulation. Only in a few situations medical thrombolysis, thrombectomy, implantation of vena cava filters may be considered as alternative treatment strategies. Whereas anticoagulation with heparins and cumarins is the current standard the role of initial bed rest of the patients, as well as the role of external compression are discussed controversially. Furthermore the optimal duration of oral anticoagulation as well as the role of prolonged anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparins have to be defined by further investigations. In addition new anticoagulant drugs such as thrombin- or factor Xa- or tissue-factor-pathway-inhibitors may become effective in the treatment of venous thrombosis in the future.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Basu D, Gallus A, Hirsh J. et al. A prospective study of the value of monitoring heparin treatment with activated partial thromboplastin time. N Eng J Med 1972; 287: 324-7.
  • 2 Brandjes DP, Büller HR, Heijober H. et al. A randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1997; 349 (9054): 759-62.
  • 3 Brandjes DP, Heijober H, Büller HR. et al. Acenocoumarol and heparin compared with acenocoumarol alone in the initial treatment of proximal vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1485.
  • 4 Cruickshank MK, Levine MN, Hirsh J. A standard heparin nomogram for the management of heparin therapy. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 333.
  • 5 Czestowska E, Zawilska K, Cencora A. et al. Low molecular weight heparin versus acenocoumarol in the secondary prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1999; 81: 26-31.
  • 6 Das SK, Cohen AT, Edmondson RA. et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus warfarin for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a randomized trial. World J Surg 1996; 20: 521-7.
  • 7 Decousus MN, Leizorovicz A, Parent F. et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 409-15.
  • 8 Elliot MN, Immelmann EJ, Benatar JSR. et al. A comparative randomized trial of heparin versus streptokinase in the treatment of acute proximal vein thrombosis: an interim report of a prospective trial. Br J Surg 1997; 66: 838-43.
  • 9 Gallus A, Jackamann J, Tillet J. et al. A Safety and efficacy of warfarin started early after submassive venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Lancet 1986; ii: 1293-6.
  • 10 Goldhaber SZ, Buring JE, Lipnick RJ. et al. Pooled analysis of randomized trials of streptokinase and heparin in phlebographically documented acute deep vein thrombosis. Am J Med 1984; 76: 393-8.
  • 11 Hirsh J, Lensing A. Thrombolytic therapy for deep vein thrombosis. Int Angiol 1996; 5: S22-5.
  • 12 Hull RD, Delmore T, Carter C. et al. Adjusted subcutaneous heparin versus warfarin sodium in the long-term treatment of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 189-94.
  • 13 Hull R D, Hirsh J, Jay R. et al. Different intensities of oral anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 1676-881.
  • 14 Hull RD, Raskob GE, Brant RF. et al. Relation between the time to achieve the lower limit of the APTT therapeutic range and recurrent venous thromboembolism during heparin treatment for deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2562-8.
  • 15 Hull RD, Raskob GE, Rosenbloom D. et al. Heparin for 5 days compared with 10 days in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1990; 332: 1260-4.
  • 16 Kearon C, Gent M, Hirsh J. et al. A comparison of three months coagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 901-7.
  • 17 Koopman MMW, Kraaijenhagen RA, Büller HR. The feasibility of low molecular weight heparin treatment of venous thromboembolism at home. Vessels 1997; 3: 12.
  • 18 Koopman MMW, Prandoni P, Piovella F. et al. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 682.
  • 19 Leisorovicz A. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparins in the initial treatment of deep enous thrombosis. An uptated metaanalysis. Drugs 1996; 52 (Suppl. 07) 30.
  • 20 Lensing AW, Prins MH, Davidson BL. et al. Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparins. A meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 601.
  • 21 Levine MN, Gent M, Hirsh J. et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin admininstered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 677.
  • 22 Levine MN, Hirsh J, Gent M. et al. Optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy; a randomized trial comparing four weeks with three months of warfarin in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74: 606-11.
  • 23 Moia M, Schiele F, Walker M. et al. Treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by subcutaneous r-Hirudin (HBW 023): a multi-centrestudy. Thromb Haemost 1995; 73: 1456.
  • 24 Monreal M, Lafoz E, Olive A. et al. Comparison of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin (Fragmin) in patients with venous thromboembolism and contraindications to coumarin. Thromb Haemost 1994; 71: 191.
  • 25 Pacourent C, Alison D, Pottier J M. et al. Freefloating thrombus and embolic risk in patients with angiographically confirmed proximal deep venous thrombosis. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 305-8.
  • 26 Partsch H, Kechavarz B, Mostbeck A. et al. Frequenzy of pulmonary embolism in patients who have iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and are treated with once- or twice-daily low-molecular-weight heparin. J Vasc Surg 1996; 24: 774-82.
  • 27 Pini M, Aiello S, Manotti C. et al. Low molecular weight heparin versus warfarin in the prevention of recurrences after deep venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1994; 72: 191.
  • 28 Plate G, Akesson H, Einarsson E. et al. Longterm results of venous thrombectomy combined with temporary arteriovenous fistula. Eur J Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 4: 483-9.
  • 29 Raschke RA, Reilly BM, Guidry JR. et al. The weight-based heparin dosis nomogram compared with a »standard care nomogram«. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 874-81.
  • 30 Semba CP, Dake MD. Ilifemoral deep venous thrombosis: Aggressive therapy with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Radiology 1994; 191: 487.
  • 31 Sharafuddin MJ, Hicks ME. Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy: Part III Present and future applications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9: 209-24.
  • 32 Shulman S, Granqvist S, Holmstrom M. et al. The duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a second episode of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 393-8.
  • 33 Siragusa S, Cosmi B, Pivella F. et al. Low-molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism: Results of a metaanalysis. Am J Med 1996; 100: 269.
  • 34 The Columbus Investigators. Low-molecular weight heparin in the treatment of patients with thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 657.
  • 35 Warkentin TE, Levine NM, Hirsh J. et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1330.