Phlebologie 2008; 37(04): 189-190
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1622229
Schattauer GmbH

Strategy and changes in the treatment of varicose veins

Steven E. Zimmet
1   Austin, Texas, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 January 2018 (online)


  • References

  • 1 Coleridge-Smith P, Labropoulos N, Partsch H, Myer K, Nicolaides A, Cavezzi A. Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs-UIP consensus document. Part 1: Basic principles. Phlebology 2006; 21: 158-167.
  • 2 Mendoza E. To the topographic anatomy of the Vena saphena magna: A duplex sonographische study regarding by surgery relevant aspects. Phlebologie 2001; 30: 140-144.
  • 3 Mendes RR, Marston WA, Farber MA, Keagy BA. Treatment of superficial and perforator venous incompetence without deep venous insufficiency: is routine perforator ligation necessary?. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 891-895.
  • 4 Stuart WP, Adam DJ, Allan PL, Ruckley CV, Bradbury AW. Saphenous surgery does not correct perforator incompetence in the presence of deep venous reflux. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 834-838.
  • 5 Merchant RF, DePalma RG, Kabnick LS. Endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux: a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 1190-1196.
  • 6 Min RJ, Khilnani N, Zimmet SE. Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 991-996.
  • 7 Rabe E, Otto J, Schliephake D, Pannier F. Efficacy and safety of great saphenous vein sclerotherapy using standardised polidocanol foam (ESAF): a randomised controlled multicentre clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 35: 238-245.
  • 8 McDaniel M, Nehler R, Santilli SM. Extended outcome assessment in the care of vascular diseases: Revising the paradigm for the 21st century. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32: 1239-1250.
  • 9 Bountouroglou DG, Azzam M, Kakkos SK, Pathmarajah M, Young P, Geroulakos G. Ultrasoundguided foam sclerotherapy combined with saphenofemoral ligation compared to surgical treatment of varicose veins: early results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 31: 93-100.
  • 10 Mekako AI, Hatfield J, Bryce J. et al. A nonrandomized controlled trial of endovenous laser therapy and surgery in the treatment of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg 2006; 20: 451-457.
  • 11 Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS, Kistner RL, Pichot O, Sessa C, Schuller-Petrovic S. Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29: 67-73.
  • 12 Marston WA, Owens LV, Davies S, Mendes RR, Farber MA, Keagy BA. Endovenous saphenous ablation corrects the hemodynamic abnormality in patients with CEAP clinical class 3–6 CVI due to superficial reflux. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 40: 125-130.
  • 13 De Medeiros, Luccas GC. Comparison of endovenous treatment with an 810 nm laser versus conventional stripping of the great saphenous vein in patients with primary varicose veins. Derm Surg 2005; 31: 1685-1694.
  • 14 Rautio T, Ohinmaa A, Perala J. et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 958-965.
  • 15 Hinchliffe RJ, Ubhi J, Beech A. et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of VNUS closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 31: 212-218.
  • 16 Vuylsteke M, Van den Bussche D, Audenaert EA, Lissens P. Endovenous obliteration for the treatment of primary varicose veins. Phlebology 2006; 21: 80-87.
  • 17 Rasmussen LH, Bjoern L, Lawaetz M. et al. Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short term results. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 308-315.