Vital Opportunity

Julia Twohig

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1629888

Homœopathic Links, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Homœopathic Links 2018; 31(01): 014-017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1629888

Philosophy and Discussion

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Vital Opportunity

Julia Twohig

¹Ethelton, South Australia

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

The concept of a vital or life force is integral to homeopathic practice and one of the many departure points from mainstream medicine. Dual-processing theory is presented by researchers as an explanation for why some people can and others cannot think vitalistically.

Keywords

vitalism - life force - duel-processing theory

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Winston J. The Faces of Homoeopathy. Wellington, New Zealand: Great Auk Publishing; 1999
2 Wilson S. Vitalistic thinking in adults. Br J Psychol 2013; 104 (04) 512-524
3 Schreeve C. The subtle truth about energy. J Altern Complement Med 1998; 4 (01) 17-29
4 Hufford D. Challenges for healing and intentionality research: social dynamics involved in entering the mainstream. In: Jonas W, Crawford C. . eds., Healing Intention and Energy Medicine: Science, Research Methods and Clinical Implications. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2003: 293-306
5 Todaro-Franceschi V. Clarifying the enigma of energy, philosophically speaking. Nurs Sci Q 2008; 21 (04) 285-290
6 Clarke P. Aboriginal healing practices and Australian bush medicine. Journal of the Anthropological Society of South Australia 2008; 33: 3-39
7 Kenyon J. Bio-energetic regulatory medicine. IJCAM 1994; 14: 21-25
8 Mittelstadt U. The implausibility of the vital force in the existent medical paradigm. NHMRC 2015, NHMRC Information Paper: Evidence on the Effectiveness of homeopathy for treating health conditions, Australian Government, Canberra, 2014. Available at: https://cleverhomeopathy.wordpress.com/2014/05/01/the-implausability-of-the-vital-force-in-the-existent-medical-paradigm
9 Hahnemann S. Organon of the Medical Art. 6th ed. Redmond, WA: Birdcage Books; 1842
10 Bellavite P, Signorini A. The Emerging Science of Homeopathy. Complexity, Biodynamics, and Nanopharmacology. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books; 2002
11 Inagaki K, Hatano G. Young children's understanding of the mind-body distinction. Child Dev 1993; 64 (05) 1534-1549
12 Lindeman M, Saher M. Vitalism, purpose and superstition. Br J Psychol 2007; 98 (Pt 1): 33-44
13 Inagaki K, Hatano G. Children's understanding of mind-body relationships. In: Siegal M, Peterson CC. , eds., Children's Understanding of Biology and Health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999: 24-44
14 Stanovich KE, West RF. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?. Behav Brain Sci 2000; 23 (05) 645-665 , discussion 665–726
15 Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane; 2011
16 Frisch D. The Tao of thinking. Behav Brain Sci 2000; 23 (05) 672-673
17 Sun R, Slusarz P, Terry C. The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: a dual-process approach. Psychol Rev 2005; 112 (01) 159-192
18 Haehl R. Samuel Hahnemann: His Life & Work. Vol. 1, 1989 ed. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers; 1922
19 Benneth J. World's Fastest Growing Medicine. The John Benneth Journal, 2011. Available at: https://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/worlds-fastest-growing-medicine/
20 Canguilhem G. The Normal and the Pathological [trans. Carolyn Fawcett]. New York: Zone Books; 1991