Thromb Haemost 2018; 118(04): 639-646
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632388
Coagulation and Fibrinolysis
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Effect of Additional Treatments Combined with Conventional Therapies in Pregnant Patients with High-Risk Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Multicentre Study

Authors

  • Amelia Ruffatti

    1   Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • Marta Tonello

    1   Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • Ariela Hoxha

    1   Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • Savino Sciascia

    2   Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Maria J. Cuadrado

    2   Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • José O. Latino

    3   Autoimmune,Thrombophilic Diseases and Pregnancy Division, Dr. Carlos G Durand Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Sebastian Udry

    3   Autoimmune,Thrombophilic Diseases and Pregnancy Division, Dr. Carlos G Durand Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Tatiana Reshetnyak

    4   Department of Systemic Rheumatic Disease, V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia
  • Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau

    5   AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Internal Medicine Department, Centre de Référence Maladies Auto-immunes et Systémiques Rares, Paris, France
    6   Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
    7   INSERM U 1153, Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics, Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), Paris, France
  • Nathalie Morel

    5   AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Internal Medicine Department, Centre de Référence Maladies Auto-immunes et Systémiques Rares, Paris, France
    6   Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
  • Luca Marozio

    8   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Università di Torino, Torino, Italy
  • Angela Tincani

    9   Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
  • Laura Andreoli

    9   Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
  • Ewa Haladyj

    10   Department of Connective Tissue Diseases, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
  • Pier L. Meroni

    11   Division of Rheumatology, G. Pini Institute, Milan
    12   Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
    13   Istituto Auxologico IRCCS, Milan, Italy
  • Maria Gerosa

    11   Division of Rheumatology, G. Pini Institute, Milan
    12   Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
    13   Istituto Auxologico IRCCS, Milan, Italy
  • Jaume Alijotas-Reig

    14   Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
    15   Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma, Barcelona, Spain
  • Sara Tenti

    16   Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
  • Karoline Mayer-Pickel

    17   Department of Obstetrics, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Michal J. Simchen

    18   Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  • Maria T. Bertero

    19   Clinical Immunology, AO Ordine Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
  • Sara De Carolis

    20   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
  • Véronique Ramoni

    21   Division of Rheumatology, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy
  • Arsène Mekinian

    22   Service de Médecine Interne et l'inflammation-(DHU i2B), Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Université Paris 06, Paris, France
  • Elvira Grandone

    23   Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis Unit, I.R.C.C.S. Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, S. Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
  • Aldo Maina

    24   Servizio di Medicina Interna, Ospedale Sant'Anna, Torino, Italy
  • Fátima Serrano

    25   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Vittorio Pengo

    1   Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
    26   Cardiology Clinic, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • Munther A. Khamashta

    2   Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    27   Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, Division of Women's Health, St Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    28   Department of Rheumatology, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

23 August 2017

05 January 2018

Publication Date:
28 February 2018 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The effect of additional treatments combined with conventional therapy on pregnancy outcomes was examined in high-risk primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) patients to identify the most effective treatment strategy. The study's inclusion criteria were (1) positivity to lupus anticoagulant alone or associated with anticardiolipin and/or anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies; (2) a history of severe maternal–foetal complications (Group I) or a history of one or more pregnancies refractory to conventional therapy leading to unexplained foetal deaths not associated with severe maternal–foetal complications (Group II). Two different additional treatments were considered: oral—low-dose steroids (10–20 mg prednisone daily) and/or 200 to 400 mg daily doses of hydroxychloroquine and parenteral—intravenous immunoglobulins at 2 g/kg per month and/or plasma exchange. The study's primary outcomes were live birth rates and pregnancy complications. A total of 194 pregnant PAPS patients attending 20 tertiary centres were retrospectively enrolled. Hydroxychloroquine was found to be linked to a significantly higher live birth rate with respect to the other oral treatments in the Group II patients. The high (400 mg) versus low (200 mg) doses of hydroxychloroquine (p = 0.036) and its administration before versus during pregnancy (p = 0.021) were associated with a significantly higher live birth rate. Hydroxychloroquine therapy appeared particularly efficacious in the PAPS patients without previous thrombosis. Parenteral treatments were associated with a significantly higher live birth rate with respect to the oral ones (p = 0.037), particularly in the Group I patients. In conclusion, some additional treatments were found to be safe and efficacious in high-risk PAPS pregnant women.