Modeling Cancer Registration Processes with an Enhanced Activity Diagram

Summary

Objectives: Adequate instruments are needed to reflect the complexity of routine cancer registry operations properly in a business model. The activity diagram is a key instrument of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) for the modeling of business processes. The authors aim to improve descriptions of processes in cancer registration, as well as in other public health domains, through the enhancements of an activity diagram notation within the standard semantics of UML.

Methods: The authors introduced the practical approach to enhance a conventional UML activity diagram, complementing it with the following business process concepts: timeline, duration for individual activities, responsibilities for individual activities within swimlanes, and descriptive text.

Results: The authors used an enhanced activity diagram for modeling surveillance processes in the cancer registration domain. Specific example illustrates the use of an enhanced activity diagram to visualize a process of linking cancer registry records with external mortality files.

Conclusions: Enhanced activity diagram allows for the addition of more business concepts to a single diagram and can improve descriptions of processes in cancer registration, as well as in other domains. Additional features of an enhanced activity diagram allow to advance the visualization of cancer registration processes. That, in turn, promotes the clarification of issues related to the process timeline, responsibilities for particular operations, and collaborations among process participants. Our first experiences in a cancer registry best practices development workshop setting support the usefulness of such an approach.

Keywords

Public health informatics - organizational models - unified modeling language (UML) - population surveillance - cancer

^* Research described in this paper was conducted while Dr. Wilk was a postdoctoral fellow in the School of Management, University of Ottawa.

• References

• 1 Hutchinson C, Roffers S, Fritz A. editors Cancer Registry Management: Principles and Practice. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; 1997: 1-549.
• 2 National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/.
• 3 North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR). Web site. http://www.naaccr.org.
• 4 Weber R, Knaup P, Knietig R, Haux R, Merzweiler A, Mludek V, Schilling F, Wiedemann T. Object-oriented Business Process Analysis of the Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Trial of the German Society for Paediatric Oncology and Haematology (GPOH). Patel V, Rogers R, Haux R (eds). Medinfo 2001. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics. Amsterdam: IOS; 10 (Pt 1): 58-62.
• 5 Lyalin DS, Williams WG, Scharber WK. Applying Business Modeling Techniques to Central Cancer Registry Operations. Journal of Registry Management 2003; 30 (02) 36-45.
• 6 Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley; 1998
• 7 Eriksson HE, Penker M. Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2000
• 8 Heumann J. Introduction to Business Modeling Using the Unified Modeling Language (UML), The Rational Edge, March 2001. Available at. http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/360.html.
• 9 Ericsson M. Activity Diagrams: What They Are and How to Use Them, Rose Architect, Fall 1999, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 12-18. Available at. http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/content/RationalEdge/rosearchitect/ra_fall1999.pdf.
• 10 Lieberman B. UML Activity Diagrams: Versatile Roadmaps for Understanding System Behavior. The Rational Edge, April 2001. Available at. http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/content/RationalEdge/apr01/UMLActivityDiagramsApr01.pdf.
• 11 Johnston S. Rational UML Profile for business modeling. Available at. http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/5167.html#N10036.
• 12 Ammenwerth E, Ehlers F, Eischstadter R, Haux R, Pohl U, Resch F. Systems Analysis in Health care: Framework and Example. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 134-40.