CC BY 4.0 · TH Open 2018; 02(01): e89-e95
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636537
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Sensitivity of a Simple Noninvasive Screening Algorithm for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension after Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Yvonne M. Ende-Verhaar
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
Dieuwertje Ruigrok
2   Department of Pulmonology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Harm Jan Bogaard
2   Department of Pulmonology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Menno V. Huisman
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
,
Lilian J. Meijboom
3   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Anton Vonk Noordegraaf
2   Department of Pulmonology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Frederikus A. Klok
1   Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Funding This was an academically sponsored study.
Further Information

Publication History

20 July 2017

25 January 2018

Publication Date:
27 February 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Recently, we constructed a noninvasive screening algorithm aiming at earlier chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) detection after acute pulmonary embolism (PE), consisting of a prediction score and combined electrocardiography (ECG)/N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) assessment. The aim of this study was to confirm the algorithm's sensitivity for CTEPH detection and to evaluate the reproducibility of its individual items.

Methods Two independent researchers calculated the prediction score in 54 consecutive patients with a history of acute PE and proven CTEPH based on clinical characteristics at PE diagnosis, and evaluated the ECG and NT-proBNP level assessed at the moment of CTEPH diagnosis. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of the prediction score, right-to-left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio measurement on computed tomography pulmonary angiography, as well as ECG reading was evaluated by calculating Cohen's kappa statistics.

Results Median time between PE diagnosis and presentation with CTEPH was 9 months (interquartile range: 5–15). The sensitivity of the algorithm was found to be 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79–97%), indicating that 27 of 30 cases of CTEPH would have been detected when applying the screening algorithm to 1,000 random PE survivors with a 3% CTEPH incidence (projected negative predictive value: 99.7%; 95% CI: 99.1–99.9%). The interobserver agreement for calculating the prediction score, RV/LV ratio measurement, and ECG reading was excellent with a kappa of 0.96, 0.95, and 0.89, respectively.

Conclusion The algorithm had a high sensitivity of 91% and was highly reproducible. Prospective validation of the algorithm in consecutive PE patients is required before it can be used in clinical practice.

Authors' Contributions

Yvonne M. Ende-Verhaar was responsible for the design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, as well as drafting of the manuscript.


Dieuwertje Ruigrok was responsible for the design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.


Harm Jan Bogaard was responsible for the design of the study and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.


Menno V. Huisman was responsible for the design of the study and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.


Lilian J. Meijboom was responsible for the design of the study and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.


Anton Vonk Noordegraaf was responsible for the design of the study and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.


Frederikus A. Klok was responsible for the design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, as well as drafting of the manuscript.


 
  • References

  • 1 Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL. , et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J 2015; 46 (04) 903-975
  • 2 Mayer E, Jenkins D, Lindner J. , et al. Surgical management and outcome of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results from an international prospective registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141 (03) 702-710
  • 3 Delcroix M, Lang I, Pepke-Zaba J. , et al. Long-term outcome of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results from an international prospective registry. Circulation 2016; 133 (09) 859-871
  • 4 Tscholl D, Langer F, Wendler O, Wilkens H, Georg T, Schäfers HJ. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy--risk factors for early survival and hemodynamic improvement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19 (06) 771-776
  • 5 Kunihara T, Gerdts J, Groesdonk H. , et al. Predictors of postoperative outcome after pulmonary endarterectomy from a 14-year experience with 279 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40 (01) 154-161
  • 6 Pepke-Zaba J, Delcroix M, Lang I. , et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): results from an international prospective registry. Circulation 2011; 124 (18) 1973-1981
  • 7 Klok FA, Dzikowska-Diduch O, Kostrubiec M. , et al. Derivation of a clinical prediction score for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14 (01) 121-128
  • 8 Klok FA, Surie S, Kempf T. , et al. A simple non-invasive diagnostic algorithm for ruling out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients after acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2011; 128 (01) 21-26
  • 9 Klok FA, Tesche C, Rappold L. , et al. External validation of a simple non-invasive algorithm to rule out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2015; 135 (05) 796-801
  • 10 Ende-Verhaar YM, Cannegieter SC, Vonk Noordegraaf A. , et al. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: a contemporary view of the published literature. Eur Respir J 2017; 49 (02) 1601792
  • 11 Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968; 70 (04) 213-220
  • 12 Ende-Verhaar YM, Huisman MV, Klok FA. To screen or not to screen for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2017; 151: 1-7
  • 13 Guérin L, Couturaud F, Parent F. , et al. Prevalence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. Prevalence of CTEPH after pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112 (03) 598-605
  • 14 Lang IM, Madani M. Update on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 2014; 130 (06) 508-518
  • 15 Hoeper MM, Madani MM, Nakanishi N, Meyer B, Cebotari S, Rubin LJ. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2 (07) 573-582
  • 16 Vonk Noordegraaf A, Westerhof BE, Westerhof N. The relationship between the right ventricle and its load in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69 (02) 236-243
  • 17 Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Haddad F, Chin KM. , et al. Right heart adaptation to pulmonary arterial hypertension: physiology and pathobiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62 (25, Suppl): D22-D33