Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Joints 2018; 06(01): 023-032
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636931
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Factors Affecting Subjective and Objective Outcomes and Return to Play in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Federica Rosso
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AO Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
,
Davide E. Bonasia
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AO Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
,
Umberto Cottino
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AO Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
,
Simone Cambursano
2   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
,
Federico Dettoni
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AO Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
,
Roberto Rossi
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AO Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 March 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To analyze the prognostic factors influencing subjective and objective outcomes and return to play (RTP) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R).

Methods Primary ACL-Rs using a transtibial technique performed between 2008 and 2012 were included. Data regarding patients, surgery, sports, and rehabilitation, including an on-field rehabilitation (OFR) and duration of the rehabilitation program, were collected. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective evaluation forms, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Lysholm questionnaires were used for the assessment of subjective and objective outcomes. The Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sports and ACL–return to sport after injury (RSI) scores were used for RTP evaluation. Several potential predictors of outcome were tested with a univariate analysis. All the variables with p < 0.1 were retested in a logistic regression model to evaluate their association with the outcomes.

Results In total, 176 cases were included with an average follow-up of 44.1 months. Of the patients, 92.2% were rated as normal or nearly normal at the IKDC evaluation. In addition, 90.1% of the patients returned to sport, with 57.6% returning to the same preinjury level. Objective outcomes were negatively influenced by late rehabilitation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.75). Performing an OFR phase during the rehabilitation was associated with better subjective outcomes (OR = 2.71). Length of rehabilitation strongly influenced the RTP rate (OR = 13.16). Conversely, higher ACL-RSI score was inversely related to RTP. Objective IKDC score was inversely related to the ACL-RSI (OR = 0.31), whereas subjective score was correlated with both the total ACL-RSI score (OR = 0.15) and the level of activity (OR = 0.20).

Conclusion This study confirmed the role of rehabilitation on subjective and objective outcomes and on RTP. Particularly, the complete adherence to a rehabilitation program, including an OFR phase, resulted in better subjective outcomes and higher RTP rate. The relationship between psychological factors, measured through the ACL-RSI score, and RTP was confirmed.

Level of Evidence Level III, observational study without a control group.

Keywords

knee - anterior cruciate ligament - reconstruction - instability - athlete
 

  • References

  • 1 Mall NA, Chalmers PN, Moric M. , et al. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (10) 2363-2370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Samitier G, Marcano AI, Alentorn-Geli E, Cugat R, Farmer KW, Moser MW. Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2015; 3 (04) 220-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (01) 41-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 McCullough KA, Phelps KD, Spindler KP. , et al; MOON Group. Return to high school- and college-level football after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort study. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (11) 2523-2529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48 (21) 1543-1552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nwachukwu BU, Voleti PB, Berkanish P. , et al. Return to play and patient satisfaction after ACL reconstruction: study with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (09) 720-725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lai CCH, Ardern CL, Feller JA, Webster KE. Eighty-three per cent of elite athletes return to preinjury sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review with meta-analysis of return to sport rates, graft rupture rates and performance outcomes. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52 (02) 128-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mohtadi NG, Chan DS. Return to sport-specific performance after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2017; DOI: 10.1177/0363546517732541.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 McGrath TM, Waddington G, Scarvell JM. , et al. An ecological study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 2: functional performance tests correlate with return-to-sport outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5 (02) 2325967116688443
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE. Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (07) 1549-1558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Flanigan DC, Everhart JS, Pedroza A, Smith T, Kaeding CC. Fear of reinjury (kinesiophobia) and persistent knee symptoms are common factors for lack of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (08) 1322-1329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lentz TA, Zeppieri Jr G, George SZ. , et al. Comparison of physical impairment, functional, and psychosocial measures based on fear of reinjury/lack of confidence and return-to-sport status after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (02) 345-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Paterno MV, Flynn K, Thomas S, Schmitt LC. Self-reported fear predicts functional performance and second ACL injury after ACL reconstruction and return to sport: a pilot study. Sports Health 2017; DOI: 10.1177/1941738117745806.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport 2008; 9 (01) 9-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Müller U, Krüger-Franke M, Schmidt M, Rosemeyer B. Predictive parameters for return to pre-injury level of sport 6 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (12) 3623-3631
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Della Villa S, Boldrini L, Ricci M. , et al. clinical outcomes and return-to-sports participation of 50 soccer players after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction through a sport-specific rehabilitation protocol. Sports Health 2012; 4 (01) 17-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Everhart JS, Best TM, Flanigan DC. Psychological predictors of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 752-762
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Krych AJ, Woodcock JA, Morgan JA, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Dahm DL. Factors associated with excellent 6-month functional and isokinetic test results following ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (04) 1053-1059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jones MH, Spindler KP. Risk factors for radiographic joint space narrowing and patient reported outcomes of post-traumatic osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction: data from the MOON cohort. J Orthop Res 2017; 35 (07) 1366-1374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cox CL, Huston LJ, Dunn WR. , et al. Are articular cartilage lesions and meniscus tears predictive of IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity level outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A 6-year multicenter cohort study. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (05) 1058-1067
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Abrams GDHJ, Harris JD, Gupta AK. , et al. Functional performance testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med 2014; 2 (01) 2325967113518305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Xergia SA, Pappas E, Georgoulis AD. Association of the single-limb hop test with isokinetic, kinematic, and kinetic asymmetries in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health 2015; 7 (03) 217-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Logerstedt D, Grindem H, Lynch A. , et al. Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (10) 2348-2356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gokeler A, Welling W, Zaffagnini S, Seil R, Padua D. Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (01) 192-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL. , et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (05) 600-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Padua R, Bondi R, Ceccarelli E. , et al. Italian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (08) 819-823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (05) 890-897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (Suppl. 11) S208-S228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D. , et al; International Knee Documentation Committee. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine 2007; 74 (06) 594-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Monticone M, Ferrante S, Salvaderi S. , et al. Development of the Italian version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for patients with knee injuries: cross-cultural adaptation, dimensionality, reliability, and validity. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20 (04) 330-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28 (02) 88-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rockborn P, Gillquist J. Outcome of arthroscopic meniscectomy. A 13-year physical and radiographic follow-up of 43 patients under 23 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 (02) 113-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Cole BJ, Cotter EJ, Wang KC, Davey A. Patient understanding, expectations, outcomes, and satisfaction regarding anterior cruciate ligament injuries and surgical management. Arthroscopy 2017; 33 (05) 1092-1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hambly K, Griva K. IKDC or KOOS: which one captures symptoms and disabilities most important to patients who have undergone initial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (07) 1395-1404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Johnson DS, Smith RB. Outcome measurement in the ACL deficient knee--what's the score?. Knee 2001; 8 (01) 51-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Blonna D, Castoldi F, Delicio D. , et al. Validity and reliability of the SPORTS score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (02) 356-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Prodromos CC, Han Y, Rogowski J, Joyce B, Shi K. A meta-analysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury-reduction regimen. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (12) 1320-1325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kautzner J, Kos P, Hanus M, Trc T, Havlas V. A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (01) 125-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Saka T. Principles of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. World J Orthop 2014; 5 (04) 450-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 van Grinsven S, van Cingel RE, Holla CJ, van Loon CJ. Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (08) 1128-1144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 de Valk EJ, Moen MH, Winters M, Bakker EW, Tamminga R, van der Hoeven H. Preoperative patient and injury factors of successful rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with single-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (11) 1879-1895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Han F, Banerjee A, Shen L, Krishna L. Increased compliance with supervised rehabilitation improves functional outcome and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in recreational athletes. Orthop J Sports Med 2015; 3 (12) 2325967115620770
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45 (07) 596-606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Ardern CL, Österberg A, Tagesson S, Gauffin H, Webster KE, Kvist J. The impact of psychological readiness to return to sport and recreational activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48 (22) 1613-1619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Langford JL, Webster KE, Feller JA. A prospective longitudinal study to assess psychological changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43 (05) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kowalchuk DA, Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ. Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (05) 457-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Tanaka M, Vyas D, Moloney G, Bedi A, Pearle AD, Musahl V. What does it take to have a high-grade pivot shift?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (04) 737-742
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lidén M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Kartus J. Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study with a 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (05) 740-748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Pua YH, Ho JY, Chan SA, Khoo SJ, Chong HC. Associations of isokinetic and isotonic knee strength with knee function and activity level after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective cohort study. Knee 2017; 24 (05) 1067-1074
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar