A Time of Change for Medical Informatics in the USA

• References

• 1 Lyon BJ, Stavri PZ, Hochstein DC, Nardini HG. Internet access in the libraries of the National Network of Libraries of Medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1998; Oct;86 486-90.
• 2 National Telecommunications and Information Association. Fallingthrough the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide. Washington DC: July 28 1998
• 3 Wood FB, Cid VH, Siegel ER. Evaluating Internet end-to-end perfonnance: overview of test methodology and results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 528-45.
• 4 Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL. The High Performance Computing and Communications Program, the National Information Infrastructure and Health Care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1995; 2: 156-9.
• 5 Schatz B, Hardin J. NCSA Mosaic and the World-Wide Web: Global Hypermedia Protocols for the Internet. Science. 1994; Aug 12 265: 895-901.
• 6 Information about this study is available on the National Academy of Sciences Website www.nas.edu
• 7 Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor -let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997; 277: 1244-5.
• 8 Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?. JAMA 1998; 279: 611-4.
• 9 Voge S. NOAH-New York online access to health: library collaboration for bilingual consumer health information on the Internet. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1998; 86: 326-34 http://www.noah.cuny.edul
• 10 Redman PM, Kelly JR, Albright ED, Anderson PF, Mulder C, Schnell EH. Common ground: the Health Web project as a model for Internet collaboration. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1997; 85: 325-30 http:// healthweb.orgl
• 11 Lindberg DAB. The computer and medical care. In: Laboratory Data Systems without Computers, Chapter VII. Springfield: (Ill): Charles C. Thomas 1968
• 12 Lindberg DAB. Collection, evaluation, and transmission of hospital laboratory data. Meth Inf Med 1967; 6: 97-107.
• 13 Barnett GO, Baruch JJ. Hospital computer project. Memorandum VIII. Status report 1965. Boston, Massachusetts General Hospital 1965
• 14 McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Dexter PR. et al Canopy computing: using the Web in clinical practice. JAMA 1998; 280: 1325-9.
• 15 Lowe HJ, Antipov I, Walker WK, Polonkey SE, Naus GJ. Web Report: a World Wide Web based clinical multimedia reporting system. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996; 314-8.
• 16 Perednia AA. Telemedicinetechnologyand clinical applications. JAMA 1995; 273: 483-8.
• 17 Kane B, Sands DZ. Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinician-Patient Electronic Mail. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 104-11.
• 18 Fridsma DB, Ford P, Altman R. A survey of patient access to electronic mail: attitudes, barriers, and opportunities. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994; 15-9.
• 19 Spielberg AR. On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA 1998; 280: 1333-5.
• 20 Hoffman A. Take 2, and e-mail me in the morning: doctors consult patients electronically. New York Times-Cyber Times. June 3 1997 Available at http://search.nytimes.corn/search/dailylbin/fastweb (Accessed December 4, 1998.)
• 21 Hogue CW. Cn3D: a new generation of three-dimensional molecular structure viewer. Trends Biochem Sci 1997; 22: 314-6.
• 22 Rodgers RPC. JAVA and its future in biomedical computing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 303-7.