Yearb Med Inform 1999; 08(01): 113-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637916
Commentary
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

A Convenient Framework for Health and Medical Decision Making Processes

Reflections on S.G. Pauker's paper: Therapeutic Decision Making
J. Gouvernet
1   Laboratoire d’Enseignement et de Recherche sur le Traitement de Information Médicale, faculté de Médecine de Marseille, Marseille, France
,
M. Fieschi
1   Laboratoire d’Enseignement et de Recherche sur le Traitement de Information Médicale, faculté de Médecine de Marseille, Marseille, France
,
R. Giorgi
1   Laboratoire d’Enseignement et de Recherche sur le Traitement de Information Médicale, faculté de Médecine de Marseille, Marseille, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 March 2018 (online)

 
  • References

  • 1 Raiffa H. Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley; 1968
  • 2 Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. Therapeutic decision making: A cost-benefit analysis. N Eng!J Med 1975; 293: 229-34.
  • 3 Moskowitz AJ, Kuipers BJ, Kassirer JP. Dealingwithuncertainty, risksandtradeoffs in clinical decisions: a cognitive science approach. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 435-49..
  • 4 Detsky AS, Naglie G, Krahn MD, Naimark D, Redelmeier DA. Primer on medj decision analysis. Part 1 to 5. Med D Making 1997; 17: 123-59.
  • 5 Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1980
  • 6 Baron J. Why expected utility theory normative, but not prescriptive. Med Dec Making 1996; 16: 7-9.
  • 7 Holtzman S. lntelligent Decision System Reading MA: Addison-Wesley Pub, 19;
  • 8 Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment unde uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science. 1974; 185: 1124-31.