Download PDF
Yearb Med Inform 1999; 08(01): 218-220
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637923
Commentary
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

What has Changed after Dr. Lawrence Weed’s paper in 1968?

Reflections on L.L. Weed's paper: Medical Records that Guide and Teach
H. Takeda
1   Department of Medical Information Science, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 March 2018 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints
 

  • References

  • 1 Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. New Engl J Med 1968; 278: 593-600 652-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hurst JW. Ten reasons why Lawrence Weed is right. New Engl J Med 1971; 284: 51-2.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Weed LL. Medical Records, Medical Education, and Patient Care. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University Press; 1969
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Fischer PJ, Stratmann WC, Lundsgaarde HP, Steele DJ. User reaction to PRO MIS: Issues related to acceptability of medical innovations. In Proceedings SCAMC.. Washington DC: IEEE Comp Soc Press; 1980
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Matsumura Y, Takeda H, Okada T. et al. Devices for structured data entry in elsstronic patient records. In: Cesnik B. et al eds. Proceedings MEDINFO98.: Amsterded IOS Press; 1998: 85-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Van Ginneken AM. Structured data enter in ORCA: the strengths of two modal combined. In: Cimino JJ. ed. Proceeding AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. Washington DC: IEEE Comp Soc Press; 1996: 79-801..
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nordayke RA, Kukikowski CA. An informatics-based chronic disease practice; CA study of a 35-year computer-based long tudinal record system. J Am Med Infores Assoc 1998; 5: 88-103.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar