Electronic Health Record Goes Personal World-wide
07 March 2018 (online)
Objective Increasing patient demand for convenient access to their own healthcare data has led to more personal use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR). With “consumer empowerment” being an important issue of EHR, we are seeing a more “patient-centric” approach of EHR from countries around the world. Researchers have reported on issues in EHR sharing including concerns on privacy and security, consumer empowerment, competition among providers, and content standards. This study attempts to analyze prior research and to synthesize comprehensive, empirically-based conceptual models of EHR for personal use.
Methods We use “B2C(2B)” to represent this new behavior of EHR sharing and exchange, with “consumer” in the center stage.
ResultsBased on different information sharing mechanisms, we summarized the “B2C(2B)” behavior into three models, namely, the Inexpensive data media model, the Internet patient portal model and the Personal portable device model. Models each have their own strengths and weaknesses in their ways to share patient data and to address privacy and security concerns.
Conclusion Personal use of EHR under the B2C(2B) model does look promising based on our study. We started to observe a trend that governments around the world are embarking on related projects. With multiple stake-holders involved, we are only beginning to understand the complexity of such undertakings.
- 1 Siteman E, Businger A, Gandhi T, Grant R, Poon E, Schnipper J. et al. Clinicians Recognize Value of Patient Review of their Electronic Health Record Data. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006; 2006: 1101.
- 2 Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC. Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; Jan-Feb; 15 (01) 1-7.
- 3 Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 08: 299-308.
- 4 Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Zhou XA, McDonald CJ. A randomized trial of corollary orders to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 04: 364-75.
- 5 Bates DW, Evans RS, Murff H, Stetson PD, Pizziferri L, Hripcsak G. Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 115-28.
- 6 Bates DW. Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff 2005; 24: 1180-9.
- 7 Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, Girosi F, Meili R, Scoville R. et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings and costs. Health Aff 2005; 24: 1103-17.
- 8 Lobach DF, Detmer DE. Research challenges for electronic health records. Am J Prev Med 2007; May; 32 (5 Suppl): S104-11.
- 9 EHR Global Perspective. August 2008 version 1.0.1. Accessed June 7, 2009, from http://www.himss.org/content/files/200808_EHRGlobalPerspective_whitepaper.pdf
- 10 Jian WS, Hsu CY, Hao TH, Wen HC, Hsu MH, Lee YL. et al. Building a portable data and information interoperability infrastructure-framework for a standard Taiwan Electronic Medical Record Template. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2007; Nov; 88 (02) 102-11.
- 11 Establishing a Standardized Travelers’ Electronic Health Summary Template (TET) for the Asia-Pacific Region. Accessed June 7, 2009, from http://www.medinfo.org.tw/tet/
- 12 Wendling D. The German eHealth programme. Card Technology Today 2009; January; 21 (01) 10-1.
- 13 MyKAD-ONLINE: Bridging the gap to your future. Accessed June 7, 2009, from https://www.mykadonline.com.my/mykad.html
- 14 Greenhalgh T, Wood GW, Bratan T, Stramer K, Hinder S. Patients’ attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study. BMJ 2008; Jun 7; 336 7656 290-5. Epub 2008 May 29.
- 15 Lippert S, Kverneland A. The Danish National Health Informatics Strategy. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 95: 845-50.
- 16 IMIA-APAMI-AMIA-EFMI Project TrEHRT Viewer Demo. Accessed June 7, 2009, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROsaFHZaWGs
- 17 ASTM International: Standards Worldwide. Accessed June 6, 2009, from http://www.astm.org/
- 18 Care for safe and reliable information. Accessed June 7, 2009, from http://www.uziregister.nl/Images/UZI-folder_per_pagina_engels_tcm3817238.pdf
- 19 Zurita L, Nøhr C. Patient opinion—EHR assessment from the users perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107 (Pt 2): 1333-6.
- 20 Health Record Banking Alliance. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/materials/06_07/cps/hrba.pdf
- 21 Gold JD, Ball MJ. The health record banking imperative: a conceptual model. IBM Systems Journal 2007; 46 (01) 43-55.