CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2018; 07(03): 253-255
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1639386
Case Report
Neurological Surgeons' Society of India

Intraoperative Fluorescence Is Useful but Not Always Sufficient in Contrast-Enhancing Malignant Gliomas

Aliasgar V. Moiyadi
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 07 August 2017

accepted: 04 September 2017

Publication Date:
10 April 2018 (online)


Fluorescence-guided resections have become standard of care for malignant gliomas. Strong fluorescence has been shown to correlate with solid enhancing tumor. However, with experience it has also been shown that visualized fluorescence may not identify the entire extent of the tumor. Knowing that malignant gliomas extend beyond the contrast-enhancing tumor seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), reliance only on the fluorescence intraoperatively may not be enough. Intraoperative ultrasound is a readily available tool for real-time assessment of resection status, irrespective of the tumor type. We describe one such case in which after resecting all the visible fluorescing tumor component, we identified a significant component of nonfluorescing tumor, using intraoperative ultrasound that was further resected completely. This illustrates the need for multimodal intraoperative guidance for achieving optimal tumor resection in malignant gliomas.

  • References

  • 1 Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, Wiestler OD, Zanella F, Reulen HJ. ALA-Glioma Study Group. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7 (05) 392-401
  • 2 Aldave G, Tejada S, Pay E. et al. Prognostic value of residual fluorescent tissue in glioblastoma patients after gross total resection in 5-aminolevulinic Acid-guided surgery. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (06) 915-920 discussion 920–921
  • 3 Roberts DW, Valdés PA, Harris BT. et al. Coregistered fluorescence-enhanced tumor resection of malignant glioma: relationships between δ-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX fluorescence, magnetic resonance imaging enhancement, and neuropathological parameters. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (03) 595-603
  • 4 Schucht P, Knittel S, Slotboom J. et al. 5-ALA complete resections go beyond MR contrast enhancement: shift corrected volumetric analysis of the extent of resection in surgery for glioblastoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (02) 305-312 discussion 312
  • 5 Coburger J, Engelke J, Scheuerle A. et al. Tumor detection with 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence and Gd-DTPA-enhanced intraoperative MRI at the border of contrast-enhancing lesions: a prospective study based on histopathological assessment. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 36 (02) E3
  • 6 Stummer W, Tonn JC, Goetz C. et al. 5-Aminolevulinic acid-derived tumor fluorescence: the diagnostic accuracy of visible fluorescence qualities as corroborated by spectrometry and histology and postoperative imaging. Neurosurgery 2014; 74 (03) 310-319 discussion 319–320
  • 7 Sanai N, Snyder LA, Honea NJ. et al. Intraoperative confocal microscopy in the visualization of 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence in low-grade gliomas. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (04) 740-748
  • 8 Tsugu A, Ishizaka H, Mizokami Y. et al. Impact of the combination of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescence with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgery for glioma. World Neurosurg 2011; 76 (01) (02) 120-127
  • 9 Unsgaard G, Selbekk T, Brostrup MüllerT. et al. Ability of navigated 3D ultrasound to delineate gliomas and metastases—comparison of image interpretations with histopathology. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147 (12) 1259-1269 discussion 1269
  • 10 Moiyadi A, Shetty P. Navigable intraoperative ultrasound and fluorescence-guided resections are complementary in resection control of malignant gliomas: one size does not fit all. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75 (06) 434-441