CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2018; 97(S 02): S166
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1640286
Abstracts
Otologie: Otology
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effect of Electrode Position on Electrophysiological and Psychoacoustic Parameters in Cochlear Implant Patients with Lateral and Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays

C Degen
1  Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
,
A Büchner
1  Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
,
T Lenarz
1  Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 April 2018 (online)

 

Introduction:

The electrode position within the cochlea plays an important role for the interaction between electrode contacts and spiral ganglion cells. It is determined by the form of the electrode carrier. Straight electrode arrays (Nucleus™ 522 „SRA“) are pressed against the lateral wall of the cochlea, while precurved arrays (Nucleus™ 532 „SMA“ and 512 „Contour“) curl around the modiolus and ideally have no contact to the lateral wall. Recent improvements in postoperative CBCT (cone beam computational tomography) imaging resolution now allow accurate determination of the space between each electrode contact and the medial wall of the cochlea and to observe correlations between this distance and electrophysiological and psychophysical measurement values.

Methods:

Postoperative high resolution CBCT-images of 30 patients with Cochlear® Nucleus™ 532, 522 and 512 implants were evaluated using the Comet (Cochlea Measurement Tool) program to determine the distance between the 22 electrode contacts and the medial wall. During the first fitting week after the initial activation ECAPs, T- and C-levels and spread of excitation (SOE) were measured.

Results:

Patients with perimodiolar electrode arrays (Nucleus™ 532 and 512) had significantly lower ECAP thresholds, T- and C-levels as well as SOE widths than patients with the straight des Nucleus™ 522 implant.

Conclusion:

Our results show that the electrode position has a significant effect on both electrophysiological and psychophysical parameters. Low psychophysical thresholds are among other aspects relevant for prolonging battery life by decreasing energy consumption. No significant differences in speech test performance were notable at the end of the first fitting.