Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2019; 32(03): 259-268
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641142
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Efficacy and Safety of Hylan versus Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

Wen-Li Dai
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern Medical University, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, China
,
Ze-Ming Lin
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern Medical University, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, China
,
Dong-Hong Guo
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern Medical University, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, China
,
Zhan-Jun Shi
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern Medical University, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, China
,
Jian Wang
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern Medical University, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 October 2017

25 February 2018

Publication Date:
04 April 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use meta-analytic approach to compare the efficacy and safety of intraarticular hylan and hyaluronic acid (HA) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases through July 2017 to identify Level I randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated clinical efficacy and safety of hylan compared with HA for knee OA. The primary outcomes were Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, and WOMAC function scores. In each study and for the outcome measures (VAS for pain, WOMAC pain, function and stiffness scores, and Lequesne score), we calculated the treatment effect from the difference between the preintervention and postintervention changes in the hylan and HA groups. Twenty-one RCTs involving 3,058 patients were included. Pooled analysis suggested that compared with HA, hylan was associated with similar pain relief and function improvement in patients with knee OA (VAS for pain: mean difference [MD], –3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], –9.13 to 3.04; p = 0.33; I 2 = 76%. WOMAC pain score: MD, 0.23; 95% CI, –0.25 to 0.70; p = 0.35; I 2 = 0%. WOMAC function score: MD, –0.47; 95% CI, –6.81 to 5.88; p = 0.88; I 2 = 84%). No significant difference was found comparing the patients with treatment-related adverse events. The relationship was robust in sensitivity analysis and consistent in most of the subgroup analyses. As to the primary outcomes (WOMAC pain, function scores, VAS for pain), the difference between hylan and HA did not reach the previously reported minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values (–13.4 for VAS for pain, –2.0 for WOMAC pain score, –7.7 for WOMAC function score). Our meta-analysis showed that there were no statistically and clinically significant differences in pain relief and function improvement between hylan and HA injections for knee OA treatment. In view of its higher costs, we discourage the use of hylan in patients with knee OA in clinical practice. The level of evidence is I, meta-analysis of Level I studies.

Keywords

knee osteoarthritis - hyaluronic acid - hylan
 

  • References

  • 1 Haywood L, McWilliams DF, Pearson CI. , et al. Inflammation and angiogenesis in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48 (08) 2173-2177
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S. , et al. Knee replacement. Lancet 2012; 379 (9823): 1331-1340
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP. Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet 2011; 377 (9783): 2115-2126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Balazs EA, Watson D, Duff IF, Roseman S. Hyaluronic acid in synovial fluid. I. Molecular parameters of hyaluronic acid in normal and arthritis human fluids. Arthritis Rheum 1967; 10 (04) 357-376
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Gibbs DA, Merrill EW, Smith KA, Balazs EA. Rheology of hyaluronic acid. Biopolymers 1968; 6 (06) 777-791
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Balazs EA, Denlinger JL. Viscosupplementation: a new concept in the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl 1993; 39: 3-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT. , et al; American College of Rheumatology. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64 (04) 465-474
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC. , et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22 (03) 363-388
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Rutjes AW, Jüni P, da Costa BR, Trelle S, Nüesch E, Reichenbach S. Viscosupplementation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157 (03) 180-191
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bannuru RR, Natov NS, Obadan IE, Price LL, Schmid CH, McAlindon TE. Therapeutic trajectory of hyaluronic acid versus corticosteroids in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61 (12) 1704-1711
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Bellamy N, Campbell J, Robinson V, Gee T, Bourne R, Wells G. Viscosupplementation for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (02) CD005321
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Bannuru RR, Natov NS, Dasi UR, Schmid CH, McAlindon TE. Therapeutic trajectory following intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in knee osteoarthritis--meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19 (06) 611-619
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Reichenbach S, Blank S, Rutjes AW. , et al. Hylan versus hyaluronic acid for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57 (08) 1410-1418
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Adams ME, Atkinson MH, Lussier AJ. , et al. The role of viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a Canadian multicenter trial comparing hylan G-F 20 alone, hylan G-F 20 with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and NSAIDs alone. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1995; 3 (04) 213-225
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wobig M, Bach G, Beks P. , et al. The role of elastoviscosity in the efficacy of viscosupplementation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a comparison of hylan G-F 20 and a lower-molecular-weight hyaluronan. Clin Ther 1999; 21 (09) 1549-1562
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Schiavinato A, Finesso M, Cortivo R, Abatangelo G. Comparison of the effects of intra-articular injections of Hyaluronan and its chemically cross-linked derivative (Hylan G-F20) in normal rabbit knee joints. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2002; 20 (04) 445-454
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Zhao H, Liu H, Liang X, Li Y, Wang J, Liu C. Hylan G-F 20 versus low molecular weight hyaluronic acids for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. BioDrugs 2016; 30 (05) 387-396
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Pavelka K, Uebelhart D. Efficacy evaluation of highly purified intra-articular hyaluronic acid (Sinovial((R))) vs hylan G-F20 (Synvisc((R))) in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. A double-blind, controlled, randomized, parallel-group non-inferiority study. Osteoarthritis and cartilage / OARS. Osteoarthritis Res Soc 2011; 19: 1294-1300
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Sun SF, Hsu CW, Lin HS, Liou IH, Chen YH, Hung CL. Comparison of single intra-articular injection of novel hyaluronan (HYA-JOINT Plus) with Synvisc-One for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of efficacy and safety. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (06) 462-471
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Petrella RJ, Emans PJ, Alleyne J, Dellaert F, Gill DP, Maroney M. Safety and performance of Hydros and Hydros-TA for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind feasibility trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 57
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Higgins JPT, Green S. . Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org . Accessed November 1, 2017
    PubMed
  • 22 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D. , et al; Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29 (08) 1039-1049
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45 (05) 453-461
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Lequesne MG, Mery C, Samson M, Gerard P. Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Validation--value in comparison with other assessment tests. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1987; 65: 85-89
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Doganay Erdogan B, Leung YY, Pohl C, Tennant A, Conaghan PG. Minimal clinically important difference as applied in rheumatology: an OMERACT Rasch Working Group systematic review and critique. J Rheumatol 2016; 43 (01) 194-202
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10 (04) 407-415
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45 (04) 384-391
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Tubach F, Ravaud P, Martin-Mola E. , et al. Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: results from a prospective multinational study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64 (11) 1699-1707
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Hmamouchi I, Allali F, Tahiri L. , et al. Clinically important improvement in the WOMAC and predictor factors for response to non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritic patients: a prospective study. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 58
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327 (7414): 557-560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315 (7109): 629-634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50 (04) 1088-1101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Gigis I, Fotiadis E, Nenopoulos A, Tsitas K, Hatzokos I. Comparison of two different molecular weight intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Hippokratia 2016; 20 (01) 26-31
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Khanasuk Y, Dechmaneenin T, Tanavalee A. Prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of single 6-ml injection of hylan G-F 20 and hyaluronic acid for primary knee arthritis: a preliminary study. J Med Assoc Thai 2012; 95 (Suppl. 10) S92-S97
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Iannitti T, Rottigni V, Palmieri B. A pilot study to compare two different hyaluronic acid compounds for treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2012; 25 (04) 1093-1098
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Maheu E, Zaim M, Appelboom T. , et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of two different molecular weight (MW) hyaluronans F60027 and hylan G-F20 in symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee (KOA). Results of a non inferiority, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2011; 29 (03) 527-535
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Raman R, Dutta A, Day N, Sharma HK, Shaw CJ, Johnson GV. Efficacy of hylan G-F 20 and sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee -- a prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee 2008; 15 (04) 318-324
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Atay T, Aslan A, Baydar ML. , et al. The efficacy of low- and high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid applications after arthroscopic debridement in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica 2008; 42: 228-233
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Uluçay C, Altintaş F, Ugutmen E, Beksaç B. The use of arthroscopic debridement and viscosupplementation in knee osteoarthritis [in Turkish]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2007; 41 (05) 337-342
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Jüni P, Reichenbach S, Trelle S. , et al; Swiss Viscosupplementation Trial Group. Efficacy and safety of intraarticular hylan or hyaluronic acids for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56 (11) 3610-3619
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Kotevoglu N, Iyibozkurt PC, Hiz O, Toktas H, Kuran B. A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing the efficacy of different molecular weight hyaluronan solutions in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int 2006; 26 (04) 325-330
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Kirchner M, Marshall D. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing alternate forms of high molecular weight hyaluronan for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14 (02) 154-162
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Atamaz F, Kirazli Y, Akkoc Y. A comparison of two different intra-articular hyaluronan drugs and physical therapy in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int 2006; 26 (10) 873-878
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Rolf CG, Engstrom B, Ohrvik J. , et al. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of hyaluronan viscosupplements and placebo in patients with symptomatic and arthroscopy-verified cartilage pathology. J Clin Res 2005; 20 05: 15-32
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Karatosun V, Unver B, Gocen Z, Sen A. Comparison of two hyaluronan drugs in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with long term follow-up. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23 (02) 213-218
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Karatay S, Kiziltunc A, Yildirim K, Karanfil RC, Senel K. Effects of different hyaluronic acid products on synovial fluid levels of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2004; 34 (03) 330-335
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Bayramoğlu M, Karataş M, Cetin N, Akman N, Sözay S, Dilek A. Comparison of two different viscosupplements in knee osteoarthritis -- a pilot study. Clin Rheumatol 2003; 22 (02) 118-122
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Karlsson J, Sjögren LS, Lohmander LS. Comparison of two hyaluronan drugs and placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis. A controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design multicentre study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002; 41 (11) 1240-1248
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Hua L, Xin C, Fang SY. Viscosupplementation with sodium hyaluronate for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Modern Rehabil 2002; 6: 1202-1203
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Zhou G, Wang Y, Zhou Z. Comparison of two different molecular-weight of sodium hyaluronate on treatment of the osteoarthrosis. Acta Univ Med Second Shanghai 2000; 20: 361-363
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Adams ME. An analysis of clinical studies of the use of crosslinked hyaluronan, hylan, in the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl 1993; 39: 16-18
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Sato E, Ando T, Ichikawa J. , et al. High molecular weight hyaluronic acid increases the differentiation potential of the murine chondrocytic ATDC5 cell line. J Orthop Res 2014; 32 (12) 1619-1627
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Wang CT, Lin J, Chang CJ, Lin YT, Hou SM. Therapeutic effects of hyaluronic acid on osteoarthritis of the knee. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (03) 538-545
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Lohmander LS, Dalén N, Englund G. , et al; Hyaluronan Multicentre Trial Group. Intra-articular hyaluronan injections in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicentre trial. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55 (07) 424-431
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Kemper F, Gebhardt U, Meng T, Murray C. Tolerability and short-term effectiveness of hylan G-F 20 in 4253 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee in clinical practice. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21 (08) 1261-1269
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar