J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79(06): 464-470
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641147
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Optimized Screw Trajectory for Lumbar Cortical Bone Trajectory Pedicle Screws Based on Clinical Outcome: Evidence Favoring the Buttress Effect Theory

Shunji Asamoto*
1   Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kota Kojima*
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Japan
,
Michael Winking
3   ZW-O Spine Center Osnabrück, Osnabrueck, Germany
,
Andreas Jödicke
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Vivantes Klinikum Neukolln Klinik fur Innere Medizin Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Berlin, Germany
,
Masayuki Ishikawa
5   Spine and Spinal Cord Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
,
Shinichi Ishihara
5   Spine and Spinal Cord Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
,
Wolfgang Deinsberger
6   Department of Neurochirurgie, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany
,
Jun Muto
1   Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
,
Makoto Nishiyama
5   Spine and Spinal Cord Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 May 2016

06 June 2017

Publication Date:
30 April 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) is a relatively new technique for pedicle screw insertion in the field of spine surgery. Previous studies have demonstrated the significantly better pullout and toggle characteristics the new method offers, and it appears to have certain advantages over the widely used traditional trajectory. The mechanism of the pullout and toggle characteristics still remains unknown.

Purpose To report the medium- to long-term follow-up findings of patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion or posterior lumbar fusion (PLIF/PLF) at our institution and to discuss the ideal screw trajectory when using this technique.

Study Design Retrospective radiologic study.

Methods Fifty-five patients who underwent PLIF/PLF for lumbar spondylosis using the new technique between January 2011 and January 2016 were included. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores for low back pain and visual analog scale scores. Screw loosening was evaluated via the presence of a translucent zone surrounding the pedicle screw using plain X-radiography (Xp). The screw trajectory was evaluated by measuring the rostral range (RR) and the lateral range score (LRS). The RR is the angle between the line drawn along the distal end plate of the vertebra and the line drawn along the screw on the lateral view. The LRS is the score given depending on the position of the tip of the screw seen on the Xp taken in the anteroposterior (AP) view. The pedicle ring is equally divided into the medial third (zone A), central third (zone B), and the lateral third (zone C) by four vertical lines. A score of 0 to 3 points is given depending on the position of the tip of the screw: 0, outside the pedicle ring; 1, zone A; 2, zone B; and 3, zone C.

Results Bone fusion was recorded in 49 patients (49/55 patients). The total number of screws with a visible translucent zone on Xp was 26 (26/242 screws). When the screws are inserted at a more acute angle in the lateral view (low RR) or when the screws are directed more medially (low LRS), the risk of developing a translucent zone around the pedicle screw increased.

Conclusion With CBT, the pedicle screws are inserted from the pars interarticularis that is rich in cortical bone, strong enough to withstand the substantial forces usually encountered in the region. Our clinical data suggest that the optimal screw trajectory is one where the screw is inserted at an angle > 22.55 degrees (high RR) on the lateral view Xp and where the tip of the screw is directed toward the lateral third of the pedicle on the AP Xp. We believe the naturally occurring buttress effect that exists in the vertebra may give CBT a mechanical and anatomical advantage over the traditional screw trajectory.

* The authors contributed equally.


 
  • References

  • 1 Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC. , et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J 2009; 9 (05) 366-373
  • 2 Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M. , et al; Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation. JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions. April 16, 2007. J Orthop Sci 2009; 14 (03) 348-365
  • 3 Izumida S, Inoue S. Assessment of treatment for low back pain [in Japanese]. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1986; 60: 391-394
  • 4 Phan K, Hogan J, Maharaj M, Mobbs RJ. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a review of published reports. Orthop Surg 2015; 7 (03) 213-221
  • 5 Kojima K, Asamoto S, Kobayashi Y, Ishikawa M, Fukui Y. Cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory—a radiological evaluation of screw-bone contact. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157 (07) 1173-1178
  • 6 Troup JDG. Mechanical factors in spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; (117) 59-67
  • 7 Gallois M, Japiot M. Architecture intérieure des vertèbres (statique et physiologie de la colonne vertébrale). Rev Chir 1925; 63: 687-708
  • 8 Cyron BM, Hutton WC. Variations in the amount and distribution of cortical bone across the partes interarticulares of L5. A predisposing factor in spondylolysis?. Spine 1979; 4 (02) 163-167
  • 9 Krenz J, Troup JDG. The structure of the pars interarticularis of the lower lumbar vertebrae and its relation to the etiology of spondylolysis, with a report of a healing fracture in the neural arch of a fourth lumbar vertebra. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1973; 55 (04) 735-741