Benefits and Risks of Prophylactic Cerebrospinal Fluid Catheter and Evoked Potential Monitoring in Symptomatic Spinal Cord Ischemia Low-Risk Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Abstract

Background To assess risks and benefits of a standardized strategy to prevent symptomatic spinal cord ischemia (SSCI) after thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) using routine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) catheter placement and evoked potential (EP) monitoring.

Methods One hundred and ninety-five patients underwent 223 SSCI low-risk TEVAR procedures between 1998 and 2014. CSF catheter was used to measure CSF pressure and drain CSF if necessary throughout the procedure and up to 24 hours thereafter. EPs were used to monitor spinal cord integrity throughout the procedure.

Results Underlying pathologies included descending thoracic aortic aneurysm in 115 (52%), type B aortic dissection in 85 (38%), traumatic aortic rupture in 16 (7%), and others in 7 (3%) patients. CSF catheter was inserted before TEVAR in 116 procedures (52%). Active CSF draining was required in 29 patients (25%). The CSF catheter caused no major and 11 (10%) minor complications. EP were monitored during 88 (40%) procedures. We observed a reduction in the amplitude, prolonged latencies, or complete signal loss in nine procedures. There were no EP monitoring-related complications. SSCI incidence was higher in patients without CSF drainage (0.8% vs 4.7%, p = 0.031).

Conclusion Use of CSF drainage is associated with a significant lower incidence of SSCI after SSCI low-risk TEVAR than nonuse, whereas the complication rate associated with CSF drainage insertion or removal is very low. Routine EP monitoring is a useful tool to detect immediate arterial inflow obstruction to the spinal cord. The combination of these two methods serves as a safe and reliable standardized strategy in reducing the incidence of SSCI to a minimum.

Keywords

thoracic endovascular aortic repair - cerebrospinal fluid - cerebrospinal fluid catheter - evoked potential monitoring - symptomatic spinal cord ischemia

• References

• 1 Maeda T, Yoshitani K, Sato S. , et al. Spinal cord ischemia after endovascular aortic repair versus open surgical repair for descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism. J Anesth 2012; 26 (06) 805-811
• 2 Uchida N. How to prevent spinal cord injury during endovascular repair of thoracic aortic disease. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62 (07) 391-397
• 3 Etz CD, Weigang E, Hartert M. , et al. Contemporary spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery and endovascular aortic repair: a position paper of the vascular domain of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 47 (06) 943-957
• 4 Wong CS, Healy D, Canning C, Coffey JC, Boyle JR, Walsh SR. A systematic review of spinal cord injury and cerebrospinal fluid drainage after thoracic aortic endografting. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56 (05) 1438-1447
• 5 MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 19 (05) 416-429
• 6 Czerny M, Eggebrecht H, Sodeck G. , et al. Mechanisms of symptomatic spinal cord ischemia after TEVAR: insights from the European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications (EuREC). J Endovasc Ther 2012; 19 (01) 37-43
• 7 Szeto WY, Bavaria JE. Hybrid repair of aortic arch aneurysms: combined open arch reconstruction and endovascular repair. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 21 (04) 347-354
• 8 Hnath JC, Mehta M, Taggert JB. , et al. Strategies to improve spinal cord ischemia in endovascular thoracic aortic repair: outcomes of a prospective cerebrospinal fluid drainage protocol. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48 (04) 836-840
• 9 Hanna JM, Andersen ND, Aziz H, Shah AA, McCann RL, Hughes GC. Results with selective preoperative lumbar drain placement for thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95 (06) 1968-1974 , discussion 1974–1975
• 10 Wynn MM, Mell MW, Tefera G, Hoch JR, Acher CW. Complications of spinal fluid drainage in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a report of 486 patients treated from 1987 to 2008. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49 (01) 29-34 , discussion 34–35
• 11 Weigang E, Hartert M, Siegenthaler MP. , et al. Perioperative management to improve neurologic outcome in thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic stent-grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82 (05) 1679-1687
• 12 Matsuda H, Fukuda T, Iritani O. , et al. Spinal cord injury is not negligible after TEVAR for lower descending aorta. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 39 (02) 179-186
• 13 Banga PV, Oderich GS, Reis de Souza L. , et al. Neuromonitoring, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and selective use of iliofemoral conduits to minimize risk of spinal cord injury during complex endovascular aortic repair. J Endovasc Ther 2016; 23 (01) 139-149
• 14 Arora H, Ullery BW, Kumar PA, Cheung AT. Pro: Patients at risk for spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repairs should receive prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29 (05) 1376-1380
• 15 Isaak RS, Furman W. Con: Patients at risk for spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repairs should not receive prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29 (05) 1381-1383