Surgical Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis: A Single Tertiary Center Experience
Background Although surgery is the sole therapeutic option for patients with constrictive pericarditis (CP), reports on high postoperative mortality rates have led to hesitant surgery referral. The aim of this study was to report the short- and long-term outcomes of surgical pericardiectomy (SP) from a large tertiary center.
Methods Between January 2005 and January 2017, 55 consecutive patients underwent SP after comprehensive echocardiography, computed tomography, and hemodynamic studies. Detailed clinical, imaging, surgical techniques and follow-up outcomes were recorded.
Results The most common etiology was idiopathic (n = 27, 49%) and 33 patients (60%) were in functional class 3/4. Sixteen patients (29%) underwent concomitant interventions during SP, and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was used in these, as well as in four additional cases. Complete resection, independent of CPB, was achieved in 96%. One patient died during the index hospitalization, and four (7%) needed re-explorations due to bleeding. While 12 patients (22%) died during a mean follow-up of 52 ± 39 months, only 1 death was due to right heart failure. Functional class significantly improved (with a p-value < 0.001), diuretics were discontinued in all, and significant reductions of right atrial pressures were recorded. None of these outcomes differed as a result of concomitant interventions at the time of SP.
Conclusion Short- and long-term outcomes of SP, performed either alone or concomitantly with other procedures, indicate high safety and favorable clinical and hemodynamic efficacy for the treatment of CP.
Eingereicht: 09. Dezember 2017
Angenommen: 14. März 2018
27. Mai 2018 (online)
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
- 1 Somerville W. Constrictive pericarditis. With special reference to the change in natural history brought about by surgical intervention. Circulation 1968; 38 (1, Suppl): 102-110
- 2 Myers RB, Spodick DH. Constrictive pericarditis: clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics. Am Heart J 1999; 138 (2 Pt 1): 219-232
- 3 Delorme E. Sur un Traitement Chirurgical de la Symphyse Cordo-Pericardique. Bull Soc Chir Paris 1898; 24: 918-922
- 4 Rehn L. Die Perikardialen Verwachsungen im Kindesalter. Arch Kinderheilkd 1920; 68: 179
- 5 Churchill ED. Decortication of the heart (Delorme) for adhesive pericarditis. Arch Surg 1929; 19: 1457-1467
- 6 Blalock A, Burwell CS. Chronic pericardial disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1941; 73: 433
- 7 DeValeria PA, Baumgartner WA, Casale AS. et al. Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 52 (02) 219-224
- 8 McCaughan BC, Schaff HV, Piehler JM. et al. Early and late results of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 89 (03) 340-350
- 9 Seifert FC, Miller DC, Oesterle SN, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Shumway NE. Surgical treatment of constrictive pericarditis: analysis of outcome and diagnostic error. Circulation 1985; 72 (3 Pt 2): II264-II273
- 10 Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV. et al. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation 1999; 100 (13) 1380-1386
- 11 Bertog SC, Thambidorai SK, Parakh K. et al. Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43 (08) 1445-1452
- 12 Choi JH, Choi JO, Ryu DR. et al. Mitral and tricuspid annular velocities in constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: correlation with pericardial thickness on computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4 (06) 567-575
- 13 Welch TD, Ling LH, Espinosa RE. et al. Echocardiographic diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis: Mayo Clinic criteria. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7 (03) 526-534
- 14 Chowdhury UK, Subramaniam GK, Kumar AS. et al. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: a clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic evaluation of two surgical techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81 (02) 522-529
- 15 Tuna IC, Danielson GK. Surgical management of pericardial diseases. Cardiol Clin 1990; 8 (04) 683-696
- 16 Omoto T, Minami K, Varvaras D, Böthig D, Körfer R. Radical pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2001; 9: 286-290
- 17 Copeland JG, Stinson EB, Griepp RB, Shumway NE. Surgical treatment of chronic constrictive pericarditis using cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975; 69 (02) 236-238
- 18 Trotter MC, Chung KC, Ochsner JL, McFadden PM. Pericardiectomy for pericardial constriction. Am Surg 1996; 62 (04) 304-307
- 19 Culliford AT, Lipton M, Spencer FC. Operation for chronic constrictive pericarditis: do the surgical approach and degree of pericardial resection influence the outcome significantly?. Ann Thorac Surg 1980; 29 (02) 146-152
- 20 Nataf P, Cacoub P, Dorent R. et al. Results of subtotal pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993; 7 (05) 252-255 , discussion 255–256
- 21 Bashi VV, John S, Ravikumar E, Jairaj PS, Shyamsunder K, Krishnaswami S. Early and late results of pericardiectomy in 118 cases of constrictive pericarditis. Thorax 1988; 43 (08) 637-641
- 22 Astudillo R, Ivert T. Late results after pericardectomy for constrictive pericarditis via left thoracotomy. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 23 (02) 115-119
- 23 Clare GC, Troughton RW. Management of constrictive pericarditis in the 21st century. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2007; 9 (06) 436-442