Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2017; 14(02/03): 135-141
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1649281
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Understanding the Presentations and Patterns of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries to Develop the Data Collection Format

Ranabir Pal
1   Department of Community Medicine, MGM Medical College and LSK Hospital, Kishanganj, Bihar, India
,
Mithasha Singh
2   Department of Community Medicine, DRPGMC, Kangra, Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
,
Kiran Kumar
3   Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Narayana Medical College Hospital, Chinthareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
,
Vinay Sagar Sharma
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Mahadevappa Rampure Medical College, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India
,
Mundlapudi Jahanavi
5   Department of Neurosurgery, Narayana Medical College Hospital, Chinthareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
,
Ranjan Kumar Jena
5   Department of Neurosurgery, Narayana Medical College Hospital, Chinthareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
,
Ashok Munivenkatappa
6   Scientist C, VRDL project, National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Prashant Bhandarkar
7   Department of Statistics, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Amit Agrawal
5   Department of Neurosurgery, Narayana Medical College Hospital, Chinthareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 22 August 2017

Accepted: 18 January 2018

Publication Date:
15 May 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background The intensity of the damage to the nerve fibers is not measured through the severity of the spinal cord injury.

Objective To understand the pattern of neurologic features in traumatic spinal cord injuries.

Methods This was a case series of the total care of patients with consecutive acute spinal cord injury at different levels during the years 2015 to 2017, from extrication and transportation following the accident to death, or the completion of primary definitive rehabilitation. This work examined demographic and clinical characteristics of 220 consecutive cases of acute spinal injuries with or without neurologic symptoms subjected to conservative and surgical interventions. Age, sex, addiction patterns of smoking and alcohol, presenting symptoms, neurologic status, and postoperative outcomes are compared with the preoperative findings.

Results The registry included 220 patients with spinal injury; majority in 41 to 50 years age group (28.6%) and males (77.7%). Nearly one-half had cervical (46.3%) injuries; 84.3% male; comparable proportion of dorsal and lumbar injuries had male dominance. One-fifth of the patients were smokers and alcoholics, all males. Mean hospital stay was 36.7 ± 140.5 days. Majority presented with neck pain (48.9%), radicular pain (56.4%), limb weakness (73.3%), and tingling sensation (47.7%); 14.4% reported tightness in limbs and 18.8% bladder involvement. In postoperative period, symptoms persisted in varied proportions. Significantly of postoperative neck pain was observed more among males (88.5%), yet symptoms that reduced postoperatively were neck pain, limb weakness, and tingling sensation. However, bladder involvement increased significantly.

Conclusion The results showed that greater attention should be paid to older and male population that has more spinal cord injuries while comparable to those of the other studies in neurodeficits and clinical features.

 
  • References

  • 1 Spinal Cord Injury. http://www.neurogenbsi.com/spinal-cord-injury-treatment-in-india/
  • 2 Dincer F, Oflazer A, Beyazova M, Celiker R, Basgöze O, Altioklar K. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in Turkey. Paraplegia 1992; 30 (09) 641-646
  • 3 Kristinsdottir EA, Knutsdottir S, Sigvaldason K, Jonsson Jr H, Ingvarsson PE. [Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in Iceland from 1975 to 2014]. Laeknabladid 2016; 102 (11) 491-496
  • 4 Wang H, Xiang Q, Li C, Zhou Y. Epidemiology of traumatic cervical spinal fractures and risk factors for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury in China. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; 26 (08) E306-E313
  • 5 Oliver M, Inaba K, Tang A. et al. The changing epidemiology of spinal trauma: a 13-year review from a Level I trauma centre. Injury 2012; 43 (08) 1296-1300
  • 6 Liu P, Yao Y, Liu MY. et al. Spinal trauma in mainland China from 2001 to 2007: an epidemiological study based on a nationwide database. Spine 2012; 37 (15) 1310-1315
  • 7 Ning GZ, Yu TQ, Feng SQ. et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Tianjin, China. Spinal Cord 2011; 49 (03) 386-390
  • 8 Lenehan B, Street J, Kwon BK. et al. The epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in British Columbia, Canada. Spine 2012; 37 (04) 321-329
  • 9 Knútsdóttir S, Thórisdóttir H, Sigvaldason K, Jónsson Jr H, Björnsson A, Ingvarsson P. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injuries in Iceland from 1975 to 2009. Spinal Cord 2012; 50 (02) 123-126
  • 10 Leucht P, Fischer K, Muhr G, Mueller EJ. Epidemiology of traumatic spine fractures. Injury 2009; 40 (02) 166-172
  • 11 Botterell EH, Jousse AT, Kraus AS, Thompson MG, WynneJones M, Geisler WO. A model for the future care of acute spinal cord injuries. Can J Neurol Sci 1975; 2 (04) 361-380