Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie 2018; 15(02): e27
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1651745
Abstracts
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Association of clinical/pathological parameters with axillary involvement in early breast cancer in patients with limited sentinel node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)

HC Kolberg
1   Marienhospital Bottrop gGmbH, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Bottrop, Deutschland
,
C Liedtke
2   Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland
,
I Bauerfeind
3   Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Deutschland
,
TN Fehm
4   Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
,
B Fleige
5   HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Deutschland
,
M Hauschild
6   Frauenklinik Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Deutschland
,
G Helms
7   Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
,
A Lebeau
8   Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
,
S Schmatloch
9   Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland
,
P Schrenk
10   AKH Linz, Linz, Österreich
,
L Schwentner
11   Gynova, Reith, Österreich
,
A Stäbler
7   Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
,
G von Minckwitz
12   GBG, Neu-Isenburg, Deutschland
,
S Loibl
12   GBG, Neu-Isenburg, Deutschland
,
M Untch
5   HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Deutschland
,
T Kühn
13   Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 May 2018 (online)

 

Background:

The association of clinical/pathological parameters and residual axillary involvement after NACT is still not sufficiently defined. We used data from the SENTINA trial to analyze this association in a patient population with limited sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement.

Methods:

Patients were included if before NACT they presented with a clinically negative axilla but showed involvement of < 3 SLNs prior to NACT (Arm B). The association between clinical/pathological parameters and axillary involvement after NACT was analyzed.

Results:

265 of the 360 patients in arm B of the SENTINA were included. After NACT 66/265 (24.9%) patients had involved SLNs or non-SLNs; 71/265 (26.8%) achieved a pCR in the breast. We observed a significant association between pCR in the breast and ER negativity (p < 0.0001), PR negativity (p < 0.0001) and triple negative (TN) status (p = 0.001). However, no statistically significant association between residual axillary involvement after NACT and ER (p = 0.381), PR (p = 0.52), HER2 (p = 0.771), TN status (p = 0.937), grade (G) 1 (p = 0.081), G 2 (p = 0.335), G 3 (p = 0.747), age (p = 0.789), tumor size before NACT (p = 0.761) and pCR in the breast (p = 0.136) could be demonstrated.

Conclusion:

We found no association between residual axillary involvement after NACT and clinical/pathological parameters and we could not identify a subset of patients for whom axillary treatment after NACT could be safely omitted if SLNs were positive prior to therapy even in cases of limited SLN involvement.