Rehabilitation after Clipping of Cerebral Aneurysms without Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Outcome Analysis of 100 Consecutive Cases

Abstract

Background Discharge to rehabilitation is reported in large studies as one important outcome parameter based on hospital codes. Because neurologic outcome scores (e.g., the modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) are missing in International Classification of Diseases (ICD) databases, rehabilitation indirectly serves as a kind of surrogate parameter for overall outcome. Reported fractions of patients with rehabilitation, however, largely differ between studies and seem high for patients with aneurysm clipping. Variances in rehabilitation fractions seem to largely differ between treatments (clipping versus coiling) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms, so we analyzed our patients for percentage of and potential factors predicting rehabilitation.

Patients From July 2007 to September 2013, 100 consecutive patients with at least one cerebral aneurysm underwent aneurysm clipping. Aneurysms were classified as incidental, associated, pretreated (coil compaction after subarachnoid hemorrhage), and symptomatic (oculomotor nerve compression, microemboli), and they were assigned to their anatomical location. Complications (infection, hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, transient and permanent neurologic deficit, reoperation) and outcome (mRS at 6 months; clip occlusion rate by postoperative digital subtraction angiography) as well as frequency and type of rehabilitation were analyzed and correlated retrospectively. Multiple aneurysms clipped in one procedure were not counted separately regarding complications or outcome (i.e., one patient, one outcome).

Results The overall complication rate was 17% including 10% early and 3% permanent neurologic deficits and 7% reoperations. There were no deaths. Overall, 98% of patients had a good outcome (mRS 0–2). Clip occlusion rate was 97.9%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified aneurysm location as the only significant independent factor for risk of complication (p < 0.001) and complication as the only significant independent risk factor for rehabilitation (p = 0.003). Rehabilitation was indicated or requested by the patient as early neurologic rehabilitation (5%), inpatient follow-up (15%), and outpatient follow-up (15%). The long-term care rate was 2%.

Conclusion Microsurgery of unruptured and not acutely ruptured aneurysms (including post-coil and associated aneurysms) has a low rate of rehabilitation with a low risk of a permanent neurologic deficit, long-term care, or early neurologic rehabilitation. The rate of rehabilitation is well below reported risks from studies based on ICD-based health care analysis. Rehabilitation per se is not a good indicator for outcome.

Keywords

aneurysm - cerebral - rehabilitation - long-term care

Note

Data from this study were presented at the annual meeting of the German Neurosurgical Society (DGNC) 2016.

• References

• 1 Bekelis K, Missios S, Coy S, Singer RJ, MacKenzie TA. New York State: comparison of treatment outcomes for unruptured cerebral aneurysms using an instrumental variable analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4 (07) e002190-e002197
• 2 Bekelis K, Gottlieb DJ, Su Y. , et al. Comparison of clipping and coiling in elderly patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (03) 811-818
• 3 McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Fan J, Kallmes DF, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ. Comparative effectiveness of unruptured cerebral aneurysm therapies: propensity score analysis of clipping versus coiling. Stroke 2013; 44 (04) 988-994
• 4 Higashida RT, Lahue BJ, Torbey MT, Hopkins LN, Leip E, Hanley DF. Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28 (01) 146-151
• 5 Jalbert JJ, Isaacs AJ, Kamel H, Sedrakyan A. Clipping and coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms among Medicare beneficiaries, 2000 to 2010. Stroke 2015; 46 (09) 2452-2457
• 6 Morgan MK, Wiedmann M, Assaad NN, Heller GZ. Complication-effectiveness analysis for unruptured intracranial aneurysm surgery: a prospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 2016; 78 (05) 648-659
• 7 Abdulrauf SI, Vuong P, Patel R. , et al. “Awake” clipping of cerebral aneurysms: report of initial series. J Neurosurg 2017; 127 (02) 311-318
• 8 Bederson JB, Awad IA, Wiebers DO. , et al. Recommendations for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association. Stroke 2000; 31 (11) 2742-2750
• 9 King Jr JT, Berlin JA, Flamm ES. Morbidity and mortality from elective surgery for asymptomatic, unruptured, intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 1994; 81 (06) 837-842
• 10 International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms—risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med 1998; 339 (24) 1725-1733
• 11 Gerlach R, Beck J, Setzer M. , et al. Treatment related morbidity of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: results of a prospective single centre series with an interdisciplinary approach over a 6 year period (1999–2005). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78 (08) 864-871
• 12 Seule MA, Stienen MN, Gautschi OP. , et al. Surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in a low-volume hospital—outcome and review of literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012; 114 (06) 668-672
• 13 Thines L, Bourgeois P, Lejeune J-P. Surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the ISAT and ISUIA era. Can J Neurol Sci 2012; 39 (02) 174-179