Thromb Haemost 1997; 77(04): 637-640
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1656025
Clinical Studies
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Diagnostic Value of a New Sensitive Membrane Based Technique for Instantaneous D-Dimer Evaluation in Patients with Clinically Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis

Authors

  • Christophe Leroyer

    1   The Department of Chest Diseases and Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
  • Martine Escoffre

    2   The Department of Haematology, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
  • Emmanuelle Le Moigne

    1   The Department of Chest Diseases and Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
  • Marc Grimaux

    3   The Serbio Research Laboratory, Genevilliers, France
  • Olivier Cagnioncle

    1   The Department of Chest Diseases and Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
  • Emmanuel Oger

    1   The Department of Chest Diseases and Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
  • Luc Bressollette

    1   The Department of Chest Diseases and Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
  • Jean-François Abgrall

    2   The Department of Haematology, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
  • Jean Amiral

    3   The Serbio Research Laboratory, Genevilliers, France
  • Dominique Mottier

    1   The Department of Chest Diseases and Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
Further Information

Publication History

Received 30 July 1996

Accepted after resubmission 09 December 1996

Publication Date:
26 July 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

Background: Plasma D-Dimer analysis, using ELISA assays, has demonstrated in previous studies a high sensitivity, suggesting its utility in excluding deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Aim: To assess the performance of a new rapid plasma D-Dimer ELISA measurement in suspected DVT patients with recent clinical signs, not exceeding one week. Methods: A prospective study of patients admitted for a suspected recent DVT. Contrast venography or compression ultrasonography were performed within 24 h of admission. A new membrane based ELISA technique, which uses an immunofiltration and two complementary monoclonal antibodies was tested. Results were expressed as positive or negative. A standard plasma D-Dimer ELISA measurement was also performed. D-Dimer performances were assessed at the end of the study. Results: 265/448 patients had a proven DVT (72 distal, 193 proximal). The sensitivity of the instantaneous method in the diagnosis of overall DVT is 92 ± 3.4% (95% Cl), and specificity is 36.6 ± 6.9%. Positive predictive value is 67.7 ± 4.8% and negative predictive value is 76.1 ± 8.9%. Sensitivity and negative predictive values reach 97.9 and 94.3% in the diagnosis of proximal DVT, but only 76.3 and 79.7% in the diagnosis of distal DVT. Similar results are observed with the standard ELISA method. Conclusion: This new rapid plasma D-Dimer measurement appears highly sensitive, and could substitute the older ELISA methods. Both methods provide lower sensitivity in the case of a distal DVT location.