Thromb Haemost 1982; 47(01): 036-040
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1657120
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Comparative Study of the Activity of High and Low Molecular Weight Urokinase in the Presence of Fibrin

M Samama
1   The Laboratoire Central d'Hématologie, Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France
,
M Castel
1   The Laboratoire Central d'Hématologie, Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France
,
O Matsuo
2   The Department of Physiology, Miyazaki Medical College, Miyazaki, Japan
,
M Hoylaerts
3   The Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, Department of Medical Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
H R Lijnen
3   The Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, Department of Medical Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 19 August 1981

Accepted 16 December 1981

Publication Date:
13 July 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

The fibrinolytic or thrombolytic activity of low molecular weight urokinase (LMW-UK) and high molecular weight urokinase (HMW-UK) is not significantly different when measured in a bovine fibrin plate method, in a circulating plasma system containing a 125I-labelled human fibrin clot, or on 125I-fibrin films in culture plates using normal or α2-antiplasmin depleted human plasma.

In a human fibrin plate method however HMW-UK was found to be more active than LMW-UK. In a purified system on human 125I-fibrin films the activation of native or modified human plasminogen by HMW-UK was also found to be more effective than by LMW-UK.

Using a clot lysis test system we did not observe a different inhibition of LMW-UK and HMW-UK upon incubation in human plasma. This is in contrast with previous reports that HMW-UK is inhibited more rapidly in human plasma than LMW-UK.

In a purified system the inhibition rate of LMW-UK and HMW-UK by α2-antiplasmin is the same (rate constants at 25ΰC of 167 ± 9 M−1s−1 and 171 ± 5 M−1s−1 respectively).

The clinical trials available at present used doses of urokinase which were in excess of those required to obtain a maximal fibrinolytic effect. This might explain why in these trials no difference was observed between the thrombolytic effect of LMW-UK and HMW-UK, while in vitro HMW-UK appeared to be more effective. However, one should always be careful to extrapolate in vitro observations as such to the in vivo situation encountered during thrombolytic therapy.