Disorders of Consciousness: Ethical Issues of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostication

Abstract

Consciousness defines our humanity more than any other biologic phenomena that a clinician might be called upon to examine, diagnose, or treat. When family comes to the bedside of a patient, they hope to find them talking, thinking, and feeling. The complexity of consciousness allows an expansive gradation of dysfunction such that we must consider numerous potential insults, possible interventions, and often an unknown likelihood of recovery. As value-laden questions are more often in the hands of surrogate decision makers, the neurologist is given the herculean task of not only diagnosing and treating alterations of consciousness but also predicting the likely course of the disease to empower surrogates to make a choice most consistent with the preferences of the patient. The degree of uncertainty in the diagnosis and prognosis demands that the clinician consider the ethics of the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostication of disorders of consciousness. Expectations of acute and chronic care, the extent of the formal neurological investigation, the potential of therapeutic trials, the self-fulfilling prophecy that can occur with prognostication, and the challenges of shared decision making are all subjects that we explore.

Keywords

ethics - prognostication - devastating brain injury - disorders of consciousness - coma - vegetative state

• References

• 1 Posner JB, Saper CB, Schiff N, Plum F. Plum and Posner's Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008
• 2 Edlow BL, Takahashi E, Wu O. , et al. Neuroanatomic connectivity of the human ascending arousal system critical to consciousness and its disorders. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2012; 71 (06) 531-546
• 3 Souter MJ, Blissitt PA, Blosser S. , et al. Recommendations for the critical care management of devastating brain injury: prognostication, psychosocial, and ethical management: a position statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care 2015; 23 (01) 4-13
• 4 Jennett B, Adams JH, Murray LS, Graham DI. Neuropathology in vegetative and severely disabled patients after head injury. Neurology 2001; 56 (04) 486-490
• 5 Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1972; 1 (7753): 734-737
• 6 Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med 1994; 330 (21) 1499-1508
• 7 Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F. , et al; European Task Force on Disorders of Consciousness. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 2010; 8: 68
• 8 Young GB, Owen AM. Evaluating the potential for recovery of consciousness in the intensive care unit. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2015; 21 (5 Neurocritical Care): 1397-1410
• 9 Giancino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N. , et al. The minimally conscious state. Neurology 2002; 58 (03) 349-353
• 10 Bruno M-A, Majerus S, Boly M. , et al. Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J Neurol 2012; 259 (06) 1087-1098
• 11 Childs NL, Mercer WN, Childs HW. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology 1993; 43 (08) 1465-1467
• 12 Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J. , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 2009; 9: 35
• 13 Wade DT. How often is the diagnosis of the permanent vegetative state incorrect? A review of the evidence. Eur J Neurol 2018; 25 (04) 619-625
• 14 Seel RT, Sherer M, Whyte J. , et al; American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Injury-Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, Disorders of Consciousness Task Force. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91 (12) 1795-1813
• 15 Cruse D, Chennu S, Chatelle C. , et al. Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study. Lancet 2011; 378 (9809): 2088-2094
• 16 Wade D. Back to the bedside? Making clinical decisions in patients with prolonged unconsciousness. J Med Ethics 2017; 43 (07) 457-458
• 17 Naccache L. Minimally conscious state or cortically mediated state?. Brain 2018; 141 (04) 949-960
• 18 Fischer DB, Truog RD. What is a reflex? A guide for understanding disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2015; 85 (06) 543-548
• 19 DeVolder AG, Goffinet AM, Bol A, Michel C, de Barsy T, Laterre C. Brain glucose metabolism in postanoxic syndrome. Positron emission tomographic study. Arch Neurol 1990; 47 (02) 197-204
• 20 Laureys S, Goldman S, Phillips C. , et al. Impaired effective cortical connectivity in vegetative state: preliminary investigation using PET. Neuroimage 1999; 9 (04) 377-382
• 21 Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, Pickard JD. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 2006; 313 (5792): 1402
• 22 Gosseries O, Di H, Laureys S, Boly M. Measuring consciousness in severely damaged brains. Annu Rev Neurosci 2014; 37: 457-478
• 23 Thibaut A, Bruno M-A, Chatelle C. , et al. Metabolic activity in external and internal awareness networks in severely brain-damaged patients. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44 (06) 487-494
• 24 Boly M, Faymonville M-E, Peigneux P. , et al. Cerebral processing of auditory and noxious stimuli in severely brain injured patients: differences between VS and MCS. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2005; 15 (3-4): 283-289
• 25 Coleman MR, Davis MH, Rodd JM. , et al. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain 2009; 132 (Pt 9): 2541-2552
• 26 Landsness E, Bruno M-A, Noirhomme Q. , et al. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioural changes in vigilance in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Brain 2011; 134 (Pt 8): 2222-2232
• 27 Lehembre R, Marie-Aurélie B, Vanhaudenhuyse A. , et al. Resting-state EEG study of comatose patients: a connectivity and frequency analysis to find differences between vegetative and minimally conscious states. Funct Neurol 2012; 27 (01) 41-47
• 28 Qin P, Di H, Yan X. , et al. Mismatch negativity to the patient's own name in chronic disorders of consciousness. Neurosci Lett 2008; 448 (01) 24-28
• 29 Bekinschtein TA, Dehaene S, Rohaut B, Tadel F, Cohen L, Naccache L. Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106 (05) 1672-1677
• 30 Chillura A, Naro A, Micchia K, Bramanti A, Bramanti P, Calabrò RS. The value of midbrain morphology in predicting prognosis in chronic disorders of consciousness: a preliminary ultrasound study. J Neurol Sci 2017; 380: 46-50
• 31 Rodriguez Moreno D, Schiff ND, Giacino J, Kalmar K, Hirsch J. A network approach to assessing cognition in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2010; 75 (21) 1871-1878
• 32 Norton L, Hutchison RM, Young GB, Lee DH, Sharpe MD, Mirsattari SM. Disruptions of functional connectivity in the default mode network of comatose patients. Neurology 2012; 78 (03) 175-181
• 33 Fernández-Espejo D, Bekinschtein T, Monti MM. , et al. Diffusion weighted imaging distinguishes the vegetative state from the minimally conscious state. Neuroimage 2011; 54 (01) 103-112
• 34 Bardin JC, Fins JJ, Katz DI. , et al. Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury. Brain 2011; 134 (Pt 3): 769-782
• 35 Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR. , et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (07) 579-589
• 36 Naci L, Owen AM. Making every word count for nonresponsive patients. JAMA Neurol 2013; 70 (10) 1235-1241
• 37 Schnakers C, Perrin F, Schabus M. , et al. Voluntary brain processing in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2008; 71 (20) 1614-1620
• 38 Fins JJ, Master MG, Gerber LM, Giacino JT. The minimally conscious state: a diagnosis in search of an epidemiology. Arch Neurol 2007; 64 (10) 1400-1405
• 39 Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Chatfield DA. , et al. Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75 (01) 161-162
• 40 Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, Manley G, Stocchetti N, Murray G. The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13 (08) 844-854
• 41 Stead LG, Wijdicks EFM, Bhagra A. , et al. Validation of a new coma scale, the FOUR score, in the emergency department. Neurocrit Care 2009; 10 (01) 50-54
• 42 Fischer M, Rüegg S, Czaplinski A. , et al. Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 2010; 14 (02) R64
• 43 Wijdicks EFM, Rabinstein AA, Bamlet WR, Mandrekar JN. FOUR score and Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome of comatose patients: a pooled analysis. Neurology 2011; 77 (01) 84-85
• 44 Wannez S, Heine L, Thonnard M, Gosseries O, Laureys S. ; Coma Science Group collaborators. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2017; 81 (06) 883-889
• 45 Hemphill III JC, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2001; 32 (04) 891-897
• 46 Hemphill III JC, Farrant M, Neill Jr TA. Prospective validation of the ICH Score for 12-month functional outcome. Neurology 2009; 73 (14) 1088-1094
• 47 Zahuranec DB, Morgenstern LB, Sánchez BN, Resnicow K, White DB, Hemphill III JC. Do-not-resuscitate orders and predictive models after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2010; 75 (07) 626-633
• 48 Morgenstern LB, Zahuranec DB, Sánchez BN. , et al. Full medical support for intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2015; 84 (17) 1739-1744
• 49 Harvey D, Butler J, Groves J. , et al. Management of perceived devastating brain injury after hospital admission: a consensus statement from stakeholder professional organizations. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120 (01) 138-145
• 50 Rubin MA. The collaborative autonomy model of medical decision-making. Neurocrit Care 2014; 20 (02) 311-318
• 51 Murray E, Pollack L, White M, Lo B. Clinical decision-making: physicians' preferences and experiences. BMC Fam Pract 2007; 8: 10
• 52 Suppes A, Fins JJ. Surrogate expectations in severe brain injury. Brain Inj 2013; 27 (10) 1141-1147
• 53 Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166 (05) 493-497
• 54 Bravo G, Sene M, Arcand M. Making medical decisions for an incompetent older adult when both a proxy and an advance directive are available: which is more likely to reflect the older adult's preferences?. J Med Ethics 2018; 44 (07) 498-503
• 55 Rubin MA, Dhar R, Diringer MN. Racial differences in withdrawal of mechanical ventilation do not alter mortality in neurologically injured patients. J Crit Care 2014; 29 (01) 49-53