Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2018; 09(03): 604-634
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668091
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics

Bahlol Rahimi
1   Department of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
,
Hamed Nadri
1   Department of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2   Student Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
,
Hadi Lotfnezhad Afshar
1   Department of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
,
Toomas Timpka
3   Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
4   Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

05 February 2018

24 June 2018

Publication Date:
15 August 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background One common model utilized to understand clinical staff and patients' technology adoption is the technology acceptance model (TAM).

Objective This article reviews published research on TAM use in health information systems development and implementation with regard to application areas and model extensions after its initial introduction.

Method An electronic literature search supplemented by citation searching was conducted on February 2017 of the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases, yielding a total of 492 references. Upon eliminating duplicates and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 134 articles were retained. These articles were appraised and divided into three categories according to research topic: studies using the original TAM, studies using an extended TAM, and acceptance model comparisons including the TAM.

Results The review identified three main information and communication technology (ICT) application areas for the TAM in health services: telemedicine, electronic health records, and mobile applications. The original TAM was found to have been extended to fit dynamic health service environments by integration of components from theoretical frameworks such as the theory of planned behavior and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, as well as by adding variables in specific contextual settings. These variables frequently reflected the concepts subjective norm and self-efficacy, but also compatibility, experience, training, anxiety, habit, and facilitators were considered.

Conclusion Telemedicine applications were between 1999 and 2017, the ICT application area most frequently studied using the TAM, implying that acceptance of this technology was a major challenge when exploiting ICT to develop health service organizations during this period. A majority of the reviewed articles reported extensions of the original TAM, suggesting that no optimal TAM version for use in health services has been established. Although the review results indicate a continuous progress, there are still areas that can be expanded and improved to increase the predictive performance of the TAM.

Keywords

technology acceptance model - literature review - health information technology - technology acceptance - theoretical models - health informatics

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

Not applicable.


 

  • References

  • 1 Blackwell G, Gordon B. The future of IT in healthcare. Inform Health Soc Care 2008; 33 (04) 211-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Peña-López I. Improving health sector efficiency: the role of information and communication technologies. OECD Health Policy Studies; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Scott RE. e-Records in health--preserving our future. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (5-6): 427-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baker A. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Br Med J 2001; 323 (7322): 1192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cooper JD. Organization, management, implementation and value of EHR implementation in a solo pediatric practice. J Healthc Inf Manag 2004; 18 (03) 51-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rahimi B, Vimarlund V, Timpka T. Health information system implementation: a qualitative meta-analysis. J Med Syst 2009; 33 (05) 359-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hackl WO, Hoerbst A, Ammenwerth E. “Why the hell do we need electronic health records?”. EHR acceptance among physicians in private practice in Austria: a qualitative study. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (01) 53-61
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nadri H, Rahimi B, Timpka T, Sedghi S. The top 100 articles in the medical informatics: a bibliometric analysis. J Med Syst 2017; 41 (10) 150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Anderson JG. Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems. Commun ACM 1997; 40 (08) 83-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jha AK, Ferris TG, Donelan K. , et al. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006; 25 (06) w496-w507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Poon EG, Jha AK, Christino M. , et al. Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 6 (01) 1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lorenzi NM, Novak LL, Weiss JB, Gadd CS, Unertl KM. Crossing the implementation chasm: a proposal for bold action. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15 (03) 290-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rahimi B, Vimarlund V. Methods to evaluate health information systems in healthcare settings: a literature review. J Med Syst 2007; 31 (05) 397-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (08) e1000126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C. , et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011; 8 (01) e1000387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Manage Inf Syst Q 2003; 27: 425-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Coiera E. Guide to Health Informatics. 3rd ed. London: CRC Press; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q 1989; 13: 319-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yousafzai SY, Foxall GR, Pallister JG. Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 1. J Model Manag 2007; 2 (03) 251-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev 2007; 64 (06) 650-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Surendran P. Technology acceptance model: a survey of literature. Int J Business Soc Res 2013; 2 (04) 4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nadri H, Rahimi B, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Samadbeik M, Garavand A. Factors affecting acceptance of hospital information systems based on extended technology acceptance model: a case study in three paraclinical departments. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (02) 238-247
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43 (01) 159-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hale JL, Householder BJ, Greene KL. The theory of reasoned action. In: Dillard JP, Pfau M. , eds. The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice. CA: SAGE Publications; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Legris P, John I, Pierre C. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage 2003; 40 (03) 191-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989; 35 (08) 982-1003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lee Y, Kozar KA, Rt LK. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Comm Assoc Inform Syst 2003; 12 (01) 50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000; 46 (02) 186-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sharp JH. Development, extension, and application: a review of the technology acceptance model. Director 2006; 5: 7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 King WR, Jun H. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage 2006; 43 (06) 740-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Venkatesh V, Hillol B. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 2008; 39 (02) 273-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Turner M, Barbara K, Pearl B, Stuart C, David B. Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 2010; 52 (05) 463-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hsiao CH, Chyan Y. The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: a co-citation analysis. Int J Inf Manage 2011; 31 (02) 128-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hoyt RE, Yoshihashi A, Bailey NJ. Health informatics: practical guide for healthcare and information technology professionals. Informatics Education; 2014: 533
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Turban E, David K, Jae L, Dennis V. Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective 2002. Prentice Hall; 2002. . ISBN 0 13(975285):4
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Gagnon M-P, Desmartis M, Labrecque M. , et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst 2012; 36 (01) 241-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Strudwick G. Predicting nurses' use of healthcare technology using the technology acceptance model: an integrative review. Comput Inform Nurs 2015; 33 (05) 189-198 , quiz E1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ahlan AR, Isma'eel AB. An overview of patient acceptance of health information technology in developing countries: a review and conceptual model. Int J Inform Syst Project Management 2015; 3 (01) 29-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Garavand A, Mohseni M, Asadi H, Etemadi M, Moradi-Joo M, Moosavi A. Factors influencing the adoption of health information technologies: a systematic review. Electron Physician 2016; 8 (08) 2713-2718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Zanaboni P, Lettieri E. Institutionalizing telemedicine applications: the challenge of legitimizing decision-making. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13 (03) e72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P&T 2014; 39 (05) 356-364
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hu PJ, Chau Patrick YK, Sheng Olivia RL, Yan TK. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J Manage Inf Syst 1999; 16 (02) 91-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Han S, Pekka M, Matti S, Markku K. Physicians' acceptance of mobile communication technology: an exploratory study. IJMC 2006; 4 (02) 210-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Hsiao C-H, Tang K-Y. Examining a model of mobile healthcare technology acceptance by the elderly in Taiwan. J Global Inform Tech Manag 2015; 18 (04) 292-311
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Day M, Demiris G, Oliver DP, Courtney K, Hensel B. Exploring underutilization of videophones in hospice settings. Telemed J E Health 2007; 13 (01) 25-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Chau PY, Jen-Hwa HP. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inf Manage 2002; 39 (04) 297-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Kim J, Dellifraine JL, Dansky KH, Mccleary KJ. Physicians' acceptance of telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Int J Inf Syst Change Manag 2010; 4 (03) 210-225
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kim S, Lee KH, Hwang H, Yoo S. Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16 (01) 12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Manimaran S, Lakshmi KB. Development of model for assessing the acceptance level of users in rural healthcare system of Tamil Nadu, India. Technol Health Care 2013; 21 (05) 479-492
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Smith AD, Motley D. Operational and customer relationship management considerations of electronic prescribing among pharmacists. Int J Electron Healthc 2009; 5 (03) 245-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Liang H, Xue Y, Wu X. User acceptance of computerized physician order entry: an empirical investigation. Int J Healthc Inf Syst Inform 2006; 1 (02) 39-50 (IJHISI)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Handayani PW, Hidayanto AN, Pinem AA, Hapsari IC, Sandhyaduhita PI, Budi I. Acceptance model of a Hospital Information System. Int J Med Inform 2017; 99: 11-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 May C, Harrison R, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Mair F, Wallace P. ; Telemedicine Adoption Study Group. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10 (06) 596-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 de Bont A, Bal R. Telemedicine in interdisciplinary work practices: on an IT system that met the criteria for success set out by its sponsors, yet failed to become part of every-day clinical routines. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8 (01) 47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Wager KA, Lee FW, Glaser JP. Health Care Information Systems: A Practical Approach for Health Care Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Chang H. Evaluation framework for telemedicine using the logical framework approach and a fishbone diagram. Healthc Inform Res 2015; 21 (04) 230-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Adam D. The influence of goal-directed and experiential activities on online flow experiences. J Consum Psychol 2003; 13 (01) 3-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychol 2011; 1 (2011): 416-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Gohari M, Noruzi A. The effects of organizational contextual factors on physicians' attitude toward adoption of Electronic Medical Records. J Biomed Inform 2015; 53: 174-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Darker CD, French DP, Longdon S, Morris K, Eves FF. Are beliefs elicited biased by question order? A theory of planned behaviour belief elicitation study about walking in the UK general population. Br J Health Psychol 2007; 12 (Pt 1): 93-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Barker DJ, van Schaik P, Simpson DS, Corbett WA. Evaluating a spoken dialogue system for recording clinical observations during an endoscopic examination. Med Inform Internet Med 2003; 28 (02) 85-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Chang P, Hsu YS, Tzeng YM, Hou IC, Sang YY. Development and pilot evaluation of user acceptance of advanced mass-gathering emergency medical services PDA support systems. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107 (Pt 2): 1421-1425
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Chang P, Hsu YS, Tzeng YM, Sang YY, Hou IC, Kao WF. The development of intelligent, triage-based, mass-gathering emergency medical service PDA support systems. J Nurs Res 2004; 12 (03) 227-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Chen IJ, Yang KF, Tang FI, Huang CH, Yu S. Applying the technology acceptance model to explore public health nurses' intentions towards web-based learning: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45 (06) 869-878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Wilkins MA. Factors influencing acceptance of electronic health records in hospitals. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2009; 6 (05) 1f
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Marini SD, Hasman A, Huijer HA. Information technology for medication administration: assessing bedside readiness among nurses in Lebanon. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 2009; 7 (01) 49-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Van Schaik P, Bettany-Saltikov JA, Warren JG. Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment. Behav Inf Technol 2002; 21 (01) 47-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Huser V, Narus SP, Rocha RA. Evaluation of a flowchart-based EHR query system: a case study of RetroGuide. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43 (01) 41-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Cranen K, Veld RH, Ijzerman M, Vollenbroek-Hutten M. Change of patients' perceptions of telemedicine after brief use. Telemed J E Health 2011; 17 (07) 530-535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Hung M-C, Jen WY. The adoption of mobile health management services: an empirical study. J Med Syst 2012; 36 (03) 1381-1388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Aldosari B. User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in a Saudi Arabian hospital radiology department. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12 (01) 44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Noblin AM, Th WT, Myron F. Intention to use a personal health record: a theoretical analysis using the technology acceptance model. Int J Healthc Technol Manag 2013; 14 (1–2): 73-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Martínez-García A, Moreno-Conde A, Jódar-Sánchez F, Leal S, Parra C. Sharing clinical decisions for multimorbidity case management using social network and open-source tools. J Biomed Inform 2013; 46 (06) 977-984
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Monthuy-Blanc J, Bouchard S, Maïano C, Séguin M. Factors influencing mental health providers' intention to use telepsychotherapy in First Nations communities. Transcult Psychiatry 2013; 50 (02) 323-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Dehnad A, Hosseini AF. Information technology acceptance in health information management. Methods Inf Med 2014; 53 (01) 14-20
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Cilliers L, Stephen F. User acceptance of telemedicine by health care workers: a case of the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Ologeanu-Taddei R, David M, Hugues D. . Bourret R, eds. “Understanding the acceptance factors of an Hospital Information System: evidence from a French University Hospital.” AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; American Medical Informatics Association; 2015
    PubMed
  • 78 Money AG, Atwal A, Young KL, Day Y, Wilson L, Money KG. Using the Technology Acceptance Model to explore community dwelling older adults' perceptions of a 3D interior design application to facilitate pre-discharge home adaptations. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 15 (01) 73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Faruque MO, Holakouie Naieni K, Ardalan A, Ahmadnezhad E, Mohammadinia L. Feasibility assessment of using geoinformatics technology in disaster disease surveillance in a developing country, Iran. PLoS Curr 2015; 7: 7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Kivekäs E, Enlund H, Borycki E, Saranto K. General practitioners' attitudes towards electronic prescribing and the use of the national prescription centre. J Eval Clin Pract 2016; 22 (05) 816-825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Abdullah A, Liew SM, Hanafi NS. , et al. What influences patients' acceptance of a blood pressure telemonitoring service in primary care? A qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016; 10: 99-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Hanauer DA, Wu DTY, Yang L. , et al. Development and empirical user-centered evaluation of semantically-based query recommendation for an electronic health record search engine. J Biomed Inform 2017; 67: 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Rawstorne P, Rohan J, Peter C. , eds. Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior when usage is mandatory. Proceedings of the Twenty First International Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems; 2000
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Handy J, Hunter I, Whiddett R. User acceptance of inter-organizational electronic medical records. Health Informatics J 2001; 7 (02) 103-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Chismar WG, Sonja W-P. , eds. Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. American Medical Informatics Association; 2002
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Liang H, Xue Y, Anthony BT. PDA usage in healthcare professionals: testing an extended technology acceptance model. IJMC 2003; 1 (04) 372-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Liu L, Ma Q. The impact of service level on the acceptance of application service oriented medical records. Inf Manage 2005; 42 (08) 1121-1135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Liu L, Ma Q. Perceived system performance: a test of an extended technology acceptance model. ACM SIGMIS Database 2006; 37 (2–3): 51-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Palm J-M, Isabelle C, Claude S, Patrice D. Determinants of user satisfaction with a clinical information system. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2006:614–618. PubMed PMID: PMC1839744
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Kim D, Chang H. Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: an application of the extended technology acceptance model. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (11-12): 790-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Wu J-H, Wang S-C, Lin L-M. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (01) 66-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Tung F-C, Chang S-C, Chou C-M. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77 (05) 324-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Lai T-Y, Larson EL, Rockoff ML, Bakken S. User acceptance of HIV TIDES—tailored interventions for management of depressive symptoms in persons living with HIV/AIDS. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15 (02) 217-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Wu J-H, Shen W-S, Lin L-M, Greenes RA, Bates DW. Testing the technology acceptance model for evaluating healthcare professionals' intention to use an adverse event reporting system. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20 (02) 123-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Yu P, Li H, Gagnon MP. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (04) 219-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Dasgupta A, Sansgiry SS, Sherer JT, Wallace D, Sikri S. Application of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model in predicting pharmacists' intention to use personal digital assistants. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2009; 49 (06) 792-796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Ilie V, Craig VS, Parikh MA, Courtney JF. Paper versus electronic medical records: the effects of access on physicians' decisions to use complex information technologies. Decis Sci 2009; 40 (02) 213-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Trimmer K, Cellucci LW, Carla W, William W. Electronic medical records: TAM, UTAUT, and culture. Int J Healthc Inf Syst Inform 2009; 4 (03) 55-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Lin S-P, Yang HY. Exploring key factors in the choice of e-health using an asthma care mobile service model. Telemed J E Health 2009; 15 (09) 884-890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (02) 115-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Hyun S, Johnson SB, Stetson PD, Bakken S. Development and evaluation of nursing user interface screens using multiple methods. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (06) 1004-1012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Vishwanath A, Brodsky L, Shaha S. Physician adoption of personal digital assistants (PDA): testing its determinants within a structural equation model. J Health Commun 2009; 14 (01) 77-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Morton ME, Susan W. EHR acceptance factors in ambulatory care: a survey of physician perceptions. EHR Acceptance Factors in Ambulatory Care: A Survey of Physician Perceptions/AHIMA. American Health Information Management Association; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 104 Zhang H, Cocosila M, Archer N. Factors of adoption of mobile information technology by homecare nurses: a technology acceptance model 2 approach. Comput Inform Nurs 2010; 28 (01) 49-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Stocker G. Technology Acceptance of Electronic Medical Records by Nurses. Webster Groves, MO: Webster University; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 106 Lim S, Xue L, Yen CC. , et al. A study on Singaporean women's acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80 (12) e189-e202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Schnall R, Bakken S. Testing the technology acceptance model: HIV case managers' intention to use a continuity of care record with context-specific links. Inform Health Soc Care 2011; 36 (03) 161-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Kowitlawakul Y. The technology acceptance model: predicting nurses' intention to use telemedicine technology (eICU). Comput Inform Nurs 2011; 29 (07) 411-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Egea JMO, González MVR. Explaining physicians' acceptance of EHCR systems: an extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Comput Human Behav 2011; 27 (01) 319-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Hsiao J-L, Chang H-C, Chen RF. A study of factors affecting acceptance of hospital information systems: a nursing perspective. J Nurs Res 2011; 19 (02) 150-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Orruño E, Gagnon MP, Asua J, Ben Abdeljelil A. Evaluation of teledermatology adoption by health-care professionals using a modified Technology Acceptance Model. J Telemed Telecare 2011; 17 (06) 303-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Melas CD, Zampetakis LA, Dimopoulou A, Moustakis V. Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: an extended TAM model. J Biomed Inform 2011; 44 (04) 553-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Pai F-Y, Kai-I H. Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2011; 78 (04) 650-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Jimoh L, Pate MA, Lin L, Schulman KA. A model for the adoption of ICT by health workers in Africa. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81 (11) 773-781
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Lu C-H, Hsiao J-L, Chen RF. Factors determining nurse acceptance of hospital information systems. Comput Inform Nurs 2012; 30 (05) 257-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Lakshmi KB, Rajaram M. Impact of information technology reliance and innovativeness on rural healthcare services: study of Dindigul district in Tamil Nadu, India. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18 (05) 360-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Jian W-S, Syed-Abdul S, Sood SP. , et al. Factors influencing consumer adoption of USB-based Personal Health Records in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12 (01) 277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Escobar-Rodríguez T, Pedro M-L, Mercedes R-AM. Acceptance of e-prescriptions and automated medication-management systems in hospitals: an extension of the technology acceptance model. J Inf Syst 2012; 26 (01) 77-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Ketikidis P, Dimitrovski T, Lazuras L, Bath PA. Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: an application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Informatics J 2012; 18 (02) 124-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Chen R-F, Hsiao J-L. An empirical study of physicians' acceptance of hospital information systems in Taiwan. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18 (02) 120-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Kim J, Park HA. Development of a health information technology acceptance model using consumers' health behavior intention. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14 (05) e133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Parra C, Jódar-Sánchez F, Jiménez-Hernández MD. , et al. Development, implementation, and evaluation of a telemedicine service for the treatment of acute stroke patients: teleStroke. Interact J Med Res 2012; 1 (02) e15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Gagnon MP, Orruño E, Asua J, Abdeljelil AB, Emparanza J. Using a modified technology acceptance model to evaluate healthcare professionals' adoption of a new telemonitoring system. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18 (01) 54-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Wangia V. Testing an extended theoretical framework to explain variance in use of a public health information system. Online J Public Health Inform 2012; 4 (03) ojphi.v4i3.4238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Wong AM, Chang W-H, Ke P-C. , et al. Technology acceptance for an Intelligent Comprehensive Interactive Care (ICIC) system for care of the elderly: a survey-questionnaire study. PLoS One 2012; 7 (08) e40591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Holden RJ, Brown RL, Scanlon MC, Karsh BT. Modeling nurses' acceptance of bar coded medication administration technology at a pediatric hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (06) 1050-1058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Dünnebeil S, Sunyaev A, Blohm I, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H. Determinants of physicians' technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81 (11) 746-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Asua J, Orruño E, Reviriego E, Gagnon MP. Healthcare professional acceptance of telemonitoring for chronic care patients in primary care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12 (01) 139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 129 Kummer TF, Schäfer K, Todorova N. Acceptance of hospital nurses toward sensor-based medication systems: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2013; 50 (04) 508-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 130 Sedlmayr B, Patapovas A, Kirchner M. , et al. Comparative evaluation of different medication safety measures for the emergency department: physicians' usage and acceptance of training, poster, checklist and computerized decision support. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13 (01) 79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Abu-Dalbouh HM. A questionnaire approach based on the technology acceptance model for mobile tracking on patient progress applications. J Comput Sci 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Tavakoli N, Jahanbakhsh M, Shahin A, Mokhtari H, Rafiei M. Electronic medical record in Central Polyclinic of Isfahan oil industry: a case study based on technology acceptance model. Acta Inform Med 2013; 21 (01) 23-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Buenestado D, Elorz J, Pérez-Yarza EG. , et al. Evaluating acceptance and user experience of a guideline-based clinical decision support system execution platform. J Med Syst 2013; 37 (02) 9910
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Escobar-Rodriguez T, Bartual-Sopena L. The roles of users personal characteristics and organisational support in the attitude towards using ERP systems in a Spanish public hospital. Health Inf Manag 2013; 42 (01) 18-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Su S-P, Chung-Hung T, Hsu W-L. Extending the TAM model to explore the factors affecting intention to use telecare systems. JCP 2013; 8 (02) 525-532
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Alali H, Juhana S. Virtual communities of practice: the role of content quality and technical features to increase health care professionals' satisfaction. J Theoretical Appl Inform Tech 2013; 54 (02) 269-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Wang J, Tsai C, Wang S. Using telecare system to construct medication safety mechanisms for remote area elderly. J Chem Pharm Res 2013; 11 (05) 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Chen S-C, Liu SC, Li SH, Yen DC. Understanding the mediating effects of relationship quality on technology acceptance: an empirical study of e-appointment system. J Med Syst 2013; 37 (06) 9981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Sicotte C, Taylor L, Tamblyn R. Predicting the use of electronic prescribing among early adopters in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2013; 59 (07) e312-e321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 140 Liu C-F, Tsai YC, Jang FL. Patients' acceptance towards a web-based personal health record system: an empirical study in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10 (10) 5191-5208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 Ma C-M, Chao C-M, Bor-Wen C. Integrating technology acceptance model and task-technology fit into blended e-learning system. J Appl Sci (Faisalabad) 2013; 13 (05) 736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 142 Escobar-Rodríguez T, Romero-Alonso MM. Modeling nurses' attitude toward using automated unit-based medication storage and distribution systems: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput Inform Nurs 2013; 31 (05) 235-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Huang J-C. Innovative health care delivery system–a questionnaire survey to evaluate the influence of behavioral factors on individuals' acceptance of telecare. Comput Biol Med 2013; 43 (04) 281-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 144 Portela F, Filipe SM, Álvaro S, Fernando R, António A, José M. Adoption of pervasive intelligent information systems in intensive medicine. Proc Tech 2013; 9: 1022-1032
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 145 Johnson MP, Kai Z, Rema P. Modeling the longitudinality of user acceptance of technology with an evidence-adaptive clinical decision support system. Decis Support Syst 2014; 57: 444-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 146 Zhang X, Guo X, Guo F, Lai KH. Nonlinearities in personalization-privacy paradox in mHealth adoption: the mediating role of perceived usefulness and attitude. Technol Health Care 2014; 22 (04) 515-529
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 147 Andrews L, Gajanayake R, Sahama T. The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR). Int J Med Inform 2014; 83 (12) 889-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 148 Gagnon M-P, Ghandour K, Talla PK. , et al. Electronic health record acceptance by physicians: testing an integrated theoretical model. J Biomed Inform 2014; 48: 17-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 149 Hwang JY, Kim KY, Lee KH. Factors that influence the acceptance of telemetry by emergency medical technicians in ambulances: an application of the extended technology acceptance model. Telemed J E Health 2014; 20 (12) 1127-1134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 150 Tsai C-H. The adoption of a Telehealth system: the integration of extended technology acceptance model and health belief model. J Med Imag Health Inform 2014; 4 (03) 448-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 151 Rho MJ, Choi IY, Lee J. Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83 (08) 559-571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 152 Tsai C-H. Integrating social capital theory, social cognitive theory, and the technology acceptance model to explore a behavioral model of telehealth systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11 (05) 4905-4925
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 153 Horan TA, Bengisu T, Brian H, Jacqueline B. , eds. Use of online systems in clinical medical assessments: an analysis of physician acceptance of online disability evaluation systems. 2004 Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE; 2004
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 154 Saigí-Rubió F, Torrent-Sellens J, Jiménez-Zarco A. Drivers of telemedicine use: comparative evidence from samples of Spanish, Colombian and Bolivian physicians. Implement Sci 2014; 9 (01) 128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 155 Steininger K, Barbara S. EHR acceptance among Austrian resident doctors. Health Policy Tech 2015; 4 (02) 121-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 156 Basak E, Gumussoy CA, Calisir F. Examining the factors affecting PDA acceptance among physicians: an extended technology acceptance model. J Healthc Eng 2015; 6 (03) 399-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 157 Al-Adwan AS, Hilary B. Exploring physicians' behavioural intention toward the adoption of electronic health records: an empirical study from Jordan. Int J Healthc Technol Manag 2015; 15 (02) 89-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 158 Kowitlawakul Y, Chan SWC, Pulcini J, Wang W. Factors influencing nursing students' acceptance of electronic health records for nursing education (EHRNE) software program. Nurse Educ Today 2015; 35 (01) 189-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 159 Michel-Verkerke MB, Stegwee RA, Spil Ton AM. The six P's of the next step in electronic patient records in the Netherlands. Health Policy Tech 2015; 4 (02) 137-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 160 Lin H-C. The impact of national cultural differences on nurses' acceptance of hospital information systems. Comput Inform Nurs 2015; 33 (06) 265-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 161 Gartrell K, Trinkoff AM, Storr CL, Wilson ML, Gurses AP. Testing the electronic personal health record acceptance model by nurses for managing their own health: a cross-sectional survey. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (02) 224-247
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 162 Carrera PM, Lambooij MS. Implementation of out-of-office blood pressure monitoring in the Netherlands: from clinical guidelines to patients' adoption of innovation. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94 (43) e1813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 163 Sieverdes JC, Nemeth LS, Magwood GS. , et al. Patient-centered mHealth living donor transplant education program for African Americans: development and analysis. JMIR Res Protoc 2015; 4 (03) e84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 164 Song L, Park B, Oh KM. Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining hospital nurses' behavioral intentions toward the use of bar code medication administration. Comput Inform Nurs 2015; 33 (04) 157-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 165 Jeon E, Park HA. Factors affecting acceptance of smartphone application for management of obesity. Healthc Inform Res 2015; 21 (02) 74-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 166 Alrawabdeh W, Adel S, Fayiz S. Factors affecting the implementation of the national programme for information technology in the national health services: the case of Lorenzo in the North, Midlands and East of England region. Am J Appl Sci 2015; 12 (01) 20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 167 Escobar-Rodríguez T, Lourdes B-S. Impact of cultural factors on attitude toward using ERP systems in public hospitals. Rev Contabilidad 2015; 18 (02) 127-137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 168 Briz-Ponce L, García-Peñalvo FJ. An empirical assessment of a technology acceptance model for apps in medical education. J Med Syst 2015; 39 (11) 176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 169 Lai Y-H, Huang F-F, Yang HH. A study on the attitude of use the mobile clinic registration system in Taiwan. Technol Health Care 2015; 24 (Suppl. 01) S205-S211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 170 Al-Nassar BAY, Khalid Ali R, Sana'a Nawaf A-N. Impact of computerised physician order entry in Jordanian hospitals by using technology acceptance model. Int J Inf Syst Change Manag 2016; 8 (03) 191-210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 171 Lin W-Y, Chou W-C, Tsai TH, Lin CC, Lee MY. Development of a wearable instrumented vest for posture monitoring and system usability verification based on the technology acceptance model. Sensors (Basel) 2016; 16 (12) 2172
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 172 Suresh V, Prabhakar K, Santhanalakshmi K, Maran K. Applying technology acceptance (TAM) model to determine the factors of acceptance in out-patient information system in private hospital sectors in Chennai city. J Pharm Sci Res 2016; 8 (12) 1373-1377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 173 Ifinedo P. The moderating effects of demographic and individual characteristics on nurses' acceptance of information systems: a Canadian study. Int J Med Inform 2016; 87: 27-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 174 Goodarzi H, Khatami SM, Javadzadeh H. , et al. User acceptance of picture archiving and communication system in the emergency department. Iran J Radiol 2016; 13 (02) e20102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 175 Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Dehnad A, Noruzi A, Gohari M. Applying electronic medical records in health care physicians' perspective. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (02) 341-354
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 176 Strudwick G, Booth R, Mistry K. Can social cognitive theories help us understand nurses' use of electronic health records?. Comput Inform Nurs 2016; 34 (04) 169-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 177 Hsiao J-L, Chen RF. Critical factors influencing physicians' intention to use computerized clinical practice guidelines: an integrative model of activity theory and the technology acceptance model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16 (01) 3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 178 Saigi-Rubió F, Jiménez-Zarco A, Torrent-Sellens J. Determinants of the intention to use telemedicine: evidence from primary care physicians. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2016; 32 (1-2): 29-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 179 Lin IC, Lin C, Hsu CL, Roan J, Yeh JS, Cheng YH. The usage behavior and intention stability of nurses: an empirical study of a nursing information system. J Nurs Res 2016; 24 (01) 48-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 180 Ducey AJ, Coovert MD. Predicting tablet computer use: an extended Technology Acceptance Model for physicians. Health Policy Tech 2016; 5 (03) 268-284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 181 Holden RJ, Asan O, Wozniak EM, Flynn KE, Scanlon MC. Nurses' perceptions, acceptance, and use of a novel in-room pediatric ICU technology: testing an expanded technology acceptance model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16 (01) 145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 182 Omar A, Johan E, Synnöve L. , eds. Evaluation of Electronic Prescribing Decision Support System at a Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital: The User Acceptance Perspective. ITCH; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 183 Kuo K-M, Liu CF, Ma CC. An investigation of the effect of nurses' technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13 (01) 88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar