Automating a Manual Sepsis Screening Tool in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Abstract

Objective This article describes the method of integrating a manual pediatric emergency department sepsis screening process into the electronic health record that leverages existing clinical documentation and keeps providers in their current, routine clinical workflows.

Methods Criteria in the manual pediatric emergency department sepsis screening tool were mapped to standard documentation routinely entered in the electronic health record. Data elements were extracted and scored from the medical history, medication record, vital signs, and physical assessments. Scores that met a predefined sepsis risk threshold triggered interruptive system alerts which notified emergency department staff to perform sepsis huddles and consider appropriate interventions. Statistical comparison of the new electronic tool to the manual process was completed by a two-tail paired t-test.

Results The performance of the pediatric electronic sepsis screening tool was evaluated by comparing flowsheet row documentation of the manual, sepsis alert process against the interruptive system alert instance of the electronic sepsis screening tool. In an 8-week testing period, the automated pediatric electronic sepsis screening tool identified 100% of patients flagged by the manual process (n = 29), on average, 68 minutes earlier.

Conclusion Integrating a manual sepsis screening tool into the electronic health record automated identification of pediatric sepsis screening in a busy emergency department. The electronic sepsis screening tool is as accurate as a manual process and would alert bedside clinicians significantly earlier in the emergency department course. Deployment of this electronic tool has the capability to improve timely sepsis detection and management of patients at risk for sepsis without requiring additional documentation by providers.

Keywords

EHR workflow design - emergency medicine - screening tool - pediatric sepsis

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

Human and/or animal subjects were not included in this project.

• References

• 1 Hartman ME, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC, Watson RS. Trends in the epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013; 14 (07) 686-693
• 2 WHO adopts resolution on sepsis. Jena, Germany: Global Sepsis Alliance, May 26, 2017. Available at: https://www.global-sepsis-alliance.org/news/2017/5/26/wha-adopts-resolution-on-sepsis . Accessed October 20, 2018
• 3 Balamuth F, Weiss SL, Neuman MI. , et al. Pediatric severe sepsis in U.S. children's hospitals. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014; 15 (09) 798-805
• 4 Watson RS, Carcillo JA, Linde-Zwirble WT, Clermont G, Lidicker J, Angus DC. The epidemiology of severe sepsis in children in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167 (05) 695-701
• 5 Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, Balamuth F. , et al. Delayed antimicrobial therapy increases mortality and organ dysfunction duration in pediatric sepsis. Crit Care Med 2014; 42 (11) 2409-2417
• 6 Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK. , et al. American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock. Crit Care Med 2017; 45 (06) 1061-1093
• 7 Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S. , et al; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 (19) 1368-1377
• 8 Paul R, Melendez E, Stack A, Capraro A, Monuteaux M, Neuman MI. Improving adherence to PALS septic shock guidelines. Pediatrics 2014; 133 (05) e1358-e1366
• 9 Lane RD, Funai T, Reeder R, Larsen GY. High reliability pediatric septic shock quality improvement initiative and decreasing mortality. Pediatrics 2016; 138 (04) e20154153
• 10 Akcan Arikan A, Williams EA, Graf JM, Kennedy CE, Patel B, Cruz AT. Resuscitation bundle in pediatric shock decreases acute kidney injury and improves outcomes. J Pediatr 2015; 167 (06) 1301-1305
• 11 Cruz AT, Perry AM, Williams EA, Graf JM, Wuestner ER, Patel B. Implementation of goal-directed therapy for children with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (03) e758-e766
• 12 Larsen GY, Mecham N, Greenberg R. An emergency department septic shock protocol and care guideline for children initiated at triage. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (06) e1585-e1592
• 13 Balamuth F, Alpern ER, Abbadessa MK. , et al. Improving recognition of pediatric severe sepsis in the emergency department: contributions of a vital sign–based electronic alert and bedside clinician identification. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 70 (06) 759-768
• 14 The Algorithm Alert Sepsis Collaborative. Available at: http://pedsreadytoolkit.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Triage-Trigger-Tool.pdf . Accessed May 1, 2015
• 15 Balamuth F, Weiss SL, Hall M. , et al. Identifying pediatric severe sepsis and septic shock: accuracy of diagnosis codes. J Pediatr 2015; 167 (06) 1295-300.e4
• 16 Watson RS, Carcillo JA. Scope and epidemiology of pediatric sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005; 6 (3, Suppl): S3-S5
• 17 Keep JW, Messmer AS, Sladden R. , et al. National early warning score at emergency department triage may allow earlier identification of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective observational study. Emerg Med J 2016; 33 (01) 37-41
• 18 Hayden GE, Tuuri RE, Scott R. , et al. Triage sepsis alert and sepsis protocol lower times to fluids and antibiotics in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34 (01) 1-9
• 19 Cruz AT, Williams EA, Graf JM. , et al. Test characteristics of an automated age- and temperature-adjusted tachycardia alert in pediatric septic shock. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28 (09) 889-894
• 20 Sepanski RJ, Godambe SA, Mangum CD, Bovat CS, Zaritsky AL, Shah SH. Designing a pediatric severe sepsis screening tool. Front Pediatr 2014; 2 (56) 56
• 21 Embi PJ, Leonard AC. Evaluating alert fatigue over time to EHR-based clinical trial alerts: findings from a randomized controlled study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (e1): e145-e148