J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80(02): 165-168
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679894
Invited Review
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Systematic Review of Hearing Preservation in Observed Vestibular Schwannoma

Martin Reznitsky
1   Department of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, F2074, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
,
Per Cayé-Thomasen
1   Department of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, F2074, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

19 December 2018

07 January 2019

Publication Date:
01 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective This is a systematic review of the literature on the spontaneous course of hearing in patients observed with a vestibular schwannoma. Included studies are appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

Design PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane library, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched for literature on hearing in patients observed with a vestibular schwannoma.

Participants Of 217 evaluated papers, 15 were included, representing a total of 2,142 patients.

Main Outcome Measures Hearing according to the AAO-HNS (American Academy of Otorhinolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery) classification system. Weighted average of the proportion of patients preserving good hearing (>70% discrimination score and pure tone audiometry [PTA] < 30dB) and serviceable hearing (>50% discrimination score and PTA < 50dB) was determined.

Results Fifty percent of patients presenting with good hearing at diagnosis had preserved this after a mean of 5 years of observation, whereas serviceable hearing was preserved in 54%. Patients with normal discrimination at diagnosis preserve their hearing very well. Very few studies exist on long-term hearing preservation.

Conclusions After 5 years of observation, around half of patients will have preserved good or serviceable hearing. Patients with normal discrimination at diagnosis are more likely to preserve good hearing.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rigby PL, Shah SB, Jackler RK, Chung JH, Cooke DD. Acoustic neuroma surgery: outcome analysis of patient-perceived disability. Am J Otol 1997; 18 (04) 427-435
  • 2 Chiluwal AK, Rothman A, Svrakic M, Dehdashti AR. Surgical outcome in smaller symptomatic vestibular schwannomas. Is there a role for surgery?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (11) 2263-2275
  • 3 Driscoll CL, Jackler RK, Pitts LH, Brackmann DE. Lesions of the internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle in an only hearing ear: is surgery ever advisable?. Am J Otol 2000; 21 (04) 573-581
  • 4 Bozorg Grayeli A, Kalamarides M, Ferrary E. , et al. Conservative management versus surgery for small vestibular schwannomas. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125 (10) 1063-1068
  • 5 Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P, Tos M, Thomsen J. The natural history of vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27 (04) 547-552
  • 6 Solares CA, Panizza B. Vestibular schwannoma: an understanding of growth should influence management decisions. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29 (06) 829-834
  • 7 Breivik CN, Varughese JK, Wentzel-Larsen T, Vassbotn F, Lund-Johansen M. Conservative management of vestibular schwannoma--a prospective cohort study: treatment, symptoms, and quality of life. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (05) 1072-1080 , discussion 1080
  • 8 Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P. Epidemiology and natural history of vestibular schwannomas. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012; 45 (02) 257-268 , vii vii.
  • 9 Stangerup SE, Thomsen J, Tos M, Cayé-Thomasen P. Long-term hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (02) 271-275
  • 10 Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, INC. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113 (03) 179-180
  • 11 Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA. , et al; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328 (7454): 1490
  • 12 Kirchmann M, Karnov K, Hansen S, Dethloff T, Stangerup S-E, Caye-Thomasen P. Ten-year follow-up on tumor growth and hearing in patients observed with an intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurgery 2017; 80 (01) 49-56
  • 13 Tveiten OV, Carlson ML, Goplen F, Vassbotn F, Link MJ, Lund-Johansen M. Long-term auditory symptoms in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma: an international cross-sectional study. Neurosurgery 2015; 77 (02) 218-227 , discussion 227
  • 14 Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P, Tos M, Thomsen J. Change in hearing during ‘wait and scan’ management of patients with vestibular schwannoma. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122 (07) 673-681
  • 15 Caye-Thomasen P, Dethloff T, Hansen S, Stangerup S-E, Thomsen J. Hearing in patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. Audiol Neurotol 2007; 12 (01) 1-12
  • 16 Breivik CN, Nilsen RM, Myrseth E. , et al. Conservative management or gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: tumor growth, symptoms, and quality of life. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (01) 48-56 , discussion 56–57
  • 17 Lin VYW, Stewart C, Grebenyuk J. , et al. Unilateral acoustic neuromas: long-term hearing results in patients managed with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, hearing preservation surgery, and expectantly. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (02) 292-296
  • 18 Godefroy WP, Kaptein AA, Vogel JJ, van der Mey AG. Conservative treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a follow-up study on clinical and quality-of-life outcome. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30 (07) 968-974
  • 19 Quaranta N, Baguley DM, Moffat DA. Change in hearing and tinnitus in conservatively managed vestibular schwannomas. Skull Base 2007; 17 (04) 223-228
  • 20 Ferri GG, Modugno GC, Pirodda A, Fioravanti A, Calbucci F, Ceroni AR. Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas: an effective strategy. Laryngoscope 2008; 118 (06) 951-957
  • 21 Roehm PC, Gantz BJ. Management of acoustic neuromas in patients 65 years or older. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28 (05) 708-714
  • 22 Pennings RJ, Morris DP, Clarke L, Allen S, Walling S, Bance ML. Natural history of hearing deterioration in intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (01) 68-77
  • 23 Régis J, Carron R, Park MC. , et al. Wait-and-see strategy compared with proactive Gamma Knife surgery in patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2010; 113 (Suppl): 105-111
  • 24 Lee JD, Park MK, Kim JS, Cho YS. The factors associated with tumor stability observed with conservative management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35 (05) 918-921
  • 25 Remenyi J, Marshall A, Enticott JC, Briggs RJ. The prognostic value of speech recognition scores at diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16 (11) 1460-1463
  • 26 Fayad JN, Semaan MT, Lin J, Berliner KI, Brackmann DE. Conservative management of vestibular schwannoma: expectations based on the length of the observation period. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35 (07) 1258-1265
  • 27 Roche P-H, Soumare O, Thomassin J-M, Régis J. The wait and see strategy for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. Prog Neurol Surg 2008; 21: 83-88
  • 28 Reddy CE, Lewis-Jones HG, Javadpour M, Ryland I, Lesser TH. Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas of 15 to 31 mm intracranial diameter. J Laryngol Otol 2014; 128 (09) 752-758