Robotics in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Maria Bautista; Jorge Manrique; William J. Hozack

doi:10.1055/s-0039-1681053

The Journal of Knee Surgery, Table of Contents

J Knee Surg 2019; 32(07): 600-606
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681053

Special Focus Section

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Robotics in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Maria Bautista

¹Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, School of Medicine, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia

,

Jorge Manrique

²Rothman Institute, Department of Orthopedic surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

³Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

,

William J. Hozack

²Rothman Institute, Department of Orthopedic surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful operation that improves patients' quality of life and functionality. Yet, up to 20% of TKA patients remain unsatisfied with their clinical result. Robotic TKA has gained increased attention and popularity as a means of improving patient satisfaction. The promise of robotic-assisted TKA is that it provides a surgeon with a tool that accurately executes bone cuts according to presurgical planning, as well as provides the surgeon with intraoperative feedback helpful for restoring knee kinematics and soft tissue balance. Several systems are now available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Evidence that the use of robotics will lead to improved implant survival, function, and patient-reported outcomes is slowly being accumulated, but this has not been clearly proven to date. Recent literature does show that the use of robotics during TKA is not associated with increased surgical time or complications. The goal of this review is to provide an objective assessment of the evidence surrounding robotic technology for TKA.

Keywords

arthroplasty - replacement - knee - robotic surgery - surgical - instruments - patient-reported outcomes

Full Text

References

References
1 Day CP. Robotics in industry—their role in intelligent manufacturing. Engineering 2018; 4 (04) 440-445
2 Lang JE, Mannava S, Floyd AJ. , et al. Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (10) 1296-1299
3 Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2000; 214 (01) 129-140
4 Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2353-2363
5 Dal Moro F. How robotic surgery is changing our understanding of anatomy. Arab J Urol 2017; 16 (03) 297-301
6 Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH. Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18 (04) 816-830
7 Moustris GP, Hiridis SC, Deliparaschos KM, Konstantinidis KM. Evolution of autonomous and semi-autonomous robotic surgical systems: a review of the literature. Int J Med Robot 2011; 7 (04) 375-392
8 Parsley BS. Robotics in orthopedics: a brave new world. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (08) 2355-2357
9 Liow MH, Xia Z, Wong MK, Tay KJ, Yeo SJ, Chin PL. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (12) 2373-2377
10 van der List JP, Chawla H, Joskowicz L, Pearle AD. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (11) 3482-3495
11 Liow MHL, Goh GS, Wong MK, Chin PL, Tay DK, Yeo SJ. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (09) 2942-2951
12 Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (07) 1069-1076
13 Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Iatrogenic bone and soft tissue trauma in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study and validation of a new classification system. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (08) 2496-2501
14 Lonner JH, Fillingham YA. Pros and cons: a balanced view of robotics in knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (07) 2007-2013
15 Urish KL, Conditt M, Roche M, Rubash HE. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: surgical assistant for a customized normal kinematic knee. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (05) e822-e827
16 Yang HY, Seon JK, Shin YJ, Lim HA, Song EK. Robotic total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate-retaining implant: a 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Surg 2017; 9 (02) 169-176
17 Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp EL. , et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated soft tissue protection. Surg Technol Int 2017; 30: 441-446
18 Sultan AA, Piuzzi N, Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Sodhi N, Mont MA. Utilization of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty for soft tissue protection. Expert Rev Med Devices 2017; 14 (12) 925-927
19 Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky DJ, Mont MA. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated improved accuracy and precision compared to manual technique. J Knee Surg. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641729
20 Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Sultan AA, Chughtai M, Molloy RM, Mont MA. Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (07) 2002-2006
21 Stryker. Mako Total Knee Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery. MAKTKA-WC-2_15232. Available at: https://www.stryker.com/us/en/joint-replacement/systems/mako-total-knee.html . Accessed August 15, 2018
22 National Joint Registry for England Wales Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. National Joint Registry. 12th Annual Report. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/default.aspx . Published 2015
23 Marchand R, Khlopas A, Sodhi N. , et al. Difficult cases in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a case series. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 27-37
24 Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B (07) 930-937
25 NAVIO Surgical System. Smith & Nephew. Available at: http://smithnephewlivesurgery.com/navio-surgical-system . Published 2017. Accessed August 17, 2018
26 Bargar WL, Bauer A, Börner M. Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (354) 82-91
27 Liow MH, Chin PL, Pang HN, Tay DK-J, Yeo S-J. THINK surgical TSolution-One^® (Robodoc) total knee arthroplasty. SICOT J 2017; 3: 63
28 Robodoc. Robodoc (R). Available at: http://www.biomedhealthtech.com/robodoc.html . Accessed August 17, 2018
29 Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, Netravali NA, Bargar WL. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 118-126
30 Liow MH, Chin PL, Tay KJ, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Early experiences with robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the DigiMatch™ ROBODOC® surgical system. Singapore Med J 2014; 55 (10) 529-534
31 Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 111-116
32 Omni. iBlock/NanoBlock - OMNIBotics Total Knee Replacment™. Available at: http://www.omnils.com/healthcare-professionals/OMNIBotic_software.cfm . Accessed August 27, 2018
33 Plaskos C, Cinquin P, Lavallée S, Hodgson AJ. Praxiteles: a miniature bone-mounted robot for minimal access total knee arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot 2005; 1 (04) 67-79
34 Ponder C, Plaskos C, Cheal E. Press-fit total knee arthroplasty with a robotic-cutting guide: proof of concept and initial experience. Orthop Proc 2013; 95–B (Suppl. 28) 61
35 Suero EM, Plaskos C, Dixon PL, Pearle AD. Adjustable cutting blocks improve alignment and surgical time in computer-assisted total knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (09) 1736-1741
36 Koulalis D, O'Loughlin PF, Plaskos C, Kendoff D, Cross MB, Pearle AD. Sequential versus automated cutting guides in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2011; 18 (06) 436-442
37 Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ. The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 2005; 38 (02) 349-355
38 Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (6, Suppl): 39-43
39 Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73 (05) 709-714
40 Sikorski JM. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (09) 1121-1127
41 Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, Roth E, Nafe B, Eckardt A. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (05) 573-579
42 Koenig JA, Suero EM, Plaskos C. Surgical accuracy and efficiency of computer-navigated TKA with a robotic cutting guide – report on the first 100 cases. Orthop Proc 2012; 94–B (SUPP XLIV): 103
43 Shan L, Shan B, Suzuki A, Nouh F, Saxena A. Intermediate and long-term quality of life after total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (02) 156-168
44 Bonner TJ, Eardley WG, Patterson P, Gregg PJ. The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (09) 1217-1222
45 Allen MM, Pagnano MW. Neutral mechanical alignment: Is it Necessary?. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (1, suppl A): 81-83
46 Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Robertsson O. I can't get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (11, suppl A): 148-152
47 Marchand R, Sodhi N, Khlopas A. , et al. Patient satisfaction outcomes after robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a short-term evaluation. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (09) 849-853
48 Griffin FM, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (08) 970-973
49 Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 2002; 9 (03) 173-180
50 Park SE, Lee CT. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (07) 1054-1059
51 Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Khlopas A. , et al. Coronal correction for severe deformity using robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 2-5
52 Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MGE, Richart T. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2006; 2 (01) 70-72
53 Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Schweizer ML, Callaghan JJ. The incidence of and risk factors for 30-day surgical site infections following primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (9, Suppl): 47-50
54 Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (07) 1710-1715
55 Sculco TP. The economic impact of infected total joint arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 1993; 42: 349-351
56 Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J. , et al. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (Suppl. 03) 144-151
57 Coon TM. Integrating robotic technology into the operating room. Am J Orthop 2009; 38 (2, Suppl): 7-9
58 Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Piuzzi NS. , et al. Erratum to: the learning curve associated with robotic total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (04) 370
59 Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. 2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: does computer navigation in knee arthroplasty improve functional outcomes in young patients? A randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (01) 6-15
60 Wysocki RW, Sheinkop MB, Virkus WW, Della Valle CJ. Femoral fracture through a previous pin site after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (03) 462-465
61 Gulhane S, Holloway I, Bartlett M. A vascular complication in computer navigated total knee arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 2013; 47 (01) 98-100
62 Brown MJ, Matthews JR, Bayers-Thering MT, Phillips MJ, Krackow KA. Low incidence of postoperative complications with navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (07) 2120-2126
63 Kim KI, Kim DK, Juh HS, Khurana S, Rhyu KH. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2016; 22 (03) 446-452
64 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (04) 780-785
65 Swank ML, Alkire M, Conditt M, Lonner JH. Technology and cost-effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: computer navigation and robotics. Am J Orthop 2009; 38 (2, Suppl): 32-36
66 Moschetti WE, Konopka JF, Rubash HE, Genuario JW. Can robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty be cost-effective? A Markov decision analysis. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (04) 759-765