Early and Midterm Outcomes of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement—Reimplantation Technique

Abstract

Background Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an increasingly popular alternative to traditional aortic root replacement for aortic root aneurysm disease with a normal aortic valve. We evaluated the early and midterm outcomes of VSARR—reimplantation technique (VSARR-RT) done at a single institution over a decade.

Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent VSARR-RT between January 2004 and July 2014.

Results A total of 85 patients underwent VSARR-RT. Median time to latest echocardiographic follow-up was 4 years (range: 15–72 months). Total observation time was 491 patient years. Mean age was 44.6 ± 14.3 years, and 13 (15%) were women. Thirty-nine (46%) patients had a connective tissue disorder and 6 (7%) had a bicuspid aortic valve. Thirty-three (39%) patients underwent concomitant procedures, including coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 9, 11%), mitral valve repair (n = 8, 9%), and aortic hemi-arch replacement (n = 7, 8%). There were no operative deaths or in-house mortality and no postoperative strokes. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated survival of 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97–100%) at 2 years and 98% (95% CI: 97–100%) at 8 years. Freedom from reoperation was 95.8% (95% CI: 91.2–100%) at 8 years. Freedom from endocarditis was 100% at 8 years. At the last echocardiographic follow-up, 95% of patients were free of severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and 82% free of moderate AR. Of the four patients who had severe AR, three underwent reoperations and received prosthetic valves and one is being clinically monitored.

Conclusion This study reports early and midterm outcomes after VSARR-RT at our institution, including those patients who underwent a VSARR-RT procedure combined with other procedures. Further follow-up remains necessary to determine long-term outcomes.

Keywords

valve-sparing aortic root replacement - David procedure - reimplantation technique

• References

• 1 Tamura K, Arai H, Kawaguchi S. , et al. Long-term results of modified Bentall procedure using flanged composite aortic prosthesis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 19 (02) 126-130
• 2 Stephens EH, Liang DH, Kvitting JP. , et al. Incidence and progression of mild aortic regurgitation after Tirone David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147 (01) 169-177 , 178.e1–178.e3
• 3 David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103 (04) 617-621 , discussion 622
• 4 Kvitting JP, Kari FA, Fischbein MP. , et al. David valve-sparing aortic root replacement: equivalent mid-term outcome for different valve types with or without connective tissue disorder. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145 (01) 117-126 , 127.e1–127.e5, discussion 126–127
• 5 Svensson LG, Blackstone EH, Cosgrove III DM. Surgical options in young adults with aortic valve disease. Curr Probl Cardiol 2003; 28 (07) 417-480
• 6 Svensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, Coselli JS, Safi HJ. Composite valve graft replacement of the proximal aorta: comparison of techniques in 348 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54 (03) 427-437 , discussion 438–439
• 7 Miller DC. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with the Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125 (04) 773-778
• 8 Kallenbach K, Pethig K, Schwarz M, Milz A, Haverich A, Harringer W. Valve sparing aortic root reconstruction versus composite replacement—perioperative course and early complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20 (01) 77-81
• 9 De Paulis R, De Matteis GM, Nardi P. , et al. One-year appraisal of a new aortic root conduit with sinuses of Valsalva. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123 (01) 33-39
• 10 Svensson LG, Deglurkar I, Ung J. , et al. Aortic valve repair and root preservation by remodeling, reimplantation, and tailoring: technical aspects and early outcome. J Card Surg 2007; 22 (06) 473-479
• 11 Karck M, Kallenbach K, Hagl C, Rhein C, Leyh R, Haverich A. Aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome: comparison of aortic valve-sparing reimplantation versus composite grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127 (02) 391-398
• 12 Volguina IV, Miller DC, LeMaire SA. , et al; Aortic Valve Operative Outcomes in Marfan Patients study group. Valve-sparing and valve-replacing techniques for aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome: analysis of early outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137 (05) 1124-1132
• 13 Kallenbach K, Baraki H, Khaladj N. , et al. Aortic valve-sparing operation in Marfan syndrome: what do we know after a decade?. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83 (2, Suppl): S764-S768 , discussion S785–S790
• 14 Leyh RG, Fischer S, Kallenbach K. , et al. High failure rate after valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the “remodeling technique” in acute type A aortic dissection. Circulation 2002; 106 (12) (Suppl. 01) I229-I233
• 15 De Paepe A, Devereux RB, Dietz HC, Hennekam RC, Pyeritz RE. Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1996; 62 (04) 417-426
• 16 Svensson LG, Blackstone EH, Alsalihi M. , et al. Midterm results of David reimplantation in patients with connective tissue disorder. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95 (02) 555-562
• 17 David TE, Armstrong S, Maganti M, Colman J, Bradley TJ. Long-term results of aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138 (04) 859-864 , discussion 863–864
• 18 Coselli JS, Hughes MS, Green SY. , et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: early and midterm outcomes in 83 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97 (04) 1267-1273 , discussion 1273–1274
• 19 De Paulis R, Scaffa R, Nardella S. , et al. Use of the Valsalva graft and long-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140 (6, Suppl): S23-S27 , discussion S45–S51