J Knee Surg 2020; 33(06): 597-602
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683889
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Extended Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics with First-Generation Cephalosporin Do Not Reduce the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Feng-Chih Kuo
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
,
Po-Chun Lin
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
,
Kerri L. Bell
2   The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Jih-Yang Ko
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
,
Ching-Jen Wang
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
,
Jun-Wen Wang
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 March 2018

05 February 2019

Publication Date:
06 May 2019 (online)

Abstract

Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics administered within 24 hours of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been documented to prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, the effectiveness of this regimen is still unclear in aseptic revision TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether extended postoperative prophylactic antibiotics would reduce the PJI rate compared with the current 24-hour standard postoperative prophylactic antibiotics after aseptic revision TKA. A retrospective review of 236 patients (46 men, 190 women, 252 knees) who underwent aseptic revision TKA between 2005 and 2013 was conducted. Patients who underwent septic revision, had a positive intraoperative culture, or who had less than 2 years of follow-up were excluded. Patients were divided according to the duration of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics to standard group (76 knees, ≤ 24 hours) or extended group (176 knees, > 24 hours). PJI was determined by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed. The mean follow-up was 5.2 ± 2.5 years. Patients with extended postoperative prophylactic antibiotics had a lower PJI rate (1.1%) compared with standard group (3.9%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.14). Body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 was the only independent risk factor of PJI (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 9.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–86.04, p = 0.043). The use of extended postoperative prophylactic antibiotics was not a risk factor for PJI (adjusted HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.06–2.04, p = 0.238). After 10 years, the two groups had similar infection-free implant survival rate (95.9 vs. 98.9%, p = 0.15). Our findings demonstrate that extended postoperative prophylactic antibiotics did not reduce PJI rate compared with the standard group in aseptic revision TKA. A further prospective, randomized study with a standardized postoperative antibiotic protocol is necessary to address this topic. Level of evidence is prognostic Level III.

 
  • References

  • 1 Nodzo SR, Boyle KK, Spiro S, Nocon AA, Miller AO, Westrich GH. Success rates, characteristics, and costs of articulating antibiotic spacers for total knee periprosthetic joint infection. Knee 2017; 24 (05) 1175-1181
  • 2 Suarez J, Griffin W, Springer B, Fehring T, Mason JB, Odum S. Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail?. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (6, suppl 1): 99-103
  • 3 Mortazavi SM, Schwartzenberger J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (08) 2052-2059
  • 4 Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM. , et al; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP); Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA); Surgical Infection Society (SIS); Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013; 14 (01) 73-156
  • 5 WHO Global guidelines on the prevention of surgical site infection. Available at: http://www.who.int/gpsc/ssi-guidelines/en/ . Accessed May 29, 2018
  • 6 Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery. Treat Guidel Med Lett 2012; 10 (122) 73-78 , quiz 79–80
  • 7 Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the international consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (11) 1450-1452
  • 8 Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI. , et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014; 35 (Suppl 2): S66-S88
  • 9 Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW. , et al; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (08) 784-791
  • 10 de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Rotstein C, Weening B, Royston K, Winemaker M. Antibiotic prophylaxis for total joint replacement surgery: results of a survey of Canadian orthopedic surgeons. Can J Surg 2009; 52 (06) E229-E234
  • 11 Claret G, Tornero E, Martínez-Pastor JC. , et al. A prolonged post-operative antibiotic regimen reduced the rate of prosthetic joint infection after aseptic revision knee arthroplasty. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2015; 16 (06) 775-780
  • 12 Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CH. , et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2014; 63 (05) 713-735
  • 13 Blanc B, Finch CA, Hallberg L, Herbert V, Lawkowicz W, Layrisse M. Nutritional anaemias. Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1968; 405: 5-37
  • 14 Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 1999; 48: 167-175
  • 15 Parvizi J, Gehrke T. ; International Consensus Group on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (07) 1331
  • 16 AlBuhairan B, Hind D, Hutchinson A. Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (07) 915-919
  • 17 Hickson CJ, Metcalfe D, Elgohari S. , et al. Prophylactic antibiotics in elective hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of organisms reported to cause infections and national survey of clinical practice. Bone Joint Res 2015; 4 (11) 181-189
  • 18 Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR. Prosthetic joint infection diagnosed postoperatively by intraoperative culture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 439 (439) 38-42
  • 19 Barrack RL, Aggarwal A, Burnett RS. , et al. The fate of the unexpected positive intraoperative cultures after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (6, suppl 2): 94-99
  • 20 Saleh A, Guirguis A, Klika AK, Johnson L, Higuera CA, Barsoum WK. Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in aseptic revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (11) 2181-2186
  • 21 Jacobs AME, Bénard M, Meis JF, van Hellemondt G, Goosen JHM. The unsuspected prosthetic joint infection: incidence and consequences of positive intra-operative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B (11) 1482-1489
  • 22 Jiranek WA, Hanssen AD, Greenwald AS. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement for infection prophylaxis in total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (11) 2487-2500
  • 23 Chiu FY, Lin CF. Antibiotic-impregnated cement in revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective cohort study of one hundred and eighty-three knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (03) 628-633
  • 24 Bini SA, Chan PH, Inacio MC, Paxton EW, Khatod M. Antibiotic cement was associated with half the risk of re-revision in 1,154 aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2016; 87 (01) 55-59
  • 25 Wang JW, Hsu CH, Huang CC, Lin PC, Chen WS. Reconstruction using femoral head allograft in revision total knee replacement: an experience in Asian patients. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (05) 643-648
  • 26 Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (12) 2640-2647
  • 27 Watts CD, Wagner ER, Houdek MT, Lewallen DG, Mabry TM. Morbid obesity: increased risk of failure after aseptic revision TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (08) 2621-2627