Preoperative Evaluation of the Effects of Sigmoid Sinus Ligation with both Endovascular and Open-Field Occlusion Tests before Removal of Petroclival Tumors
27 December 2018
25 February 2019
26 March 2019 (online)
Background Surgery for petroclival tumors is very challenging for neurosurgeons because the position of the tumor in relation to the brainstem, cranial nerves, and posterior fossa vessels greatly restricts the surgical field. Some papers have described using sigmoid sinus ligation to open the surgical field; however, pre- and intraoperative evaluations of the safety of ligation have been limited, despite the risk of complications from venous insufficiency. Here, we describe our method of preoperatively evaluating the potential safety of a retrolabyrinthine transsigmoid approach with nondominant ipsilateral sigmoid sinus ligation (RLTSwSSL).
Methods A retrospective review was conducted on petroclival tumors treated over a 5-year period with RLTSwSSL after evaluation with both an endovascular balloon occlusion test (BOT) and an open-field sinus clipping occlusion test (COT). Changes in pressure of < 10 mm Hg and the absence of neurodegeneration during the tests indicated that it would be safe to proceed with permanent ligation.
Results Four patients with large petroclival tumors underwent surgery via RLTSwSSL after detailed preoperative evaluations with both BOT and COT. All patients had uneventful courses of recovery without developing any complications derived from venous insufficiency.
Conclusion In our case series, we have described a protocol for using both BOT and COT to evaluate the likely outcomes after sigmoid sinus ligation and thereby to improve safety. Further studies are needed to establish definite criteria for both occlusion tests that will ensure good outcomes.
Author S.S. conceived and designed the study, analyzed the data, and drafted and revised the manuscript. Authors S.S., T.I., T.T., H.H., and T.F. contributed to obtaining the data. All the authors critically reviewed and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.
All patients and their families gave the necessary consent for this report to be published.
- 1 Inamasu J, Shiobara R, Kawase T, Kanzaki J. Haemorrhagic venous infarction following the posterior petrosal approach for acoustic neurinoma surgery: a report of two cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 259 (03) 162-165
- 2 Koerbel A, Gharabaghi A, Safavi-Abbasi S. , et al. Venous complications following petrosal vein sectioning in surgery of petrous apex meningiomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35 (07) 773-779
- 3 Ryu H, Yamamoto S, Sugiyama K, Yokota N, Tanaka T. Neurovascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in elderly patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1999; 39 (03) 226-229 , discussion 229–230
- 4 Tsukamoto H, Matsushima T, Fujiwara S, Fukui M. Peduncular hallucinosis following microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: case report. Surg Neurol 1993; 40 (01) 31-34
- 5 Roberson Jr. JB, Brackmann DE, Fayad JN. Complications of venous insufficiency after neurotologic-skull base surgery. Am J Otol 2000; 21 (05) 701-705
- 6 Zanoletti E, Cazzador D, Faccioli C, Martini A, Mazzoni A. Closure of the sigmoid sinus in lateral skull base surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2014; 34 (03) 184-188
- 7 Samii M, Tatagiba M. Experience with 36 surgical cases of petroclival meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992; 118 (1,2): 27-32
- 8 Hwang SK, Gwak HS, Paek SH, Kim DG, Jung HW. Guidelines for the ligation of the sigmoid or transverse sinus during large petroclival meningioma surgery. Skull Base 2004; 14 (01) 21-28 , discussion 29
- 9 Spetzler RF, Daspit CP, Pappas CT. The combined supra- and infratentorial approach for lesions of the petrous and clival regions: experience with 46 cases. J Neurosurg 1992; 76 (04) 588-599
- 10 Day JD, Fukushima T, Giannotta SL. Cranial base approaches to posterior circulation aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1997; 87 (04) 544-554
- 11 Ernemann U, Löwenheim H, Freudenstein D, Koerbel A, Heininger A, Tatagiba M. Hemodynamic evaluation during balloon test occlusion of the sigmoid sinus: clinical and technical considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26 (01) 179-182