Estimation of the Humerus Length by its Proximal Segments: A South Indian Anatomical Study

Abstract

Introduction To determine the morphometric data of the proximal segments of the humerus in the South Indian population, and to obtain the regression equations that will enable us to predict the whole length of humerus.

Materials and Methods The present study included 166 dried adult human humeri. Their lengths were measured by using the osteometric board. The seven proximal segment lengths of the humeri were assessed by using a digital Vernier caliper (Mitutoyo Corporation 150 mm/6 inch, model number 500-196-20, Kawasaki, Japan).

Results The mean humerus length in the present study was 30.75 ± 2.03 cm on the right side and 30.27 ± 2.28 cm on the left side. The comparison between the right and left sides of the proximal segments of the humerus did not yield statistically significant results (p > 0.05). The present study observed that the relationship between the dimensions of the proximal segments of the humerus and the length of humerus were strong (p = 0.00). The oblique length between the most proximal and distal points over the anatomical neck was the best parameter to predict the length of humerus (the Pearson coefficient was 0.78 for the right side and 0.77 for the left side).

Conclusion The simple regression formulae, which were derived in this study, are helpful in the estimation of the length of the humerus. The formulae can be used in forensic investigations, in which the stature of a person has to be determined and only bone fragments are available. The morphometric data of the present study have implications in archaeological and anthropological studies. The data are enlightening to orthopedicians, when planning reconstructive surgeries of the proximal end of the humerus in the South Indian population.

Keywords

archeology - forensic medicine - humerus

Note

Mangala M. Pai is presently working as Professor and Head of the Anatomy Department and is interested in the field of human morphology. She has more than 50 research articles published on human morphology and anthropology.

Sources of Support

None.

• References

• 1 Hoppa RD, Gruspier KL. Estimating diaphyseal length from fragmentary subadult skeletal remains: implications for palaeodemographic reconstructions of a southern Ontario ossuary. Am J Phys Anthropol 1996; 100 (03) 341-354
• 2 Raxter MH, Auerbach BM, Ruff CB. Revision of the Fully technique for estimating statures. Am J Phys Anthropol 2006; 130 (03) 374-384
• 3 Pearson OM. Activity, climate, and postcranial robusticity: implications for modern human origins and scenarios of adaptive change. Curr Anthropol 2000; 41 (04) 569-607
• 4 Ruff CB. Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans. J Hum Evol 2000; 38 (02) 269-290
• 5 Krishan K. Anthropometry in forensic medicine and forensic science - ‘forensic anthropometry’. The Internet Journal of Forensic Science 2006; 2: 1
• 6 Steele DG. Estimation of stature from fragments of long limb bones. In: Stewart TD. , ed. Personal Identification in Mass Disaster. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1970: 85-97
• 7 Salles AD, Carvalho CRF, Silva DM, Santana LA. Reconstruction of humeral length from measurements of its proximal and distal fragments. Braz J Morphol Sci 2009; 26: 55-61
• 8 Işcan MY. Global forensic anthropology in the 21st century. Forensic Sci Int 2001; 117 (1-2): 1-6
• 9 Iscan MY. Forensic anthropology of sex and body size. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 147: 107-112
• 10 Beddoe J. On the stature of the older races of England, as estimated from the long bones. J Anthropol Inst G B Irel 1888; 17: 201-209
• 11 Nath S, Badkur P. Reconstruction of stature from long bone lengths. Anthropologist 2002; 4: 109-114
• 12 Petersen HC. On the accuracy of estimating living stature from skeletal length in the grave and by linear regression. Int J Osteoarchaeol 2005; 15: 106-114
• 13 Willey P, Falsetti T. Inaccuracy of height information on driver's licenses. J Forensic Sci 1991; 36 (03) 813-819
• 14 Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, Bannister LH. The humerus. In: Gray's Anatomy. 37th ed,. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1989: 406
• 15 Singhal S, Rao V. Estimation of total length of humerus from its segments. Med Sci Law 2011; 51 (01) 18-20
• 16 Somesh MS, Prabhu LV, Pai MM, Shilpa K, Krishnamurthy A, Murlimanju BV. Morphometric study of the humerus in Indian population. Int J Morphol 2011; 29: 1174-1180
• 17 Wright LE, Vásquez MA. Estimating the length of incomplete long bones: forensic standards from Guatemala. Am J Phys Anthropol 2003; 120 (03) 233-251
• 18 Muñoz JI, Liñares-Iglesias M, Suárez-Peñaranda JM. , et al. Stature estimation from radiographically determined long bone length in a Spanish population sample. J Forensic Sci 2001; 46 (02) 363-366
• 19 Zverev Y, Chisi J. Estimating height from arm span measurement in Malawian children. Coll Antropol 2005; 29 (02) 469-473
• 20 Ross AH, Konigsberg LW. New formulae for estimating stature in the Balkans. J Forensic Sci 2002; 47 (01) 165-167
• 21 Murlimanju BV, Prabhu LV, Pai MM. , et al. Anthropometric study of the bicipital groove in Indians and its clinical implications. Chang Gung Med J 2012; 35 (02) 155-159
• 22 Robertson DD, Yuan J, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Yamaguchi K. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82-A (11) 1594-1602