Prosthetic Rehabilitation in the Lower Limb

Abstract

Lower limb amputations form a considerable number with 5,436,000 Indians having locomotor disability. Most members of this group are young, active earning males. The major cause of amputation is trauma. Hence, this population must be rehabilitated with priority, and best concerted efforts must be made by the medical community. In this article, the authors present available modern technologies in India and share best practices from their experience of treating Indian amputees for the past 20 years. The objective is to demonstrate to the medical community the optimal outcomes that can be achieved and help them make correct decisions on behalf of patients and their families. The article discusses history of prostheses, how to select optimal amputation level, preamputation preparation, determinants of good outcomes, preprosthetic preparation, components of prosthesis, their function and significance, rehabilitation process and guidelines, prescription criteria, and also special considerations such as multiple amputees or children.

Keywords

lower limb amputations - prosthetics - leg prosthetics - considerations before amputations

• References

• 1 Census. 2011 http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/population_enumeration.html
• 2 Pooja DG, Sangeeta L. Prevalence and aetiology of amputation in Kolkata, India: a retrospective analysis. Hong Kong Physiother J 2013; 31 (01) 36-40
• 3 Miller C, Finn A, Delzell E. Battlefield injuries: Saving lives and limbs throughout history. Lower Extremity Review Magazine. October 2013
• 4 Childress DS. Historical aspects of powered limb prostheses. Clin Prosthet Orthot 1985; 9 (01) 2-13
• 5 Fairley M. Microprocessor-controlled knees: evolution of a game changer. The O&P EDGE. June 1 2014
• 6 Cronk MT. New knee helps amputees return to front lines. DoD News. January 10 2012
• 7 Shanmuganathan R. The utility of scores in the decision to salvage or amputation in severely injured limbs. Indian J Orthop 2008; 42 (04) 368-376
• 8 Arwert HJ, van Doorn-Loogman MH, Koning J, Terburg M, Rol M, Roebroeck ME. Residual-limb quality and functional mobility 1 year after transtibial amputation caused by vascular insufficiency. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44 (05) 717-722
• 9 Smith DG. the knee disarticulation: it's better when it's better and it's not when it's not. In Motion. 2004 14. 1
• 10 Pinzur MS, Gold J, Schwartz D, Gross N. Energy demands for walking in dysvascular amputees as related to the level of amputation. Orthopedics 1992; 15 (09) 1033-1036 discussion 1036–1037
• 11 Hagberg E, Berlin OK, Renström P. Function after throughknee compared with below-knee and above-knee amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992; 16 (03) 168-173
• 12 Chakrabarty BK. An audit of the quality of the stump and its relation to rehabilitation in lower limb amputees. Disablement Services Centre, Harold Wood Hospital; UK:
• 13 Andrews LK, Bellmann M, Burger H. et al. ISPO Report—Lower Limb Amputations due to Vascular Disease: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Surgery and Rehabilitation.
• 14 Fairley M. Microprocessor-controlled knees: evolution of a game changer. The O&P Edge. June 2014
• 15 Kaluf B, Smith C. Advantages and/or disadvantages of microprocessor controlled prosthetic feet and ankles. Congress Lecture [6802]. 2018