CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2019; 52(01): 117-124
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688521
Review Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Review of Cross-Leg Flaps in Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Lower Extremity Wounds in a Microsurgical Unit

Ravi K. Mahajan
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amandeep Hospital and Clinics, Amritsar, Punjab, India
,
Krishnan Srinivasan
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amandeep Hospital and Clinics, Amritsar, Punjab, India
,
Harish Ghildiyal
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kailash Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
,
Mahipal Singh
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amandeep Hospital and Clinics, Amritsar, Punjab, India
,
Adish Jain
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amandeep Hospital and Clinics, Amritsar, Punjab, India
,
Taha Kapadia
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amandeep Hospital and Clinics, Amritsar, Punjab, India
,
Ankush Tambotra
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amandeep Hospital and Clinics, Amritsar, Punjab, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 May 2019 (online)

Abstract

Since the advent of microsurgery, and expanding expertise in the field, extensive traumatic wounds of leg have been managed successfully with free tissue transfer. Various patient-related factors may preclude the use of free flaps even in units with available expertise and infrastructure. It is in such situations that the “cross-leg flap” comes into play. In these cases, instead of attempting complicated anastomotic techniques or anastomosis in the zone of trauma, it is better to perform the simpler and more reliable cross-leg flap. In this study, we try to show the utility of a cross-leg flap based on a retrospective study of 198 patients who underwent cross-leg flap in our institute over a period of 15 years extending from November 2003 to March 2018. Materials and methods: Case sheets of all patients who underwent cross-leg flap from November 2003 to March 2018 were reviewed. The location of defect in the leg, the indication for cross-leg flap, the pattern of cross-leg flap, and perioperative complications were noted. Results: A total of 198 patients underwent cross-leg flap for traumatic soft tissue injury of leg during this period. The most common reason for performing cross-leg flap was poor pulsatility of the recipient artery as seen intraoperatively, followed by the economics of the procedure wherein the initial cost of free flap was found significantly higher compared with cross-leg flap. All flaps survived with partial necrosis occurring in 23 patients. All flaps settled well by 2 years’ time. Bony union/fracture healing evaluation was not a part of this study. Conclusion: Cross-leg flap is still a useful tool for leg wound coverage even in microsurgical unit in situations precluding free flap coverage.

 
  • References

  • 1 Sharma RK, Kola G. Cross leg posterior tibial artery fasciocutaneous island flap for reconstruction of lower leg defects. Br J Plast Surg 1992; 45 (01) 62-65
  • 2 Georgescu AV, Irina C, Ileana M. Cross-leg tibial posterior perforator flap. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (05) 379-383
  • 3 Basile A, Stopponi M, Loreti A, Minniti de Simeonibus AU. Heel coverage using a distally based sural artery fasciocutaneous cross-leg flap: report of a small series. J Foot Ankle Surg 2008; 47 (02) 112-117
  • 4 Yildirim S, Akan M, Giderodğlu K, Aköz T. Use of distally based saphenous neurofasciocutaneous and musculofasciocutaneous cross-leg flaps in limb salvage. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47 (05) 568-574
  • 5 Kohli JS, Pande S, Bajaj SP. Large transverse fasciocutaneous leg flap: whole leg flap. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53 (06) 495-498
  • 6 Wang ZQ, Cao YL, Huang YF, Liu DQ, Li XF. Cross-leg repair of large soft-tissue defects in distal sites of the feet by distally based neuro-fasciocutaneous flaps with perforating vessels. Genet Mol Res 2014; 13 (03) 5484-5491
  • 7 Francel TJ, Vander Kolk CA, Hoopes JE, Manson PN, Yaremchuk MJ. Microvascular soft-tissue transplantation for reconstruction of acute open tibial fractures: timing of coverage and long-term functional results. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (03) 478-487 discussion 488–489
  • 8 Khouri RK, Shaw WW. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: a 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1989; 29 (08) 1086-1094
  • 9 Heller L, Levin LS. Lower extremity microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (04) 1029-1041 quiz 1042
  • 10 Percival NJ, Sykes PJ, Earley MJ. Free flap surgery: the Welsh Regional Unit experience. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42 (04) 435-440
  • 11 Lu L, Liu A, Zhu L, Zhang J, Zhu X, Jiang H. Cross-leg flaps: our preferred alternative to free flaps in the treatment of complex traumatic lower extremity wounds. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217 (03) 461-471
  • 12 Qing L, Wu P, Liang J, Yu F, Wang C, Tang J. Use of flow-through anterolateral thigh perforator flaps in reconstruction of complex extremity defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (08) 571-578
  • 13 Koul AR, Patil RK, Nahar S. Unfavourable results in free tissue transfer. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46 (02) 247-255
  • 14 Koul AR, Patil RK, Philip VK. Early use of microvascular free tissue transfer in the management of electrical injuries. Burns 2008; 34 (05) 681-687
  • 15 Park S, Han SH, Lee TJ. Algorithm for recipient vessel selection in free tissue transfer to the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (07) 1937-1948
  • 16 Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H. et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (06) 363-368 discussion 369
  • 17 Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR. et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 711-721
  • 18 Nahabedian MY, Singh N, Deune EG, Silverman R, Tufaro AP. Recipient vessel analysis for microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52 (02) 148-155 discussion 156–157
  • 19 Colen LB, Stevenson A, Sidorov V. et al. Microvascular anastomotic thrombosis in experimental diabetes mellitus. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (01) 156-162
  • 20 Gu YD, Zhang GM, Zhang LY, Li FG, Jiang JF. Clinical and experimental studies of cigarette smoking in microvascular tissue transfers. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (06) 391-397
  • 21 Kim SW, Youn S, Kim JD, Kim JT, Hwang KT, Kim YH. Reconstruction of extensive lower limb defects with thoracodorsal axis chimeric flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (02) 470-479
  • 22 Mahajan RK, Srinivasan K, Bhamre A, Singh M, Kumar P, Tambotra A. A retrospective analysis of latissimus dorsi-serratus anterior chimeric flap reconstruction in 47 patients with extensive lower extremity trauma. Indian J Plast Surg 2018; 51 (01) 24-32
  • 23 Koul AR, Nahar S, Prabhu J, Kale SM, Kumar PH. Free boomerang-shaped extended rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: the longest possible skin/myocutaneous free flap for soft tissue reconstruction of extremities. Indian J Plast Surg 2011; 44 (03) 396-404
  • 24 Kapadia A, Cheruvu VR, John JR, Tripathy S, Sharma RK. Reconstruction in pediatric orthopedic trauma: the role of primary cross leg flap cover. J Pediatr Orthop B 2017; 26 (02) 172-178
  • 25 Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY, Disa JJ, Pusic A, Mehrara BJ. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (07) 2092-2100
  • 26 Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake F, Li L, Schmelzle R, Heiland M. Outcome and complications of 540 microvascular free flaps: the Hamburg experience. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11 (01) 89-92
  • 27 Cho EH, Shammas RL, Carney MJ. et al. Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity traumatic reconstruction: a multicenter outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 191-199
  • 28 Hong JP, Shin HW, Kim JJ, Wei FC, Chung YK. The use of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps in chronic osteomyelitis of the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (01) 142-147
  • 29 Reisler T, Buziashvili D, Liu FC, Datiashvili RO. Revisiting the fasciocutaneous perforator cross-leg flap. Eplasty 2016; 16: ic16
  • 30 Long CD, Granick MS, Solomon MP. The cross-leg flap revisited. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 30 (06) 560-563
  • 31 Perez Macias JM. Reconstruction of the foot and lower leg by a fasciocutaneous cross-leg flap after traumatic amputation and circumferential soft-tissue loss. Chir Plast. 1986; 8: 187-191
  • 32 Sharma RK, Mehrotra S, Nanda V. The perforator “plus” flap: a simple nomenclature for locoregional perforator-based flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (06) 1838-1839
  • 33 Ingianni G, Mfihlbauer W. The musculo-cutaneous cross leg flap. Chir Plastica (Berl) 1979; 4: 289-292
  • 34 Kamath BJ, Varghese T, Bhardwaj P. Tips and techniques: a modified cross leg flap for large triangular defects of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle J 2008; 1 (08) 5
  • 35 Morris AM, Buchan AC. The place of the cross-leg flap in reconstructive surgery of the lower leg and foot: a review of 165 cases. Br J Plast Surg 1978; 31 (02) 138-142