(Y)ears of Freedom? Customized Splints in Microtia Reconstruction to Maintain Cephloauricular Angle

Abstract

Background Maintaining ear projection and preservation of cephaloauricular sulcus from obliteration following graft contracture is a challenge following staged microtia reconstruction. Authors have designed simple, effective, and easy-to-use splints to ensure improved aesthetic outcomes and patient compliance.

Materials and Methods This is a prospective study over 3 years including 8 patients of both sexes aged 6 to 12 years. Custom-made ear splints were designed separately for females and males and used to maintain ear projection. Projection of the ear was measured postoperatively and at follow-up using goniometer and photographic records. Outcome was assessed in terms of cephaloauricular angle, conchal depth, pain, cost-effectiveness, splint retention period, and aesthetics.

Results and Conclusion Maximal follow-up was 2 years. The splint effectively maintained ear projection of more than 30 degrees. Patient compliance was optimal, and no major complications were associated with its prolonged use.

Keywords

cephaloauricular sulcus - ear projection - microtia - customized splints

• References

• 1 Bhandari PS, Singh S. Dental impression compound as an effective splint for maintenance of ear elevation in microtia reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46 (03) 518-520
• 2 Krishnan CJ, Balaji SM, Jain AR. A simple ear splint for microtia patients. Indian J Dent Res 2015; 26 (02) 220-221
• 3 Karanth SK, Mokal NJ. Silicone Foley's catheter: a useful splint in ear surgeries. Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41 (01) 51-54
• 4 Puri V, Kare N, Venkateshwaran N. A simple method of applying ear dressing in microtia patients. Indian J Otol 2012; 18: 154-155
• 5 Balaji SM. Two stage ear/microtia reconstruction using costal cartilage. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2015; 5 (02) 163-167
• 6 Yotsuyanagi T, Yokoi K, Urushidate S, Sawada Y. A supportive technique using a splint to obtain definite contour and desirable protrusion after reconstruction of microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (04) 1051-1055
• 7 Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: part IV. Ear elevation for the constructed auricle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (02) 254-266
• 8 Zhang Q, Quan Y, Su Y, Shi L, Xie Y, Liu X. Expanded retroauricular skin and fascial flap in congenital microtia reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64 (04) 428-434
• 9 Ou LF, Yan RS, Tang YW. Firm elevation of the auricle in reconstruction of microtia with a retroauricular fascial flap wrapping an autogenous cartilage wedge. Br J Plast Surg 2001; 54 (07) 573-580
• 10 Prantl L, Ashary I, Eisenmann-Klein M, Schwarze H. Modification of the second stage of auricular elevation in Nagata's technique for treating microtia. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2007; 41 (03) 109-113
• 11 Vercruysse H, Green Jr. JI, Osman G, Harrison B, Miyagi K, Bulstrode NW. Splinting after ear reconstruction: a stepwise and inexpensive workflow protocol. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (04) 356-358
• 12 Yamamoto N. et al. 2-Octyl-cyanoacrylate skin adhesive used as a splinting material in auricular surgery. Modern Plastic Surgery 2016; 6: 21-26