CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2019; 54(04): 422-427
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694019
Artigo Original | Original Article
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

A versão femoral está associada a alterações na força dos músculos do quadril em mulheres com impacto femoroacetabular sintomático?[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
Adriano David Marostica
1   Clínica Reab, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, SC, Brasil
,
2   Laboratório de Engenharia Biomecânica (LEBm), Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, SC, Brasil
,
Guilherme Pradi Adam
3   Imagem Clínica, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, SC, Brasil
,
Daniel Codonho
4   Imperial Hospital de Caridade, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, SC, Brasil
,
Richard Prazeres Canella
4   Imperial Hospital de Caridade, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, SC, Brasil
,
Gerson Gandhi Ganev
5   Centro de Pesquisas Oncológicas (Cepon), Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 July 2018

12 March 2019

Publication Date:
20 August 2019 (online)

Resumo

Objetivo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a associação da anteversão femoral e da força dos músculos do quadril em indivíduos com síndrome do impacto femoroacetabular.

Método Os ângulos de versão femoral descritos nas imagens de ressonância magnética articular e os testes isocinéticos foram avaliados retrospectivamente entre julho de 2016 e dezembro de 2017. Os critérios de inclusão foram: a) versão femoral avaliada pelo mesmo radiologista; b) ângulo α ≥ 55°; e c) ausência de dor limitante durante o teste isocinético. Os picos de torque em flexão/extensão, abdução/adução e rotação interna/externa foram avaliados a 30°/s em 5 repetições. A correlação entre a versão femoral e a força muscular foi avaliada por meio de regressão linear simples, com nível de significância estatística de 5%.

Resultados Um total de 37 mulheres atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Foram avaliados 51 quadris sintomáticos. Não houve correlação da anteversão femoral nos picos de torque em flexão, extensão, abdução, adução, rotação externa e rotação interna.

Conclusão A anteversão femoral não foi correlacionada à força dos músculos do quadril em mulheres com impacto femoroacetabular sintomático.

* Trabalho feito na Clínica Reab, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.


 
  • Referências

  • 1 Chegini S, Beck M, Ferguson SJ. The effects of impingement and dysplasia on stress distributions in the hip joint during sitting and walking: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Res 2009; 27 (02) 195-201
  • 2 Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (07) 1012-1018
  • 3 Botser IB, Ozoude GC, Martin DE, Siddiqi AJ, Kuppuswami S, Domb BG. Femoral anteversion in the hip: comparison of measurement by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (05) 619-627
  • 4 Jackson TJ, Lindner D, El-Bitar YF, Domb BG. Effect of femoral anteversion on clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (01) 35-41
  • 5 Satpathy J, Kannan A, Owen JR, Wayne JS, Hull JR, Jiranek WA. Hip contact stress and femoral neck retroversion: a biomechanical study to evaluate implication of femoroacetabular impingement. J Hip Preserv Surg 2015; 2 (03) 287-294
  • 6 Baldon RdeM, Nakagawa TH, Muniz TB, Amorim CF, Maciel CD, Serrão FV. Eccentric hip muscle function in females with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Athl Train 2009; 44 (05) 490-496
  • 7 Ireland ML, Willson JD, Ballantyne BT, Davis IM. Hip strength in females with and without patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2003; 33 (11) 671-676
  • 8 Bolgla LA, Malone TR, Umberger BR, Uhl TL. Hip strength and hip and knee kinematics during stair descent in females with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008; 38 (01) 12-18
  • 9 Casartelli NC, Maffiuletti NA, Item-Glatthorn JF. , et al. Hip muscle weakness in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19 (07) 816-821
  • 10 Diamond LE, Wrigley TV, Hinman RS. , et al. Isometric and isokinetic hip strength and agonist/antagonist ratios in symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. J Sci Med Sport 2016; 19 (09) 696-701
  • 11 Nepple JJ, Goljan P, Briggs KK, Garvey SE, Ryan M, Philippon MJ. Hip Strength Deficits in Patients With Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (11) 2106-2111
  • 12 Casartelli NC, Maffiuletti NA, Item-Glatthorn JF, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Hip muscle strength recovery after hip arthroscopy in a series of patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Hip Int 2014; 24 (04) 387-393
  • 13 Schutte LM, Hayden SW, Gage JR. Lengths of hamstrings and psoas muscles during crouch gait: effects of femoral anteversion. J Orthop Res 1997; 15 (04) 615-621
  • 14 Barrientos C, Barahona M, Diaz J, Brañes J, Chaparro F, Hinzpeter J. Is there a pathological alpha angle for hip impingement? A diagnostic test study. J Hip Preserv Surg 2016; 3 (03) 223-228
  • 15 de Sa D, Urquhart N, Philippon M, Ye JE, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR. Alpha angle correction in femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (04) 812-821
  • 16 Beck M, Sledge JB, Gautier E, Dora CF, Ganz R. The anatomy and function of the gluteus minimus muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (03) 358-363
  • 17 Delp SL, Hess WE, Hungerford DS, Jones LC. Variation of rotation moment arms with hip flexion. J Biomech 1999; 32 (05) 493-501
  • 18 Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the hip: a focus on muscular actions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40 (02) 82-94
  • 19 Cibulka MT, Strube MJ, Meier D. , et al. Symmetrical and asymmetrical hip rotation and its relationship to hip rotator muscle strength. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010; 25 (01) 56-62
  • 20 Philippon MJ, Ejnisman L, Pennock AT. , et al. Does Femoral Anteversion Play a Role in the Pathomechanics and Subsequent Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement? (SS-44). Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2011; 27 (05) e53
  • 21 Nyland J, Kuzemchek S, Parks M, Caborn DNM. Femoral anteversion influences vastus medialis and gluteus medius EMG amplitude: composite hip abductor EMG amplitude ratios during isometric combined hip abduction-external rotation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004; 14 (02) 255-261
  • 22 Delp SL, Komattu AV, Wixson RL. Superior displacement of the hip in total joint replacement: effects of prosthetic neck length, neck-stem angle, and anteversion angle on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. J Orthop Res 1994; 12 (06) 860-870
  • 23 Souza RB, Powers CM. Predictors of hip internal rotation during running: an evaluation of hip strength and femoral structure in women with and without patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (03) 579-587
  • 24 Powers CM. The influence of abnormal hip mechanics on knee injury: a biomechanical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40 (02) 42-51
  • 25 Baldon RdeM, Lobato D FM, Carvalho LP, Wun P YL, Presotti CV, Serrão FV. Relationships between eccentric hip isokinetic torque and functional performance. J Sport Rehabil 2012; 21 (01) 26-33
  • 26 Ferro FP, Ho CP, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Patient-centered outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears are not different in patients with normal, high, or low femoral version. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (03) 454-459