J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81(06): 694-700
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694053
Original Article

Delayed Instrumentation Following Removal of Cranio-Vertebral Junction Chordomas: A Technical Note

Pierre-Olivier Champagne
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
,
Eduard H. Voormolen
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
,
Hamid Mammar
2   Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie- Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO), Orsay, France
,
Anne-Laure Bernat
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
,
Walid Krichen
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
,
Nicolas Penet
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
,
Sébastien Froelich
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisiere Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective To investigate on the feasibility and safety of a new approach which consists of delaying instrumentation after destabilizing craniovertebral junction (CVJ) chordoma surgery, allowing proton beam radiotherapy to be performed in a metal-free tumoral cavity.

Design This is a retrospective series of a prospectively maintained database.

Participants Five consecutive patients operated on for a CVJ chordomas for which instrumentation after tumor resection was deferred to after radiotherapy treatment.

Main Outcome Measures The main outcome consisted of measurements of the following parameters: C0–C2 angle, atlanto-dens interval (ADI), condylar gap, and the position of the dens relative to McGregor's line and coronal inclination, performed at 3 different times for all patients: before tumor surgery (baseline), before instrumentation surgery, and after instrumentation surgery.

Results For all patients, CVJ parameters deteriorated during the delay period, but stayed within normal limits for most. Because of radiological instability, one patient necessitated instrumentation before receiving radiotherapy. All parameters except condylar gap were partially corrected after instrumentation. No new neurological symptom or evolving neck pain occurred during the delay period.

Conclusion Delayed instrumentation of CVJ chordomas can be a safe alternative that might lead to improved subsequent radiotherapeutical treatment. Patient's selection and close clinical and radiological follow-up are mandatory for the success of this approach.



Publication History

Received: 07 March 2019

Accepted: 11 June 2019

Article published online:
04 September 2019

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Menezes AH. Clival and craniovertebral junction chordomas. World Neurosurg 2014; 81 (5-6): 690-692
  • 2 al-Mefty O, Borba LA. Skull base chordomas: a management challenge. J Neurosurg 1997; 86 (02) 182-189
  • 3 Mendenhall WM, Mendenhall CM, Lewis SB, Villaret DB, Mendenhall NP. Skull base chordoma. Head Neck 2005; 27 (02) 159-165
  • 4 Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. et al. Clival chordomas: A pathological, surgical, and radiotherapeutic review. Head Neck 2014; 36 (06) 892-906
  • 5 Stacchiotti S, Sommer J. Chordoma Global Consensus Group. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (02) e71-e83
  • 6 Shin H, Barrenechea IJ, Lesser J, Sen C, Perin NI. Occipitocervical fusion after resection of craniovertebral junction tumors. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 4 (02) 137-144
  • 7 Tedesco G, Gasbarrini A, Bandiera S, Ghermandi R, Boriani S. Composite PEEK/Carbon fiber implants can increase the effectiveness of radiotherapy in the management of spine tumors. J Spine Surg 2017; 3 (03) 323-329
  • 8 Zimel MN, Hwang S, Riedel ER, Healey JH. Carbon fiber intramedullary nails reduce artifact in postoperative advanced imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44 (09) 1317-1325
  • 9 Zoccali C, Soriani A, Rossi B, Salducca N, Biagini R. The Carbofix™ “Piccolo Proximal femur nail”: A new perspective for treating proximal femur lesion. A technique report. J Orthop 2016; 13 (04) 343-346
  • 10 Cardoso AC, Fontes RB, Tan LA, Rhoton Jr AL, Roh SW, Fessler RG. Biomechanical effects of the transcondylar approach on the craniovertebral junction. Clin Anat 2015; 28 (05) 683-689
  • 11 Núñez-Pereira S, Hitzl W, Bullmann V, Meier O, Koller H. Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: an analysis of occipitocervical and spinopelvic interdependence, with C-7 slope as a marker of cervical and spinopelvic alignment. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 23 (01) 16-23
  • 12 Kuntz IV C, Shaffrey CI, Ondra SL. et al. Spinal deformity: a new classification derived from neutral upright spinal alignment measurements in asymptomatic juvenile, adolescent, adult, and geriatric individuals. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (3, Suppl): 25-39
  • 13 McGREGER M. The significance of certain measurements of the skull in the diagnosis of basilar impression. Br J Radiol 1948; 21 (244): 171-181
  • 14 Cronin CG, Lohan DG, Mhuircheartigh JN, Meehan CP, Murphy J, Roche C. CT evaluation of Chamberlain's, McGregor's, and McRae's skull-base lines. Clin Radiol 2009; 64 (01) 64-69
  • 15 Hinck VC, Hopkins CE. Measurement of the atlanto-dental interval in the adult. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1960; 84: 945-951
  • 16 Rojas CA, Bertozzi JC, Martinez CR, Whitlow J. Reassessment of the craniocervical junction: normal values on CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28 (09) 1819-1823
  • 17 Chandra PS, Goyal N, Chauhan A, Ansari A, Sharma BS, Garg A. The severity of basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation correlates with sagittal joint inclination, coronal joint inclination, and craniocervical tilt: a description of new indexes for the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery 2014; 10 (Suppl 4): 621-629, discussion 629–630
  • 18 Cobb J. The American academy of orthopedic surgeons instructional course lectures. Vol. 5. Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards; 1948
  • 19 Fourney DR, Frangou EM, Ryken TC. et al. Spinal instability neoplastic score: an analysis of reliability and validity from the spine oncology study group. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (22) 3072-3077
  • 20 Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC. et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine 2010; 35 (22) E1221-E1229
  • 21 Diebo BG, Challier V, Henry JK. et al. Predicting cervical alignment required to maintain horizontal gaze based on global spinal alignment. Spine 2016; 41 (23) 1795-1800
  • 22 Le Huec JC, Demezon H, Aunoble S. Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (01) 63-71
  • 23 Nevelsky A, Borzov E, Daniel S, Bar-Deroma R. Perturbation effects of the carbon fiber-PEEK screws on radiotherapy dose distribution. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18 (02) 62-68
  • 24 Ringel F, Ryang YM, Kirschke JS. et al. Radiolucent carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screws for treatment of spinal tumors: advantages for radiation planning and follow-up imaging. World Neurosurg 2017; 105: 294-301