Morphological Differences between the First and Second Permanent Upper Molars

Abstract

The dental elements present similar and specific anatomical features, depending on the functions they have in the oral cavity. The permanent molars are the most complex structures, mainly the occlusal face, due to their function of food grinding. The aim of the present article is to present the upper first and second molars morphology, emphasizing the similarities and differences between them. Besides, the upper first and second molars of the collection of the Department of Morphology of Universidade Estadual de Paulista (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, were evaluated regarding the presence of the oblique ridge, frequency and classification of the molar tubercle, and the crown morphology (upper second molars). In the 372 evaluated upper first molars, the molar tubercle was absent in most of the teeth. When present, the molar tubercle belonged to the mesiolingual cusp; 8.9% were classified as type I; 9.1% as type II; and 9.4% as type III. The oblique ridge was present in all upper first molars. The morphology of 401 upper second molars was also evaluated; 64.83% were tetracuspid; 35.16% tricuspid; and 17.02% presented compression morphology. In 100 tricuspid teeth, 50% presented oblique ridge, with it being prominent in 30%. No upper second molars presented molar tubercle. Although there are similarities between the upper first and second molars, we must always be aware of the features that differ between them, so their functionality can be restored.

Keywords

anatomy and anthropology - education in morphology - macroscopic human anatomy

• References

• 1 Picosse M. Anatomia Dentária. 4 ed. São Paulo: Sarvier; 1977: 294
• 2 Alvares S. Fundamentos de Endodontia com Técnica Endodôntica. 2 ed. São Paulo: Quintenssence; 1995: 343
• 3 Silva RG, Pécora JD. Anatomia dental: Dentes Permanentes. 1 ed. São Paulo: Santos; 1998: 76
• 4 Della Serra O. Anatomia Dental. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro. Científica (Jaboticabal) 1959; ;•••: 330
• 5 Madeira MC, Rizzolo RJC. Anatomia do Dente. 8 ed. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2016: 169
• 6 Costa C, Costa ACB, Savedra CMS. Fundamentos da Anatomia para o Estudante de Odontologia. 1 ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2000: 338
• 7 Sousa EMD, Carvalho LFPC, Pereira LL. Prevalência do tubérculo de Carabelli no primeiro molar superior. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Fed Bahia 2000; 20: 6-10
• 8 Della Serra O, Ferreira FV. Anatomia dental. 3 ed. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 1981: 334
• 9 Woelfel JB, Scheid RC. Anatomia Dental, sua Relevância para a Odontologia, 5 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2000: 330
• 10 Vieira GF. Atlas de Anatomia de Dentes Permanentes: Coroa Dental. 3 ed. São Paulo: Santos; 2018: 144
• 11 Meredith HV, Hixon EH. Frequency, size, and bilateralism of Carabelli's tubercle. J Dent Res 1954; 33 (03) 435-440
• 12 Sicher H. Anatomia Oral. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Atheneu; 1955: 555
• 13 Garza MTR. Anatomía Dental. 3 ed. México: Manual Moderno; 2009: 170
• 14 Vier-Pelisser FV, Só MVR, Broilo L, Oliveira LS, Pelisser A. Influência do Tubérculo de Carabelli na topografia do teto da câmara pulpar de primeiros molares superiores. Rev. ABO nac. 2007; 15 (04) 277-280
• 15 Ferreira MA, Hespanhol LC, Capote TSO, Gonçalves MA, Campos DB, Campos JADB. Presence and morphology of the molar tubercle according to dentition, hemi-arch and sex. Int J Morphol 2010; 28 (01) 121-125
• 16 Figún ME, Garino RR. Anatomia odontológica funcional e aplicada. 2 ed. Porto Alegre. Art Med 2003; ;•••: 532
• 17 Pagano JL, Carbó RAR, Ramón A. . 1 ed. Anatomía dentaria. Buenos Aires: Mundi; 1965: 664
• 18 Sicher H, Tandler J. Anatomia para Dentistas. 3 ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 1981: 416
• 19 Sicher H, Dubrul E. Anatomia Oral. 8 ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1991: 390