CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2019; 13(04): 540-546
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697110
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

A Study of Dentists about Their Knowledge and Practice of Dentine Hypersensitivity

Faisal Izhar
1   Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, FMH College of Medicine & Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Muhammad Ashraf Nazir
2   Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Abdul Majeed
3   Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
,
Khalid Almas
2   Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
16. Oktober 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and practice about dentine hypersensitivity (DH) among dental practitioners.

Materials and Methods A pilot-tested questionnaire was sent to practicing dentists (n = 588) working in private and public sectors in Lahore, Pakistan. The questions assessed dentists’ knowledge about type of pain and predisposing factors of DH. The dentists were asked about their preferred methods of diagnosing and managing the condition.

Statistical Analysis Basic statistics, chi-squared test, and multivariate logistic regression were performed.

Results Most dentists (64.3%) reported examining one to five patients with DH per week in their dental clinics. A large majority (85.4%) indicated DH as a stimulated short pain from a tooth. Recession of gums (96.6%), aggressive brushing (88.2%), and frequent use of teeth whitening procedures (83.1%) were most frequently reported predisposing factors of DH. Among most commonly used methods of diagnosis, spontaneous pain after the application of air blast was reported by 74.8% of the participants and followed by spontaneous patient report confirmed by dental examination (57.7%). Most widely used management approaches of DH included the use of fluoride products (96.2%), use of desensitizing potassium nitrate toothpastes (75%), and application of bonding agents (56.2%). Female versus male dentists (odds ratio [OR]: 7.79, p < 0.001) and private practitioners versus public dentists (OR: 7.34, p < 0.001) were more likely to examine greater number of patients with DH.

Conclusion Dentists used various methods for diagnosing and managing patients with DH. Application of air blast to evaluate spontaneous pain and use of fluoride products were most widely used diagnostic and management preferences, respectively.

 
  • References

  • 1 Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity. Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69 (04) 221-226
  • 2 Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Meyerowitz C, Litaker MS. et al. National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity by National Dental Practice-Based Research Network practitioners: results from a questionnaire administered prior to initiation of a clinical study on this topic. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17 (01) 41
  • 3 Bekes K, John MT, Schaller HG, Hirsch C. Oral health-related quality of life in patients seeking care for dentin hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 2009; 36 (01) 45-51
  • 4 Boiko OV, Baker SR, Gibson BJ. et al. Construction and validation of the quality of life measure for dentine hypersensitivity (DHEQ). J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37 (11) 973-980
  • 5 West NX, Sanz M, Lussi A, Bartlett D, Bouchard P, Bourgeois D. Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity and study of associated factors: a European population-based cross-sectional study. J Dent 2013; 41 (10) 841-851
  • 6 Addy M. Tooth brushing, tooth wear and dentine hypersensitivity--are they associated?. Int Dent J 2005; 55 (04) Suppl 1 261-267
  • 7 Costa RS, Rios FS, Moura MS, Jardim JJ, Maltz M, Haas AN. Prevalence and risk indicators of dentin hypersensitivity in adult and elderly populations from Porto Alegre, Brazil. J Periodontol 2014; 85 (09) 1247-1258
  • 8 Que K, Ruan J, Fan X, Liang X, Hu D. A multi-centre and cross-sectional study of dentin hypersensitivity in China. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37 (07) 631-637
  • 9 Ye W, Feng XP, Li R. The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in Chinese adults. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39 (03) 182-187
  • 10 Haneet RK, Vandana LK. Prevalence of dentinal hypersensitivity and study of associated factors: a cross-sectional study based on the general dental population of Davangere, Karnataka, India. Int Dent J 2016; 66 (01) 49-57
  • 11 Bamise CT, Olusile AO, Oginni AO, Dosumu OO. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity among adult patients attending a Nigerian teaching hospital. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007; 5 (01) 49-53
  • 12 Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Eijkman MA, Newman HN. Dentists’ perceptions of dentine hypersensitivity and knowledge of its treatment. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29 (03) 219-225
  • 13 Amarasena N, Spencer J, Ou Y, Brennan D. Dentine hypersensitivity - Australian dentists’ perspective. Aust Dent J 2010; 55 (02) 181-187
  • 14 Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Meyerowitz C, Litaker MS. et al. National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Management of dentine hypersensitivity by practitioners in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2017; 148 (10) 728-736
  • 15 Afolabi AO, Ogundipe OK, Adegbulugbe IC, Shaba OP. Perception of dentine hypersensitivity and its management by a group of Nigerian dentists. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2012; 22 (03) 216-220
  • 16 Oderinu OH, Sede MA, Oginni AO. et al. Knowledge, diagnosis and management of dentine hypersensitivity: a national survey of dentists in Nigeria. Int Dent J 2017; 67 (05) 287-293
  • 17 Sullivan KM. Documentation for Sample Size for a Proportion. Available at: https://www.openepi.com/PDFDocs/SSCohortDoc.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2017
  • 18 Stojsin I, Petrović L, Stojanac I, Drobac M. Multi-factoriality of dentine hypersensitivity [Article in Serbian]. Med Pregl 2008; 61 (07) (08) 359-363
  • 19 Pereira R, Gillam D, Bapatla S, Satyamurthy P. Awareness of dentine hypersensitivity among general dental practitioners in Mumbai, India. J Odontol 2018; 2: 103
  • 20 Cunha-Cruz J, Wataha JC, Zhou L. et al. Treating dentin hypersensitivity: therapeutic choices made by dentists of the northwest PRECEDENT network. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141 (09) 1097-1105
  • 21 Benoist FL, Ndiaye FG, Faye B, Bane K, Ngom PI, Ndong PM. Knowledge of and management attitude regarding dentine hypersensitivity among dentists from a West African country. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15 (01) 86-91
  • 22 Clark D, Levin L. Tooth hypersensitivity treatment trends among dental professionals. Quintessence Int 2018; 49 (02) 147-151
  • 23 Heft MW, Litaker MS, Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT. et al. National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Patient-centered dentinal hypersensitivity treatment outcomes: results from the national dental PBRN. JDR Clin Trans Res 2018; 3 (01) 76-82
  • 24 Lamont T, Innes N. Study suggests dentine bonding agents provided better relief from dentine hypersensitivity than a desensitising toothpaste. Evid Based Dent 2013; 14 (04) 105-106
  • 25 Yilmaz HG, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E. Long-term effect of diode laser irradiation compared to sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in periodontal maintenance patients: a randomized controlled clinical study. Photomed Laser Surg 2011; 29 (11) 721-725
  • 26 Umberto R, Claudia R, Gaspare P, Gianluca T, Alessandro V. Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by diode laser: a clinical study. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: 858950
  • 27 Hashim NT, Gasmalla BG, Sabahelkheir AH, Awooda AM. Effect of the clinical application of the diode laser (810 nm) in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. BMC Res Notes 2014; 7: 31