The Use of Intraosseous Screw for Upper Molar Distalization: A Case Report

ABSTRACT

The use of implants has made a major change in orthodontic treatment mechanics. They have replaced conventional unaesthetic and compliance dependent extraoral appliances with well accepted intraoral mechanics. Implants can be used in molar and canine distalization, intrusion and in extraoral force applications. In the present case report, treatment of a case using an intermaxillary fixation screw (IMF) will be presented. The treatment results will be evaluated using pretreatment, post distalization and post treatment cephalometric radiographs and dental casts. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:115-121)

Key words:

Dental erosion - Citric acid - Non-carious cervical lesion

• REFERENCES

• 1 Meisen B, Verna C. A rational approach to orthodontic anchorage. Prog Orthod 1999; 1: 10-22
• 2 Higuchi KW, Slack JM. The use of titanium fixtures for intraoral anchorage to facilitate orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 338-344
• 3 Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 100-106
• 4 Gelgor IE, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI, Dolanmaz D, Kalayci A. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 838-850
• 5 Roberts WE, Smith RK, Silberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 95-111
• 6 Roberts WE, Marshall KJ, Mozsary P. Rigid endosseous implant utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close atrophic extraction site. Angle Orthod 1990; 60: 135-152
• 7 Diedrich PR, Fuhrmann RA, Wehrbein H, Erpenstein H. Distal movement of premolars to provide posterior abutments for missing molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 355-360
• 8 Roberts WE, Arbuckle GR, Analoui M. Rate of mesial translation of mandibular molars using implant-anchored mechanics. Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 331-338
• 9 Wehrbein H, Feifel H, Diedrich P. Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 678-686
• 10 Block MS, Hoffman DR. A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 251-258
• 11 Karaman AI, Basciftci FA, Polat O. Unilateral distal molar movement with an implant-supported distal jet appliance. Angle Orthod 2002; 72: 167-174
• 12 Ödman J, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Branemark PI, Thilander B. Osseointegrated titanium implants-a new approach in orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1988; 10: 98-105
• 13 Gedrange T, Kobel C, Harzer W. Hard palate deformation in an animal model following quasi-static loading to stimulate that of orthodontic anchorage implants. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 349-354
• 14 Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1983; 17: 266-269
• 15 Byloff FK, Kärcher H, Clar E, Stoff F. An implant to eliminate anchorage loss during molar distalization: a case report involving the Graz implant-supported pendulum. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 2000; 15: 129-137
• 16 Kircelli BH, Zafer OP, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchoraged pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod 2005; 76: 650-659
• 17 Escobar SA, Tellez PA, Moncada CA, Villegas CA, Latorre CM, Oberti G. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bonesupported pendulum: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007; 131: 545-549
• 18 Polat-Ozsoy O, Kircelli BH, Arman-Ôzçırpıcı A, Pektaṣ ZÖ, Uçkan S. Pendulum springs with different anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop (in press)