CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2009; 03(04): 314-317
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697450
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Effect of Storage Temperature on Bond Strength of a Self-Etch Adhesive System to Pulp Chamber Dentin

Nazmiye Donmez
a   Specialist in Oral Health Hospital, Konya, Turkey
,
Hale Ari
b   Department of Endodontics, Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Konya, Turkey
,
Sema Belli
b   Department of Endodontics, Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Konya, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 October 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of storage temperature on bond strength of a self etching primer system to pulp chamber dentin.

Methods: SE Bond (Kuraray, JAPAN) adhesive system and Clearfil Photo Posterior (Kuraray, JAPAN) composite resin were used. Eight extracted caries-free human molar teeth were used. Access cavities were prepared through the pulp chamber, randomly distributed into 4 groups and prepared as follows: Group 1 (Control): SE Primer and SE Bond (SEB) were applied to the pulp chamber dentin according to the manufacturer’s instructions, immediately after the delivery from the manufacturer and then the pulp chamber was restored with a resin restorative material. The primer agent of the following groups was stored in a refrigerator and kept at 4�C. Group 2: restored with SEB, kept at 4°C refrigerator for 1 year, Group 3: restored with SEB kept at 23°C room temperature for 1 year and Group 4: restored with SEB kept at 40°C incubator for 1 year. After 24 hrs the teeth were trimmed for microtensile bond testing and loaded to failure at 1mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test (P<.05).

Results: The results indicated that Group 4 showed lowest bond strength when compared to the others (P<.05). No statistically significant difference was found among the other groups (P>.05).

Conclusions: As a result of this study, it was concluded that increasing storing temperature or storing period decreases microtensile bond strength of a SEB system to pulp chamber dentin. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:314-317)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
  • 2 Nystrom GP, Holtan JR, Phelps RA, Becker WS, Anderson TB. Temperature and humidity effects on bond strength of a dentinal adhesive. Oper Dent 1998;23:138-143.
  • 3 Nakatsuka K. Modern Trends in Adhesive Dentistry Proceedings of the Adhesive Dentistry Forum “Characteristics of Clearfil Mega Bond(Clearfil SE Bond)” 1st ed. Yokohama (Japan): Kuraray publishers; 2000.
  • 4 Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992;8:125.
  • 5 Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999;78:699-705.
  • 6 Burrow MF, Taniguchi Y, Nikaido T, Satoh M, Inai N, Tagami J et al. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on early bond strengths to dentine. J Dent 1995;23:41-45.
  • 7 Spohr AM, Sobrinho LC, Consani S, Sinhoreti MAC, Borges GA. Effect of refrigeration on tensile bond strength of three adhesive systems. Braz Dent J 2001;12:75-79.
  • 8 Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Broome JC, Fox MJ. Effect of refrigeration on shear bond strength of three dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1999;12:131-133.
  • 9 Ogata M. Clinical factors influencing dentin bonding. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Tokyo, Japan. 2003.