A Survey of Common Payment Methods and Their Determinants in Dental Clinics, in Tehran, 2018

Abstract

Objective It is believed that the payment method to dentists may affect their treatment decisions. Although payment systems may enhance job satisfaction, reduce the costs, and make better treatment decisions, there is little information about how to achieve these objectives. The aim of the present study was to survey the payment methods and the related factors in dental clinics of Tehran.

Materials and Methods Using the latest list published by the Iranian Ministry of Health, we visited all dental clinics located in Tehran, and used a checklist to collect the data of the type of management, geographical location of the clinic in Tehran, payment method and its amount, history of payment method changes in the last decade, relationship between the amount of payment and the position of technical supervisor dentist, any difference in the amount of payment to male and female dentists and to young and experienced dentists. Then, the relationship between the amount of payment and the above-mentioned variables was investigated.

Results The governmental sector tends to use fixed salary methods and the private sector usually uses the fee-for-service (FFS) method. Geographical location, type of management, date of establishment, and having the position of technical supervisor dentist had a significant relationship with the amount of payment. The dentist’s gender and years of experience did not have any relationship with the amount of payment.

Conclusion According to the results of the present study, the method and amount of payment to dentists were related to the date of clinic establishment, having the position of technical supervisor dentist, and geographical location of the clinic. These factors could be considered as the main elements in balancing costs in clinics and improving job satisfaction among dentists.

Keywords

fixed salary - fee-for-service - payment method - dentistry

• References

• 1 Donaldson C, Gerard K, Jan S. et al. Economics of Health Care Financing: The Visible Hand. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1993
• 2 Grytten J, Holst D, Skau I. Incentives and remuneration systems in dental services. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2009; 9 (03) 259-278
• 3 Grytten J. Payment systems and incentives in dentistry. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2017; 45 (01) 1-11
• 4 Grignon M, Paris V, Polton D, Couffinhal A, Pierrard B. Influence of physician payment methods on the efficiency of the health care system. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada Ottawa 2002; 00
• 5 Ratcliffe J, Laver K, Couzner L, Crotty M. Health economics and geriatrics: challenges and opportunities. In: Atwood CS. ed. Geriatrics. Rijeka, Croatia : InTech; 2012
• 6 Malone A, Conway DI. Payment methods may influence behaviour of primary care dentists. Evid Based Dent 2015; 16 (01) 4-5
• 7 Chawla M, Windak A, Berman P, Kulis M. Paying the Physician: Review of different methods. Department of Population and International Health, Harvard School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts 1997
• 8 Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS. et al. Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 3 (03) CD002215
• 9 Shen J, Andersen R, Brook R, Kominski G, Albert PS, Wenger N. The effects of payment method on clinical decision-making: physician responses to clinical scenarios. Med Care 2004; 42 (03) 297-302
• 10 Carrin G, Hanvoravongchai P. Provider payments and patient charges as policy tools for cost-containment: how successful are they in high-income countries?. Hum Resour Health 2003; 1 (01) 6
• 11 Mirabedini SA, Fazl Hashemi SME, Sarabi Asiabar A, Rezapour A, Azami-Aghdash S, Hosseini Amnab H. Out-of-pocket and informal payments in Iran’s health care system: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2017; 31: 70
• 12 Javani A, Abolhallaje M, Raadabadi M. et al. Analysis of development levels in the cities of Tehran province regarding health infrastructural index: the strategy of standardized score and Morris’ inequality index. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2015; 29: 304
• 13 Kolasa K, Kowalczyk M. Does cost sharing do more harm or more good? - a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health 2016; 16 (01) 992
• 14 Grytten J, Holst D, Laake P. Supplier inducement. Its effect on dental services in Norway. J Health Econ 1990; 9 (04) 483-491
• 15 Birch S. The identification of supplier-inducement in a fixed price system of health care provision. The case of dentistry in the United Kingdom. J Health Econ 1988; 7 (02) 129-150
• 16 Greenacre L, Akbar S. The impact of payment method on shopping behaviour among low income consumers. J Retailing Consum Serv 2019; 47: 87-93
• 17 Newton JT, Thorogood N, Gibbons DE. A study of the career development of male and female dental practitioners. Br Dent J 2000; 188 (02) 90-94
• 18 Collins JM, Cunningham SJ, Moles DR, Galloway J, Hunt NP. Factors which influence working patterns of orthodontists in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J 2009; 207 (01) E1 discussion 30–31
• 19 Beazoglou TJ, Bailit HL, DeVitto J, McGowan T, Myne-Joslin V. Impact of dental therapists on productivity and finances: II. Federally Qualified Health Centers J Dent Educ 2012; 76 (08) 1068-1076
• 20 Grytten J. Models for financing dental services. A review. Community Dent Health 2005; 22 (02) 75-85
• 21 Brocklehurst P. Price J Glenny AM, Tickle M, Birch S, Mertz E, Grytten J. The effect of different methods of remuneration on the behaviour of primary care dentists. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (11) CD009853